在儿科腹腔镜阑尾切除术中担任培训员。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
L Henderson, N Patwardhan, H Dagash
{"title":"在儿科腹腔镜阑尾切除术中担任培训员。","authors":"L Henderson, N Patwardhan, H Dagash","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intraoperative teaching is an essential surgical skill, but there is little literature regarding trainees acting as trainers; we characterised these cases in paediatric laparoscopic appendicectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective review of casenotes over two years (2015-2017) in a single tertiary paediatric surgical centre in the UK. Operating were: paediatric surgery Core Trainees (CT) (postgraduate year (PGY)3-4), Junior Registrars (JR) (PGY5-6) and Senior Registrars (SR) (PGY7+); collectively described as trainees.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 53 (20.7%) of 256 appendicectomies were trainee as trainer (TT) cases; 22 cases (41.5%) were performed by a CT supervised by a Registrar, and 31 (58.4%) by a JR supervised by a SR. Among the cases, 17 (32.1%) were complex, 47 (88.7%) were in working hours (8am-5pm), and 50 (94.3%) took place Monday to Friday. Median (interquartile range) duration of surgery was 65 (52-77) minutes. In the first year, 60 (47%) appendicectomies were performed by JRs. JR 1 was TT in three cases (8.8%) and JR 2 in five cases (19.2%); in all cases, the learner was a CT. Overall, there were 26 (10.6%) negative appendicectomies, 8 (3%) conversions, 19 (7%) readmissions within 30 days of discharge and 3 (1.1%) required reoperation; there was no statistically significant difference in complications between TT and non-TT cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopic appendicectomy is an excellent model for trainees to act as trainer; case selection included simple cases during daylight hours. Our outcomes are comparable with published literature, suggesting that this teaching method is safe for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trainee as trainer in paediatric laparoscopic appendicectomy<sup />.\",\"authors\":\"L Henderson, N Patwardhan, H Dagash\",\"doi\":\"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intraoperative teaching is an essential surgical skill, but there is little literature regarding trainees acting as trainers; we characterised these cases in paediatric laparoscopic appendicectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective review of casenotes over two years (2015-2017) in a single tertiary paediatric surgical centre in the UK. Operating were: paediatric surgery Core Trainees (CT) (postgraduate year (PGY)3-4), Junior Registrars (JR) (PGY5-6) and Senior Registrars (SR) (PGY7+); collectively described as trainees.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 53 (20.7%) of 256 appendicectomies were trainee as trainer (TT) cases; 22 cases (41.5%) were performed by a CT supervised by a Registrar, and 31 (58.4%) by a JR supervised by a SR. Among the cases, 17 (32.1%) were complex, 47 (88.7%) were in working hours (8am-5pm), and 50 (94.3%) took place Monday to Friday. Median (interquartile range) duration of surgery was 65 (52-77) minutes. In the first year, 60 (47%) appendicectomies were performed by JRs. JR 1 was TT in three cases (8.8%) and JR 2 in five cases (19.2%); in all cases, the learner was a CT. Overall, there were 26 (10.6%) negative appendicectomies, 8 (3%) conversions, 19 (7%) readmissions within 30 days of discharge and 3 (1.1%) required reoperation; there was no statistically significant difference in complications between TT and non-TT cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopic appendicectomy is an excellent model for trainees to act as trainer; case selection included simple cases during daylight hours. Our outcomes are comparable with published literature, suggesting that this teaching method is safe for patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0032\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:术中教学是一项基本的外科技能,但有关受训者担任培训者的文献很少:术中教学是一项基本的外科技能,但有关受训者担任培训师的文献却很少;我们对小儿腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的这些病例进行了分析:这是一项对英国一家三级儿科外科中心两年来(2015-2017年)病例记录的回顾性研究。操作人员包括:儿外科核心受训人员(CT)(研究生年级(PGY)3-4)、初级注册医师(JR)(PGY5-6)和高级注册医师(SR)(PGY7+);统称为受训人员:在256例阑尾切除术中,共有53例(20.7%)是由受训者担任培训师(TT)的病例;22例(41.5%)由注册医师指导的CT实施,31例(58.4%)由注册医师指导的JR实施。在这些病例中,17 例(32.1%)为复杂病例,47 例(88.7%)在工作时间(上午 8 时至下午 5 时)内进行,50 例(94.3%)在周一至周五进行。手术时间中位数(四分位数间距)为 65(52-77)分钟。第一年中,有 60 例(47%)阑尾切除手术由联合医务人员完成。JR 1 是 TT 的有 3 例(8.8%),JR 2 是 TT 的有 5 例(19.2%);在所有病例中,学习者都是 CT。总体而言,有26例(10.6%)阑尾切除术结果为阴性,8例(3%)转为阳性,19例(7%)在出院后30天内再次入院,3例(1.1%)需要再次手术;TT和非TT病例的并发症差异无统计学意义:结论:腹腔镜阑尾切除术是一种很好的培训模式,可作为受训者的培训教材;病例选择包括白天的简单病例。我们的结果与已发表的文献相当,表明这种教学方法对患者是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trainee as trainer in paediatric laparoscopic appendicectomy.

Background: Intraoperative teaching is an essential surgical skill, but there is little literature regarding trainees acting as trainers; we characterised these cases in paediatric laparoscopic appendicectomy.

Methods: This is a retrospective review of casenotes over two years (2015-2017) in a single tertiary paediatric surgical centre in the UK. Operating were: paediatric surgery Core Trainees (CT) (postgraduate year (PGY)3-4), Junior Registrars (JR) (PGY5-6) and Senior Registrars (SR) (PGY7+); collectively described as trainees.

Results: A total of 53 (20.7%) of 256 appendicectomies were trainee as trainer (TT) cases; 22 cases (41.5%) were performed by a CT supervised by a Registrar, and 31 (58.4%) by a JR supervised by a SR. Among the cases, 17 (32.1%) were complex, 47 (88.7%) were in working hours (8am-5pm), and 50 (94.3%) took place Monday to Friday. Median (interquartile range) duration of surgery was 65 (52-77) minutes. In the first year, 60 (47%) appendicectomies were performed by JRs. JR 1 was TT in three cases (8.8%) and JR 2 in five cases (19.2%); in all cases, the learner was a CT. Overall, there were 26 (10.6%) negative appendicectomies, 8 (3%) conversions, 19 (7%) readmissions within 30 days of discharge and 3 (1.1%) required reoperation; there was no statistically significant difference in complications between TT and non-TT cases.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendicectomy is an excellent model for trainees to act as trainer; case selection included simple cases during daylight hours. Our outcomes are comparable with published literature, suggesting that this teaching method is safe for patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
316
期刊介绍: The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England is the official scholarly research journal of the Royal College of Surgeons and is published eight times a year in January, February, March, April, May, July, September and November. The main aim of the journal is to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed papers that relate to all branches of surgery. The Annals also includes letters and comments, a regular technical section, controversial topics, CORESS feedback and book reviews. The editorial board is composed of experts from all the surgical specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信