ECMO 氧合器中气体与血液比例过高的影响。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Perfusion-Uk Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1177/02676591241256089
Michael Shaw, Nigel Cross, Rebecca Richardson, Richard Crook, Timothy Thirulchelvam, Richard W Issitt
{"title":"ECMO 氧合器中气体与血液比例过高的影响。","authors":"Michael Shaw, Nigel Cross, Rebecca Richardson, Richard Crook, Timothy Thirulchelvam, Richard W Issitt","doi":"10.1177/02676591241256089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionOxygenators for paediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) are required to operate over a wide range of flow rates, in a patient group ranging from neonates through to fully grown adolescents. ECMO oxygenators typically have a manufacturer's stated maximum gas: blood flow rate (GBFR) ratio of 2:1, however, many patients require greater ratios than this for adequate CO<sub>2</sub> removal. Mismatches in GBFR in theory could result in high gas phase pressures. These increased pressures in theory could cause the formation of gross gaseous microemboli (GME) placing the child at higher risk of neurological injury.MethodsWe evaluated 6 paediatric and 6 adult A.L.ONE™ ECMO oxygenators and assessed their gas phase pressures and GME release, in an ex vivo setting, in GBFR ratios up to greater than 2, across a range of gas flow (1L - 10 L/min) rates with a fraction of inspired oxygen (F<sub>i</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) content of 50% and 100%.ResultsThere were no increases above 10 mmHg observed in gas phase pressures in GBFR >= 2:1 in either adult or paediatric oxygenators. Laboratory examination of GME activity demonstrated a small increase in post-membrane GME release over the study period. GME release was unaffected by F<sub>i</sub>O<sub>2</sub> setting or gas flow rate, with a maximum volume of < 6 µL in both paediatric and adult oxygenators.ConclusionsIn an ex vivo setting, increasing GBFR above 2:1 in a paediatric oxygenator, and to a GBFR of 2:1 in an adult oxygenator did not significantly increase gas phase pressures, and no oxygenator membrane rupture was observed. There were no associations between gas flow rates and GME production.</p>","PeriodicalId":49707,"journal":{"name":"Perfusion-Uk","volume":" ","pages":"678-685"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of excessive gas to blood ratios in an ECMO oxygenator.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Shaw, Nigel Cross, Rebecca Richardson, Richard Crook, Timothy Thirulchelvam, Richard W Issitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02676591241256089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>IntroductionOxygenators for paediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) are required to operate over a wide range of flow rates, in a patient group ranging from neonates through to fully grown adolescents. ECMO oxygenators typically have a manufacturer's stated maximum gas: blood flow rate (GBFR) ratio of 2:1, however, many patients require greater ratios than this for adequate CO<sub>2</sub> removal. Mismatches in GBFR in theory could result in high gas phase pressures. These increased pressures in theory could cause the formation of gross gaseous microemboli (GME) placing the child at higher risk of neurological injury.MethodsWe evaluated 6 paediatric and 6 adult A.L.ONE™ ECMO oxygenators and assessed their gas phase pressures and GME release, in an ex vivo setting, in GBFR ratios up to greater than 2, across a range of gas flow (1L - 10 L/min) rates with a fraction of inspired oxygen (F<sub>i</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) content of 50% and 100%.ResultsThere were no increases above 10 mmHg observed in gas phase pressures in GBFR >= 2:1 in either adult or paediatric oxygenators. Laboratory examination of GME activity demonstrated a small increase in post-membrane GME release over the study period. GME release was unaffected by F<sub>i</sub>O<sub>2</sub> setting or gas flow rate, with a maximum volume of < 6 µL in both paediatric and adult oxygenators.ConclusionsIn an ex vivo setting, increasing GBFR above 2:1 in a paediatric oxygenator, and to a GBFR of 2:1 in an adult oxygenator did not significantly increase gas phase pressures, and no oxygenator membrane rupture was observed. There were no associations between gas flow rates and GME production.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perfusion-Uk\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"678-685\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perfusion-Uk\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591241256089\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perfusion-Uk","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591241256089","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:用于儿科体外膜氧合(ECMO)的氧合机需要在很大的流速范围内运行,适用于从新生儿到完全成年的青少年患者。ECMO 氧合器制造商规定的最大气体:血液流速 (GBFR) 比率通常为 2:1,但许多患者需要比这更大的比率才能充分去除二氧化碳。理论上,GBFR 不匹配会导致气相压力过高。理论上,这些增大的压力可能会导致粗大气态微栓子(GME)的形成,使患儿面临更高的神经损伤风险:我们评估了 6 台儿科和 6 台成人 A.L.ONE™ ECMO 氧合器,并评估了它们的气相压力和 GME 释放情况,在体外环境下,在 GBFR 比率大于 2 的情况下,在气体流速(1 升 - 10 升/分钟)范围内,在吸入氧分数 (FiO2) 含量为 50% 和 100% 的情况下:结果:在 GBFR >= 2:1 的情况下,成人和儿童氧合器的气相压力均未超过 10 mmHg。对 GME 活性的实验室检查显示,在研究期间,膜后 GME 释放量略有增加。GME 释放不受 FiO2 设置或气体流速的影响,在儿科和成人氧合器中的最大释放量均小于 6 µL:在体外环境中,将儿童氧合器中的GBFR提高到2:1以上,以及将成人氧合器中的GBFR提高到2:1,都不会显著增加气相压力,也没有观察到氧合器膜破裂。气体流速与 GME 产量之间没有关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of excessive gas to blood ratios in an ECMO oxygenator.

IntroductionOxygenators for paediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) are required to operate over a wide range of flow rates, in a patient group ranging from neonates through to fully grown adolescents. ECMO oxygenators typically have a manufacturer's stated maximum gas: blood flow rate (GBFR) ratio of 2:1, however, many patients require greater ratios than this for adequate CO2 removal. Mismatches in GBFR in theory could result in high gas phase pressures. These increased pressures in theory could cause the formation of gross gaseous microemboli (GME) placing the child at higher risk of neurological injury.MethodsWe evaluated 6 paediatric and 6 adult A.L.ONE™ ECMO oxygenators and assessed their gas phase pressures and GME release, in an ex vivo setting, in GBFR ratios up to greater than 2, across a range of gas flow (1L - 10 L/min) rates with a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) content of 50% and 100%.ResultsThere were no increases above 10 mmHg observed in gas phase pressures in GBFR >= 2:1 in either adult or paediatric oxygenators. Laboratory examination of GME activity demonstrated a small increase in post-membrane GME release over the study period. GME release was unaffected by FiO2 setting or gas flow rate, with a maximum volume of < 6 µL in both paediatric and adult oxygenators.ConclusionsIn an ex vivo setting, increasing GBFR above 2:1 in a paediatric oxygenator, and to a GBFR of 2:1 in an adult oxygenator did not significantly increase gas phase pressures, and no oxygenator membrane rupture was observed. There were no associations between gas flow rates and GME production.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perfusion-Uk
Perfusion-Uk 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perfusion is an ISI-ranked, peer-reviewed scholarly journal, which provides current information on all aspects of perfusion, oxygenation and biocompatibility and their use in modern cardiac surgery. The journal is at the forefront of international research and development and presents an appropriately multidisciplinary approach to perfusion science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信