Anne E.M. van den Oever , Stefano Puricelli , Daniele Costa , Nils Thonemann , Maeva Lavigne Philippot , Maarten Messagie
{"title":"在生命周期评估中重新审视臭氧消耗的挑战","authors":"Anne E.M. van den Oever , Stefano Puricelli , Daniele Costa , Nils Thonemann , Maeva Lavigne Philippot , Maarten Messagie","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent works have highlighted the interconnected impacts of stratospheric ozone depletion, ultraviolet (UV) radiation, and climate change on various sectors, including water quality, agriculture, human health, and biodiversity. Increased UV-B exposure has diverse environmental impacts, including potential benefits like enhanced plant resistance and reduced vitamin D deficiency. However, the quantification of these effects remains incomplete. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) serves to quantify the environmental impacts of product systems. This article revisits challenges related to ozone depletion in LCA by reviewing 15 Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) methods. It is shown that the currently available LCA ozone depletion practices are outdated. The combined effects of outdated background databases and incomplete impact assessment methods must be further investigated. Collaboration with atmospheric scientists and expansion of substances covered by characterization models are required. The study emphasizes the need to address interlinkages between impact categories and recommends climate scenario-dependent characterization for robust decision-making in an uncertain world.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100196"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000345/pdfft?md5=590861f5a34f8875655e5b1a71685f4c&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000345-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting the challenges of ozone depletion in life cycle assessment\",\"authors\":\"Anne E.M. van den Oever , Stefano Puricelli , Daniele Costa , Nils Thonemann , Maeva Lavigne Philippot , Maarten Messagie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Recent works have highlighted the interconnected impacts of stratospheric ozone depletion, ultraviolet (UV) radiation, and climate change on various sectors, including water quality, agriculture, human health, and biodiversity. Increased UV-B exposure has diverse environmental impacts, including potential benefits like enhanced plant resistance and reduced vitamin D deficiency. However, the quantification of these effects remains incomplete. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) serves to quantify the environmental impacts of product systems. This article revisits challenges related to ozone depletion in LCA by reviewing 15 Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) methods. It is shown that the currently available LCA ozone depletion practices are outdated. The combined effects of outdated background databases and incomplete impact assessment methods must be further investigated. Collaboration with atmospheric scientists and expansion of substances covered by characterization models are required. The study emphasizes the need to address interlinkages between impact categories and recommends climate scenario-dependent characterization for robust decision-making in an uncertain world.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Environmental Systems\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000345/pdfft?md5=590861f5a34f8875655e5b1a71685f4c&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000345-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Environmental Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000345\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
最近的研究突出了平流层臭氧消耗、紫外线(UV)辐射和气候变化对水质、农业、人类健康和生物多样性等各个领域的相互影响。紫外线-B 暴露的增加会对环境产生多种影响,包括增强植物抗性和减少维生素 D 缺乏症等潜在益处。然而,对这些影响的量化仍不完整。生命周期评估(LCA)可量化产品系统对环境的影响。本文通过回顾 15 种生命周期影响评估(LCIA)方法,重新审视了生命周期评估中与臭氧消耗有关的挑战。结果表明,目前可用的生命周期评估臭氧消耗方法已经过时。必须进一步调查过时的背景数据库和不完整的影响评估方法的综合影响。需要与大气科学家合作,并扩大表征模型所涵盖的物质范围。该研究强调需要解决影响类别之间的相互联系,并建议根据气候情景进行特征描述,以便在不确定的世界中做出稳健的决策。
Revisiting the challenges of ozone depletion in life cycle assessment
Recent works have highlighted the interconnected impacts of stratospheric ozone depletion, ultraviolet (UV) radiation, and climate change on various sectors, including water quality, agriculture, human health, and biodiversity. Increased UV-B exposure has diverse environmental impacts, including potential benefits like enhanced plant resistance and reduced vitamin D deficiency. However, the quantification of these effects remains incomplete. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) serves to quantify the environmental impacts of product systems. This article revisits challenges related to ozone depletion in LCA by reviewing 15 Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) methods. It is shown that the currently available LCA ozone depletion practices are outdated. The combined effects of outdated background databases and incomplete impact assessment methods must be further investigated. Collaboration with atmospheric scientists and expansion of substances covered by characterization models are required. The study emphasizes the need to address interlinkages between impact categories and recommends climate scenario-dependent characterization for robust decision-making in an uncertain world.