在接受抗逆转录病毒疗法的 HIV-1 感染者中使用两种治疗性镶嵌 HIV-1 疫苗策略的免疫原性。

IF 6.9 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Boris Julg, Kathryn E Stephenson, Frank Tomaka, Stephen R Walsh, C Sabrina Tan, Ludo Lavreys, Michal Sarnecki, Jessica L Ansel, Diane G Kanjilal, Kate Jaegle, Tessa Speidel, Joseph P Nkolola, Erica N Borducchi, Esmee Braams, Laura Pattacini, Eleanor Burgess, Shlomi Ilan, Yannic Bartsch, Katherine E Yanosick, Michael S Seaman, Daniel J Stieh, Janine van Duijn, Wouter Willems, Merlin L Robb, Nelson L Michael, Bruce D Walker, Maria Grazia Pau, Hanneke Schuitemaker, Dan H Barouch
{"title":"在接受抗逆转录病毒疗法的 HIV-1 感染者中使用两种治疗性镶嵌 HIV-1 疫苗策略的免疫原性。","authors":"Boris Julg, Kathryn E Stephenson, Frank Tomaka, Stephen R Walsh, C Sabrina Tan, Ludo Lavreys, Michal Sarnecki, Jessica L Ansel, Diane G Kanjilal, Kate Jaegle, Tessa Speidel, Joseph P Nkolola, Erica N Borducchi, Esmee Braams, Laura Pattacini, Eleanor Burgess, Shlomi Ilan, Yannic Bartsch, Katherine E Yanosick, Michael S Seaman, Daniel J Stieh, Janine van Duijn, Wouter Willems, Merlin L Robb, Nelson L Michael, Bruce D Walker, Maria Grazia Pau, Hanneke Schuitemaker, Dan H Barouch","doi":"10.1038/s41541-024-00876-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mosaic HIV-1 vaccines have been shown to elicit robust humoral and cellular immune responses in people living with HIV-1 (PLWH), that had started antiretroviral therapy (ART) during acute infection. We evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of 2 mosaic vaccine regimens in virologically suppressed individuals that had initiated ART during the chronic phase of infection, exemplifying the majority of PLWH. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 trial (IPCAVD013/HTX1002) 25 ART-suppressed PLWH were randomized to receive Ad26.Mos4.HIV/MVA-Mosaic (Ad26/MVA) (n = 10) or Ad26.Mos4.HIV/Ad26.Mos4.HIV plus adjuvanted gp140 protein (Ad26/Ad26+gp140) (n = 9) or placebo (n = 6). Primary endpoints included safety and tolerability and secondary endpoints included HIV-specific binding and neutralizing antibody titers and HIV-specific T cell responses. Both vaccine regimens were well tolerated with pain/tenderness at the injection site and fatigue, myalgia/chills and headache as the most commonly reported solicited local and grade 3 systemic adverse events, respectively. In the Ad26/Ad26+gp140 group, Env-specific IFN-γ T cell responses showed a median 12-fold increase while responses to Gag and Pol increased 1.8 and 2.4-fold, respectively. The breadth of T cell responses to individual peptide subpools increased from 11.0 pre-vaccination to 26.0 in the Ad26/Ad26+gp140 group and from 10.0 to 14.5 in the Ad26/MVA group. Ad26/Ad26+gp140 vaccination increased binding antibody titers against vaccine-matched clade C Env 5.5-fold as well as augmented neutralizing antibody titers against Clade C pseudovirus by 7.2-fold. Both vaccine regimens were immunogenic, while the addition of the protein boost resulted in additional T cell and augmented binding and neutralizing antibody titers. These data suggest that the Ad26/Ad26+gp140 regimen should be tested further.</p>","PeriodicalId":19335,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Vaccines","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11116546/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immunogenicity of 2 therapeutic mosaic HIV-1 vaccine strategies in individuals with HIV-1 on antiretroviral therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Boris Julg, Kathryn E Stephenson, Frank Tomaka, Stephen R Walsh, C Sabrina Tan, Ludo Lavreys, Michal Sarnecki, Jessica L Ansel, Diane G Kanjilal, Kate Jaegle, Tessa Speidel, Joseph P Nkolola, Erica N Borducchi, Esmee Braams, Laura Pattacini, Eleanor Burgess, Shlomi Ilan, Yannic Bartsch, Katherine E Yanosick, Michael S Seaman, Daniel J Stieh, Janine van Duijn, Wouter Willems, Merlin L Robb, Nelson L Michael, Bruce D Walker, Maria Grazia Pau, Hanneke Schuitemaker, Dan H Barouch\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41541-024-00876-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mosaic HIV-1 vaccines have been shown to elicit robust humoral and cellular immune responses in people living with HIV-1 (PLWH), that had started antiretroviral therapy (ART) during acute infection. We evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of 2 mosaic vaccine regimens in virologically suppressed individuals that had initiated ART during the chronic phase of infection, exemplifying the majority of PLWH. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 trial (IPCAVD013/HTX1002) 25 ART-suppressed PLWH were randomized to receive Ad26.Mos4.HIV/MVA-Mosaic (Ad26/MVA) (n = 10) or Ad26.Mos4.HIV/Ad26.Mos4.HIV plus adjuvanted gp140 protein (Ad26/Ad26+gp140) (n = 9) or placebo (n = 6). Primary endpoints included safety and tolerability and secondary endpoints included HIV-specific binding and neutralizing antibody titers and HIV-specific T cell responses. Both vaccine regimens were well tolerated with pain/tenderness at the injection site and fatigue, myalgia/chills and headache as the most commonly reported solicited local and grade 3 systemic adverse events, respectively. In the Ad26/Ad26+gp140 group, Env-specific IFN-γ T cell responses showed a median 12-fold increase while responses to Gag and Pol increased 1.8 and 2.4-fold, respectively. The breadth of T cell responses to individual peptide subpools increased from 11.0 pre-vaccination to 26.0 in the Ad26/Ad26+gp140 group and from 10.0 to 14.5 in the Ad26/MVA group. Ad26/Ad26+gp140 vaccination increased binding antibody titers against vaccine-matched clade C Env 5.5-fold as well as augmented neutralizing antibody titers against Clade C pseudovirus by 7.2-fold. Both vaccine regimens were immunogenic, while the addition of the protein boost resulted in additional T cell and augmented binding and neutralizing antibody titers. These data suggest that the Ad26/Ad26+gp140 regimen should be tested further.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Vaccines\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11116546/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Vaccines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-024-00876-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-024-00876-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在急性感染期间开始接受抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)的 HIV-1 感染者(PLWH)中,马赛克 HIV-1 疫苗已被证明能引起强有力的体液和细胞免疫反应。我们评估了在慢性感染阶段开始接受抗逆转录病毒疗法的病毒学抑制个体(即大多数 PLWH)中使用两种镶嵌疫苗方案的安全性和免疫原性。在这项双盲、安慰剂对照的 1 期试验(IPCAVD013/HTX1002)中,25 名抗逆转录病毒疗法抑制的 PLWH 被随机分配接受 Ad26.Mos4.HIV/MVA-Mosaic(Ad26/MVA)(n = 10)或 Ad26.Mos4.HIV/Ad26.Mos4.HIV+佐剂 gp140 蛋白(Ad26/Ad26+gp140)(n = 9)或安慰剂(n = 6)。主要终点包括安全性和耐受性,次要终点包括HIV特异性结合抗体和中和抗体滴度以及HIV特异性T细胞反应。两种疫苗方案的耐受性都很好,注射部位疼痛/触痛、疲劳、肌痛/发冷和头痛分别是最常报告的局部和3级全身不良反应。在Ad26/Ad26+gp140组,Env特异性IFN-γ T细胞应答中位数增加了12倍,而对Gag和Pol的应答分别增加了1.8倍和2.4倍。在 Ad26/Ad26+gp140 组中,T 细胞对单个肽亚群的应答广度从接种前的 11.0 增加到 26.0,在 Ad26/MVA 组中从 10.0 增加到 14.5。Ad26/Ad26+gp140 疫苗接种后,针对与疫苗匹配的 C 群 Env 的结合抗体滴度提高了 5.5 倍,针对 C 群假病毒的中和抗体滴度提高了 7.2 倍。两种疫苗方案都具有免疫原性,而添加蛋白增强剂可增加T细胞,提高结合抗体和中和抗体滴度。这些数据表明,应进一步测试 Ad26/Ad26+gp140 方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Immunogenicity of 2 therapeutic mosaic HIV-1 vaccine strategies in individuals with HIV-1 on antiretroviral therapy.

