Ryan P Cauley, Benjamin Rahmani, Oluwaseun D Adebagbo, John Park, Shannon R Garvey, Amy Chen, Sasha Nickman, Micaela Tobin, Lauren Valentine, Allan A Weidman, Dhruv Singhal, Arriyan Dowlatshahi, Samuel J Lin, Bernard T Lee
{"title":"优化手术效果和预防性手术的作用:范围界定综述。","authors":"Ryan P Cauley, Benjamin Rahmani, Oluwaseun D Adebagbo, John Park, Shannon R Garvey, Amy Chen, Sasha Nickman, Micaela Tobin, Lauren Valentine, Allan A Weidman, Dhruv Singhal, Arriyan Dowlatshahi, Samuel J Lin, Bernard T Lee","doi":"10.1055/a-2331-7885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Plastic and reconstructive surgeons are often presented with reconstructive challenges as a sequela of complications in high-risk surgical patients, ranging from exposure of hardware, lymphedema, and chronic pain after amputation. These complications can result in significant morbidity, recovery time, resource utilization, and cost. Given the prevalence of surgical complications managed by plastic and reconstructive surgeons, developing novel preventative techniques to mitigate surgical risk is paramount.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Herein we aim to understand efforts supporting the nascent field of preventive surgery, including (1) enhanced risk stratification, (2) medical optimization and prehabilitation, (3) surgical mitigation techniques, and (4) advancements in postoperative care. Through an emphasis on four surgical cohorts who may benefit from preventive surgery, two of which are at high risk of morbidity from wound-related complications (patients undergoing sternotomy and spine procedures) and two at high risk of other morbidities, including lymphedema and neuropathic pain, we aim to provide a comprehensive and improved understanding of preventive surgery. Additionally, the role of risk analysis for these procedures and the relationship between microsurgery and prophylaxis is emphasized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Although multiple risk mitigation methods have demonstrated clear benefits, including prophylactic surgical procedures and earlier involvement of plastic surgery, their use is widely variable across institutions. Many current risk assessment tools are suboptimal for supporting more algorithmic approaches to reduce surgical risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Reconstructive surgeons are ideally placed to lead efforts in the creation and validation of accurate risk assessment tools and to support algorithmic approaches to surgical risk mitigation. Through a paradigm shift, including universal promotion of the concept of \"Preventive Surgery,\" major improvements in surgical outcomes may be achieved.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":"248-260"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Surgical Outcomes and the Role of Preventive Surgery: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Ryan P Cauley, Benjamin Rahmani, Oluwaseun D Adebagbo, John Park, Shannon R Garvey, Amy Chen, Sasha Nickman, Micaela Tobin, Lauren Valentine, Allan A Weidman, Dhruv Singhal, Arriyan Dowlatshahi, Samuel J Lin, Bernard T Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2331-7885\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Plastic and reconstructive surgeons are often presented with reconstructive challenges as a sequela of complications in high-risk surgical patients, ranging from exposure of hardware, lymphedema, and chronic pain after amputation. These complications can result in significant morbidity, recovery time, resource utilization, and cost. Given the prevalence of surgical complications managed by plastic and reconstructive surgeons, developing novel preventative techniques to mitigate surgical risk is paramount.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Herein we aim to understand efforts supporting the nascent field of preventive surgery, including (1) enhanced risk stratification, (2) medical optimization and prehabilitation, (3) surgical mitigation techniques, and (4) advancements in postoperative care. Through an emphasis on four surgical cohorts who may benefit from preventive surgery, two of which are at high risk of morbidity from wound-related complications (patients undergoing sternotomy and spine procedures) and two at high risk of other morbidities, including lymphedema and neuropathic pain, we aim to provide a comprehensive and improved understanding of preventive surgery. Additionally, the role of risk analysis for these procedures and the relationship between microsurgery and prophylaxis is emphasized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Although multiple risk mitigation methods have demonstrated clear benefits, including prophylactic surgical procedures and earlier involvement of plastic surgery, their use is widely variable across institutions. Many current risk assessment tools are suboptimal for supporting more algorithmic approaches to reduce surgical risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Reconstructive surgeons are ideally placed to lead efforts in the creation and validation of accurate risk assessment tools and to support algorithmic approaches to surgical risk mitigation. Through a paradigm shift, including universal promotion of the concept of \\\"Preventive Surgery,\\\" major improvements in surgical outcomes may be achieved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"248-260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2331-7885\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2331-7885","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimizing Surgical Outcomes and the Role of Preventive Surgery: A Scoping Review.
Background: Plastic and reconstructive surgeons are often presented with reconstructive challenges as a sequela of complications in high-risk surgical patients, ranging from exposure of hardware, lymphedema, and chronic pain after amputation. These complications can result in significant morbidity, recovery time, resource utilization, and cost. Given the prevalence of surgical complications managed by plastic and reconstructive surgeons, developing novel preventative techniques to mitigate surgical risk is paramount.
Methods: Herein we aim to understand efforts supporting the nascent field of preventive surgery, including (1) enhanced risk stratification, (2) medical optimization and prehabilitation, (3) surgical mitigation techniques, and (4) advancements in postoperative care. Through an emphasis on four surgical cohorts who may benefit from preventive surgery, two of which are at high risk of morbidity from wound-related complications (patients undergoing sternotomy and spine procedures) and two at high risk of other morbidities, including lymphedema and neuropathic pain, we aim to provide a comprehensive and improved understanding of preventive surgery. Additionally, the role of risk analysis for these procedures and the relationship between microsurgery and prophylaxis is emphasized.
Results: Although multiple risk mitigation methods have demonstrated clear benefits, including prophylactic surgical procedures and earlier involvement of plastic surgery, their use is widely variable across institutions. Many current risk assessment tools are suboptimal for supporting more algorithmic approaches to reduce surgical risk.
Conclusion: Reconstructive surgeons are ideally placed to lead efforts in the creation and validation of accurate risk assessment tools and to support algorithmic approaches to surgical risk mitigation. Through a paradigm shift, including universal promotion of the concept of "Preventive Surgery," major improvements in surgical outcomes may be achieved.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers.
The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases.
The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.