欧洲不同农场和景观尺度的农业发展路径:对可持续性和农民满意度的影响

IF 8.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Julian Helfenstein , Samuel Hepner , Amelie Kreuzer , Gregor Achermann , Tim Williams , Matthias Bürgi , Niels Debonne , Thymios Dimopoulos , Vasco Diogo , Wendy Fjellstad , Maria Garcia-Martin , Józef Hernik , Thanasis Kizos , Angela Lausch , Christian Levers , Jaan Liira , Franziska Mohr , Gerardo Moreno , Robert Pazur , Tomasz Salata , Felix Herzog
{"title":"欧洲不同农场和景观尺度的农业发展路径:对可持续性和农民满意度的影响","authors":"Julian Helfenstein ,&nbsp;Samuel Hepner ,&nbsp;Amelie Kreuzer ,&nbsp;Gregor Achermann ,&nbsp;Tim Williams ,&nbsp;Matthias Bürgi ,&nbsp;Niels Debonne ,&nbsp;Thymios Dimopoulos ,&nbsp;Vasco Diogo ,&nbsp;Wendy Fjellstad ,&nbsp;Maria Garcia-Martin ,&nbsp;Józef Hernik ,&nbsp;Thanasis Kizos ,&nbsp;Angela Lausch ,&nbsp;Christian Levers ,&nbsp;Jaan Liira ,&nbsp;Franziska Mohr ,&nbsp;Gerardo Moreno ,&nbsp;Robert Pazur ,&nbsp;Tomasz Salata ,&nbsp;Felix Herzog","doi":"10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Current agricultural practices in Europe are increasingly aggravating societal and environmental safety concerns. This creates social and regulatory pressures on farmers, which can lead to declining material and social status of farmers, farmer discontent, and anti-regulation protests. These tensions are rooted in conflicting value systems for agricultural development, which can range from productivist pathways (i.e. valuing production above all else) to increasing multifunctionality pathways (i.e. valuing agriculture for its contribution to multiple economic, environmental and societal needs). It is largely unknown to what degree individual farms and agricultural landscapes are transitioning towards increasing productivism or multifunctionality in practice. Here, we mapped landscape changes and interviewed farmers (n = 274) to examine the diversity of agricultural development pathways in 17 study sites across Europe over the last 20 years (2000–2020). We also assessed the associations between the development pathways and farmers’ perceptions of socio-economic outcomes, namely job satisfaction, societal valuation, and economic performance. Farm-level development was largely aligned with productivist pathways, while landscape-level changes aligned more closely with an increasing multifunctionality pathway. Farmers on pathways of increasing multifunctionality did not perceive improved outcomes on livelihood indicators as compared to productivist farmers. Furthermore, farms on increasing multifunctionality pathways were concentrated in sites with very high management intensities that face strong pressure from environmental regulations, as well as low-intensity, mountainous sites, where opportunities for intensification are limited. These results suggest that current pathways that increase multifunctionality arise mostly by necessity. Successful agricultural transformation will therefore require policy to create enabling environments that provide socioeconomic benefits for farmers to increase multifunctionality, and a civil society and market conditions that value sustainable agriculture.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":328,"journal":{"name":"Global Environmental Change","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 102855"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378024000591/pdfft?md5=bf87064751fc94665ae8b9d5c78a23e6&pid=1-s2.0-S0959378024000591-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Divergent agricultural development pathways across farm and landscape scales in Europe: Implications for sustainability and farmer satisfaction\",\"authors\":\"Julian Helfenstein ,&nbsp;Samuel Hepner ,&nbsp;Amelie Kreuzer ,&nbsp;Gregor Achermann ,&nbsp;Tim Williams ,&nbsp;Matthias Bürgi ,&nbsp;Niels Debonne ,&nbsp;Thymios Dimopoulos ,&nbsp;Vasco Diogo ,&nbsp;Wendy Fjellstad ,&nbsp;Maria Garcia-Martin ,&nbsp;Józef Hernik ,&nbsp;Thanasis Kizos ,&nbsp;Angela Lausch ,&nbsp;Christian Levers ,&nbsp;Jaan Liira ,&nbsp;Franziska Mohr ,&nbsp;Gerardo Moreno ,&nbsp;Robert Pazur ,&nbsp;Tomasz Salata ,&nbsp;Felix Herzog\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Current agricultural practices in Europe are increasingly aggravating societal and environmental safety concerns. This creates social and regulatory pressures on farmers, which can lead to declining material and social status of farmers, farmer discontent, and anti-regulation protests. These tensions are rooted in conflicting value systems for agricultural development, which can range from productivist pathways (i.e. valuing production above all else) to increasing multifunctionality pathways (i.e. valuing agriculture for its contribution to multiple economic, environmental and societal needs). It is largely unknown to what degree individual farms and agricultural landscapes are transitioning towards increasing productivism or multifunctionality in practice. Here, we mapped landscape changes and interviewed farmers (n = 274) to examine the diversity of agricultural development pathways in 17 study sites across Europe over the last 20 years (2000–2020). We also assessed the associations between the development pathways and farmers’ perceptions of socio-economic outcomes, namely job satisfaction, societal valuation, and economic performance. Farm-level development was largely aligned with productivist pathways, while landscape-level changes aligned more closely with an increasing multifunctionality pathway. Farmers on pathways of increasing multifunctionality did not perceive improved outcomes on livelihood indicators as compared to productivist farmers. Furthermore, farms on increasing multifunctionality pathways were concentrated in sites with very high management intensities that face strong pressure from environmental regulations, as well as low-intensity, mountainous sites, where opportunities for intensification are limited. These results suggest that current pathways that increase multifunctionality arise mostly by necessity. Successful agricultural transformation will therefore require policy to create enabling environments that provide socioeconomic benefits for farmers to increase multifunctionality, and a civil society and market conditions that value sustainable agriculture.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Environmental Change\",\"volume\":\"86 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102855\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378024000591/pdfft?md5=bf87064751fc94665ae8b9d5c78a23e6&pid=1-s2.0-S0959378024000591-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Environmental Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"6\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378024000591\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Environmental Change","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378024000591","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲当前的农业生产方式正日益加重社会和环境安全问题。这给农民带来了社会和监管压力,可能导致农民的物质和社会地位下降、农民不满和反监管抗议。这些矛盾的根源在于相互冲突的农业发展价值体系,其范围从生产主义途径(即重视生产高于一切)到多功能性途径(即重视农业对经济、环境和社会多种需求的贡献)。在实践中,各个农场和农业景观在多大程度上正在向提高生产率或多功能性过渡,这在很大程度上还不得而知。在此,我们绘制了景观变化图,并采访了农民(n = 274),以研究过去 20 年(2000-2020 年)欧洲 17 个研究地点农业发展途径的多样性。我们还评估了发展途径与农民对社会经济成果(即工作满意度、社会价值和经济绩效)的看法之间的关联。农场层面的发展在很大程度上与生产主义路径相一致,而景观层面的变化则与多功能性增加路径更为接近。与生产型农户相比,走多功能性增长道路的农户在生计指标方面的结果并没有得到改善。此外,多功能性增加路径上的农场主要集中在管理强度非常高的地区,这些地区面临着环境法规的强大压力,以及管理强度低、集约化机会有限的山区地区。这些结果表明,目前提高多功能性的途径主要是出于必要。因此,成功的农业转型需要政策创造有利环境,为农民增加多功能性提供社会经济效益,并创造重视可持续农业的公民社会和市场条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Divergent agricultural development pathways across farm and landscape scales in Europe: Implications for sustainability and farmer satisfaction