Immunogenicity of 2 therapeutic mosaic HIV-1 vaccine strategies in individuals with HIV-1 on antiretroviral therapy.

Mosaic HIV-1 vaccines have been shown to elicit robust humoral and cellular immune responses in people living with HIV-1 (PLWH), that had started antiretroviral therapy (ART) during acute infection. We evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of 2 mosaic vaccine regimens in virologically suppressed individuals that had initiated ART during the chronic phase of infection, exemplifying the majority of PLWH. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 trial (IPCAVD013/HTX1002) 25 ART-suppressed PLWH were randomized to receive Ad26.Mos4.HIV/MVA-Mosaic (Ad26/MVA) (n = 10) or Ad26.Mos4.HIV/Ad26.Mos4.HIV plus adjuvanted gp140 protein (Ad26/Ad26+gp140) (n = 9) or placebo (n = 6). Primary endpoints included safety and tolerability and secondary endpoints included HIV-specific binding and neutralizing antibody titers and HIV-specific T cell responses. Both vaccine regimens were well tolerated with pain/tenderness at the injection site and fatigue, myalgia/chills and headache as the most commonly reported solicited local and grade 3 systemic adverse events, respectively. In the Ad26/Ad26+gp140 group, Env-specific IFN-γ T cell responses showed a median 12-fold increase while responses to Gag and Pol increased 1.8 and 2.4-fold, respectively. The breadth of T cell responses to individual peptide subpools increased from 11.0 pre-vaccination to 26.0 in the Ad26/Ad26+gp140 group and from 10.0 to 14.5 in the Ad26/MVA group. Ad26/Ad26+gp140 vaccination increased binding antibody titers against vaccine-matched clade C Env 5.5-fold as well as augmented neutralizing antibody titers against Clade C pseudovirus by 7.2-fold. Both vaccine regimens were immunogenic, while the addition of the protein boost resulted in additional T cell and augmented binding and neutralizing antibody titers. These data suggest that the Ad26/Ad26+gp140 regimen should be tested further.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NPJ Vaccines
NPJ Vaccines Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
146
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Online-only and open access, npj Vaccines is dedicated to highlighting the most important scientific advances in vaccine research and development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信