乳房再造患者和医护人员对手术引流管的看法:定性调查研究。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
William M Tian, Jess D Rames, Brooke E Schroeder, Kristina Dunworth, Victoria N Yi, Melissa Tran, Jennifer Gallagher, Robin Bachelder, Scott T Hollenbeck
{"title":"乳房再造患者和医护人员对手术引流管的看法:定性调查研究。","authors":"William M Tian, Jess D Rames, Brooke E Schroeder, Kristina Dunworth, Victoria N Yi, Melissa Tran, Jennifer Gallagher, Robin Bachelder, Scott T Hollenbeck","doi":"10.1055/a-2332-0444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Surgical drains are a key component for recovery in breast reconstruction procedures. However, they are often cumbersome and carry a risk of infection with prolonged use. We aimed to develop a more thorough understanding of patient and health care provider perspectives on surgical drains, to inform future efforts in improving the breast reconstruction patient experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Twenty-nine breast reconstruction patients and eight plastic surgery providers were recruited to complete surveys focused on surgical drains. Likert scales ranging from 1 to 5 were developed to gauge how bothersome drains felt, as well as concern for infection. Ordinal variable and categorical multiple-choice analyses were applied as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Fifteen (51.7%) patients underwent implant-based breast reconstruction, and 14 (48.3%) patients underwent autologous breast reconstruction. The most common duration of drain placement was 2 weeks (<i>N</i> = 13). The surgical site infection (SSI) rate requiring antibiotics was 28% (<i>N</i> = 8). On a scale of 1 to 5, both patients (median = 3) and providers (median = 2.5) viewed drains as bothersome. Patients were \"frequently\" concerned about infection risk (median = 3). Other high-frequency patient concerns included general pain and discomfort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Surgical drains are a common component of breast reconstruction procedures and are viewed as cumbersome by both patients and providers. Patients expressed concerns about drain site pain, discomfort, and tugging on clothing. Patients and providers both believed that drains could contribute to SSI. Overall, these data provide insight to drive future improvements in the patient drain experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of Surgical Drains among Breast Reconstruction Patients and Health Care Staff: A Qualitative Survey Study.\",\"authors\":\"William M Tian, Jess D Rames, Brooke E Schroeder, Kristina Dunworth, Victoria N Yi, Melissa Tran, Jennifer Gallagher, Robin Bachelder, Scott T Hollenbeck\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2332-0444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Surgical drains are a key component for recovery in breast reconstruction procedures. However, they are often cumbersome and carry a risk of infection with prolonged use. We aimed to develop a more thorough understanding of patient and health care provider perspectives on surgical drains, to inform future efforts in improving the breast reconstruction patient experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Twenty-nine breast reconstruction patients and eight plastic surgery providers were recruited to complete surveys focused on surgical drains. Likert scales ranging from 1 to 5 were developed to gauge how bothersome drains felt, as well as concern for infection. Ordinal variable and categorical multiple-choice analyses were applied as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Fifteen (51.7%) patients underwent implant-based breast reconstruction, and 14 (48.3%) patients underwent autologous breast reconstruction. The most common duration of drain placement was 2 weeks (<i>N</i> = 13). The surgical site infection (SSI) rate requiring antibiotics was 28% (<i>N</i> = 8). On a scale of 1 to 5, both patients (median = 3) and providers (median = 2.5) viewed drains as bothersome. Patients were \\\"frequently\\\" concerned about infection risk (median = 3). Other high-frequency patient concerns included general pain and discomfort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Surgical drains are a common component of breast reconstruction procedures and are viewed as cumbersome by both patients and providers. Patients expressed concerns about drain site pain, discomfort, and tugging on clothing. Patients and providers both believed that drains could contribute to SSI. Overall, these data provide insight to drive future improvements in the patient drain experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2332-0444\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2332-0444","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:手术引流管是乳房再造手术恢复的关键部件。然而,手术引流管通常比较麻烦,而且长期使用有感染的风险。我们的目的是更透彻地了解患者和医护人员对手术引流管的看法,为今后改善乳房再造患者的体验提供参考:方法:我们招募了 29 名乳房再造患者和 8 名整形外科医护人员来完成关于手术引流管的调查。调查采用 1-5 分的李克特量表来衡量引流管的困扰程度以及对感染的担忧。根据情况进行了顺序变量和分类多选分析:15名患者(51.7%)接受了假体乳房重建,14名患者(48.3%)接受了自体乳房重建。最常见的引流管放置时间为两周(13人)。需要使用抗生素的手术部位感染率为28%(8例)。在1-5分的评分中,患者(中位数=3)和医疗服务提供者(中位数=2.5)都认为引流管令人烦恼。患者 "经常 "担心感染风险(中位数 = 3)。患者经常关注的其他问题包括一般疼痛和不适:结论:手术引流管是乳房重建手术的常见组成部分,患者和医护人员都认为引流管很麻烦。患者对引流管部位的疼痛、不适和拉扯衣物表示担忧。患者和医护人员都认为引流管可能会导致手术部位感染。总体而言,这些数据为今后改善患者引流管使用体验提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceptions of Surgical Drains among Breast Reconstruction Patients and Health Care Staff: A Qualitative Survey Study.

Background:  Surgical drains are a key component for recovery in breast reconstruction procedures. However, they are often cumbersome and carry a risk of infection with prolonged use. We aimed to develop a more thorough understanding of patient and health care provider perspectives on surgical drains, to inform future efforts in improving the breast reconstruction patient experience.

Methods:  Twenty-nine breast reconstruction patients and eight plastic surgery providers were recruited to complete surveys focused on surgical drains. Likert scales ranging from 1 to 5 were developed to gauge how bothersome drains felt, as well as concern for infection. Ordinal variable and categorical multiple-choice analyses were applied as appropriate.

Results:  Fifteen (51.7%) patients underwent implant-based breast reconstruction, and 14 (48.3%) patients underwent autologous breast reconstruction. The most common duration of drain placement was 2 weeks (N = 13). The surgical site infection (SSI) rate requiring antibiotics was 28% (N = 8). On a scale of 1 to 5, both patients (median = 3) and providers (median = 2.5) viewed drains as bothersome. Patients were "frequently" concerned about infection risk (median = 3). Other high-frequency patient concerns included general pain and discomfort.

Conclusion:  Surgical drains are a common component of breast reconstruction procedures and are viewed as cumbersome by both patients and providers. Patients expressed concerns about drain site pain, discomfort, and tugging on clothing. Patients and providers both believed that drains could contribute to SSI. Overall, these data provide insight to drive future improvements in the patient drain experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信