{"title":"尼日利亚伊巴丹北地方政府区 5 岁以下儿童看护人接受疟疾疫苗的意愿。","authors":"Beliretu I Abdulkadir, Ikeoluwapo O Ajayi","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10870005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malaria vaccine is a potentially effective addition to the armamentarium for malaria control. The candidate RTS,S malaria vaccine has undergone phase III clinical trials and WHO has indicated that a policy recommendation is possible in 2015. Given the delays with adoption of other novel interventions including vaccines, there is a need to ensure that all elements that will inform the decision to adopt a malaria vaccine, including community willingness, will be available on time. This study was carried out to assess the willingness of caregivers of under-5 children to accept a malaria vaccine once available and recommended for use.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>427 consenting caregivers, selected using a cluster sampling technique, from five communities in Ibadan, Nigeria, participated in a questionnaire. In-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted among 47 key community members. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Chi-square and logistic regression at <i>p</i>≤0.05. Thematic content analysis was used to analyse the transcribed IDI data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of survey respondents was 29.8±5.8 years. Only 20.1% of the respondents had ever heard of malaria vaccine; 87.0% showed willingness to accept a malaria vaccine. Reasons stated for not willing included 'husband did not want immunisation' (73.6%), 'felt it might be expensive' (47.2%) and 'felt it might paralyse children' (24.5%). Nearly half (48.7%) of the respondents said that if vaccine is not given orally like polio vaccine it might not be accepted. Influence of community health workers was found to predict willingness to accept a malaria vaccine (OR: 0.316, 95% CI: 0.142-0.705). IDI participants were favourably disposed to introduction of a vaccine against malaria, although they had concerns about the formulation of the vaccine and possible adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Well-designed communication strategies implemented prior to the introduction of a malaria vaccine would be essential to foster a supportive environment for eventual adoption and acceptance thereof.</p>","PeriodicalId":74100,"journal":{"name":"MalariaWorld journal","volume":"6 ","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11107874/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Willingness to accept malaria vaccine among caregivers of under-5 children in Ibadan North Local Government Area, Nigeria.\",\"authors\":\"Beliretu I Abdulkadir, Ikeoluwapo O Ajayi\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/zenodo.10870005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malaria vaccine is a potentially effective addition to the armamentarium for malaria control. The candidate RTS,S malaria vaccine has undergone phase III clinical trials and WHO has indicated that a policy recommendation is possible in 2015. Given the delays with adoption of other novel interventions including vaccines, there is a need to ensure that all elements that will inform the decision to adopt a malaria vaccine, including community willingness, will be available on time. This study was carried out to assess the willingness of caregivers of under-5 children to accept a malaria vaccine once available and recommended for use.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>427 consenting caregivers, selected using a cluster sampling technique, from five communities in Ibadan, Nigeria, participated in a questionnaire. In-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted among 47 key community members. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Chi-square and logistic regression at <i>p</i>≤0.05. Thematic content analysis was used to analyse the transcribed IDI data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of survey respondents was 29.8±5.8 years. Only 20.1% of the respondents had ever heard of malaria vaccine; 87.0% showed willingness to accept a malaria vaccine. Reasons stated for not willing included 'husband did not want immunisation' (73.6%), 'felt it might be expensive' (47.2%) and 'felt it might paralyse children' (24.5%). Nearly half (48.7%) of the respondents said that if vaccine is not given orally like polio vaccine it might not be accepted. Influence of community health workers was found to predict willingness to accept a malaria vaccine (OR: 0.316, 95% CI: 0.142-0.705). IDI participants were favourably disposed to introduction of a vaccine against malaria, although they had concerns about the formulation of the vaccine and possible adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Well-designed communication strategies implemented prior to the introduction of a malaria vaccine would be essential to foster a supportive environment for eventual adoption and acceptance thereof.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MalariaWorld journal\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11107874/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MalariaWorld journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10870005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MalariaWorld journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10870005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:疟疾疫苗是对疟疾控制武器装备的一种潜在有效补充。候选的 RTS S 疟疾疫苗已进行了第三阶段临床试验,世卫组织表示有可能在 2015 年提出政策建议。鉴于包括疫苗在内的其他新型干预措施的采用都出现了延迟,因此有必要确保能够及时获得决定是否采用疟疾疫苗的所有信息,包括社区意愿。本研究旨在评估 5 岁以下儿童的看护者在疟疾疫苗上市并被推荐使用后接受疫苗的意愿。材料和方法:采用集群抽样技术从尼日利亚伊巴丹的五个社区选出 427 名同意接种疫苗的看护者参与问卷调查。对 47 名主要社区成员进行了深度访谈 (IDI)。在 p≤0.05 的条件下,使用描述性统计、卡方差和逻辑回归对数据进行了分析。对转录的 IDI 数据进行了主题内容分析:调查对象的平均年龄为(29.8±5.8)岁。只有 20.1%的受访者听说过疟疾疫苗;87.0%的受访者表示愿意接受疟疾疫苗。不愿意接种的原因包括 "丈夫不想接种"(73.6%)、"觉得可能会很贵"(47.2%)和 "觉得可能会让孩子瘫痪"(24.5%)。近一半(48.7%)的受访者表示,如果疫苗不像脊髓灰质炎疫苗那样口服,可能会不被接受。社区卫生工作者的影响可预测接受疟疾疫苗的意愿(OR:0.316,95% CI:0.142-0.705)。尽管 IDI 参与者对疫苗的配方和可能出现的不良反应表示担忧,但他们对引入疟疾疫苗持积极态度:结论:在引入疟疾疫苗之前实施精心设计的沟通策略对于营造最终采用和接受疫苗的支持性环境至关重要。
Willingness to accept malaria vaccine among caregivers of under-5 children in Ibadan North Local Government Area, Nigeria.
Background: Malaria vaccine is a potentially effective addition to the armamentarium for malaria control. The candidate RTS,S malaria vaccine has undergone phase III clinical trials and WHO has indicated that a policy recommendation is possible in 2015. Given the delays with adoption of other novel interventions including vaccines, there is a need to ensure that all elements that will inform the decision to adopt a malaria vaccine, including community willingness, will be available on time. This study was carried out to assess the willingness of caregivers of under-5 children to accept a malaria vaccine once available and recommended for use.
Materials and methods: 427 consenting caregivers, selected using a cluster sampling technique, from five communities in Ibadan, Nigeria, participated in a questionnaire. In-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted among 47 key community members. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Chi-square and logistic regression at p≤0.05. Thematic content analysis was used to analyse the transcribed IDI data.
Results: The mean age of survey respondents was 29.8±5.8 years. Only 20.1% of the respondents had ever heard of malaria vaccine; 87.0% showed willingness to accept a malaria vaccine. Reasons stated for not willing included 'husband did not want immunisation' (73.6%), 'felt it might be expensive' (47.2%) and 'felt it might paralyse children' (24.5%). Nearly half (48.7%) of the respondents said that if vaccine is not given orally like polio vaccine it might not be accepted. Influence of community health workers was found to predict willingness to accept a malaria vaccine (OR: 0.316, 95% CI: 0.142-0.705). IDI participants were favourably disposed to introduction of a vaccine against malaria, although they had concerns about the formulation of the vaccine and possible adverse events.
Conclusion: Well-designed communication strategies implemented prior to the introduction of a malaria vaccine would be essential to foster a supportive environment for eventual adoption and acceptance thereof.