{"title":"单例设计研究的元分析:多层次模型的应用","authors":"Mikyung Shin, Stephanie L Hart, Michelle Simmons","doi":"10.1037/spq0000637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study describes the benefits and challenges of meta-analyses of single-case design research using multilevel modeling. The researchers illustrate procedures for conducting meta-analyses using four-level multilevel modeling through open-source R code. The demonstration uses data from multiple-baseline or multiple-probe across-participant single-case design studies (<i>n</i> = 21) on word problem instruction for students with learning disabilities published between 1975 and 2023. Researchers explore changes in levels and trends between adjacent phases (baseline vs. intervention and intervention vs. maintenance) using the sample data. The researchers conclude that word problem solving of students with learning disabilities varies based on the complexity of the word problem measures involving single-word problem, mixed-word problem, and generalization questions. These moderating effects differed across adjacent phases. These findings extend previous literature on meta-analyses methodology by describing how multilevel modeling can be used to compare the impacts of time-varying predictors within and across cases when analyzing single-case design studies. Future researchers may want to use this methodology to explore the roles of time-varying predictors as well as case or study-level moderators. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74763,"journal":{"name":"School psychology (Washington, D.C.)","volume":" ","pages":"625-635"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-analysis of single-case design research: Application of multilevel modeling.\",\"authors\":\"Mikyung Shin, Stephanie L Hart, Michelle Simmons\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/spq0000637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study describes the benefits and challenges of meta-analyses of single-case design research using multilevel modeling. The researchers illustrate procedures for conducting meta-analyses using four-level multilevel modeling through open-source R code. The demonstration uses data from multiple-baseline or multiple-probe across-participant single-case design studies (<i>n</i> = 21) on word problem instruction for students with learning disabilities published between 1975 and 2023. Researchers explore changes in levels and trends between adjacent phases (baseline vs. intervention and intervention vs. maintenance) using the sample data. The researchers conclude that word problem solving of students with learning disabilities varies based on the complexity of the word problem measures involving single-word problem, mixed-word problem, and generalization questions. These moderating effects differed across adjacent phases. These findings extend previous literature on meta-analyses methodology by describing how multilevel modeling can be used to compare the impacts of time-varying predictors within and across cases when analyzing single-case design studies. Future researchers may want to use this methodology to explore the roles of time-varying predictors as well as case or study-level moderators. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"School psychology (Washington, D.C.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"625-635\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"School psychology (Washington, D.C.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000637\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School psychology (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究介绍了使用多层次建模对单例设计研究进行荟萃分析的益处和挑战。研究人员通过开源 R 代码说明了使用四水平多水平建模进行荟萃分析的程序。该演示使用的数据来自 1975 年至 2023 年间发表的关于学习障碍学生文字问题教学的多基线或多探究跨参与者单案例设计研究(n = 21)。研究人员利用样本数据探讨了相邻阶段(基线与干预、干预与维持)之间的水平变化和趋势。研究人员得出结论,学习障碍学生的单词问题解决能力因单词问题、混合单词问题和概括问题等单词问题测量的复杂程度而异。这些调节作用在相邻阶段有所不同。这些研究结果扩展了以往有关荟萃分析方法的文献,描述了在分析单例设计研究时,如何使用多层次建模来比较时变预测因子在个案内和个案间的影响。未来的研究人员可能希望使用这种方法来探索时变预测因子以及个案或研究层面调节因子的作用。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
Meta-analysis of single-case design research: Application of multilevel modeling.
This study describes the benefits and challenges of meta-analyses of single-case design research using multilevel modeling. The researchers illustrate procedures for conducting meta-analyses using four-level multilevel modeling through open-source R code. The demonstration uses data from multiple-baseline or multiple-probe across-participant single-case design studies (n = 21) on word problem instruction for students with learning disabilities published between 1975 and 2023. Researchers explore changes in levels and trends between adjacent phases (baseline vs. intervention and intervention vs. maintenance) using the sample data. The researchers conclude that word problem solving of students with learning disabilities varies based on the complexity of the word problem measures involving single-word problem, mixed-word problem, and generalization questions. These moderating effects differed across adjacent phases. These findings extend previous literature on meta-analyses methodology by describing how multilevel modeling can be used to compare the impacts of time-varying predictors within and across cases when analyzing single-case design studies. Future researchers may want to use this methodology to explore the roles of time-varying predictors as well as case or study-level moderators. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).