Divergent agricultural development pathways across farm and landscape scales in Europe: Implications for sustainability and farmer satisfaction

Current agricultural practices in Europe are increasingly aggravating societal and environmental safety concerns. This creates social and regulatory pressures on farmers, which can lead to declining material and social status of farmers, farmer discontent, and anti-regulation protests. These tensions are rooted in conflicting value systems for agricultural development, which can range from productivist pathways (i.e. valuing production above all else) to increasing multifunctionality pathways (i.e. valuing agriculture for its contribution to multiple economic, environmental and societal needs). It is largely unknown to what degree individual farms and agricultural landscapes are transitioning towards increasing productivism or multifunctionality in practice. Here, we mapped landscape changes and interviewed farmers (n = 274) to examine the diversity of agricultural development pathways in 17 study sites across Europe over the last 20 years (2000–2020). We also assessed the associations between the development pathways and farmers’ perceptions of socio-economic outcomes, namely job satisfaction, societal valuation, and economic performance. Farm-level development was largely aligned with productivist pathways, while landscape-level changes aligned more closely with an increasing multifunctionality pathway. Farmers on pathways of increasing multifunctionality did not perceive improved outcomes on livelihood indicators as compared to productivist farmers. Furthermore, farms on increasing multifunctionality pathways were concentrated in sites with very high management intensities that face strong pressure from environmental regulations, as well as low-intensity, mountainous sites, where opportunities for intensification are limited. These results suggest that current pathways that increase multifunctionality arise mostly by necessity. Successful agricultural transformation will therefore require policy to create enabling environments that provide socioeconomic benefits for farmers to increase multifunctionality, and a civil society and market conditions that value sustainable agriculture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Environmental Change
Global Environmental Change 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
18.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
146
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Global Environmental Change is a prestigious international journal that publishes articles of high quality, both theoretically and empirically rigorous. The journal aims to contribute to the understanding of global environmental change from the perspectives of human and policy dimensions. Specifically, it considers global environmental change as the result of processes occurring at the local level, but with wide-ranging impacts on various spatial, temporal, and socio-political scales. In terms of content, the journal seeks articles with a strong social science component. This includes research that examines the societal drivers and consequences of environmental change, as well as social and policy processes that aim to address these challenges. While the journal covers a broad range of topics, including biodiversity and ecosystem services, climate, coasts, food systems, land use and land cover, oceans, urban areas, and water resources, it also welcomes contributions that investigate the drivers, consequences, and management of other areas affected by environmental change. Overall, Global Environmental Change encourages research that deepens our understanding of the complex interactions between human activities and the environment, with the goal of informing policy and decision-making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信