唇腭裂儿童的龈骨整形术:牙槽骨移植的必要性。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Darius Balumuka, Gwendolyn E Daly, Kelsi Krakauer, Samantha Burch, Breanna Jedrzejewski, Alicia Johnson, Lori K Howell, Erik M Wolfswinkel
{"title":"唇腭裂儿童的龈骨整形术:牙槽骨移植的必要性。","authors":"Darius Balumuka, Gwendolyn E Daly, Kelsi Krakauer, Samantha Burch, Breanna Jedrzejewski, Alicia Johnson, Lori K Howell, Erik M Wolfswinkel","doi":"10.1177/10556656241256917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine the efficacy of gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP) in preventing alveolar bone grafting (ABG) among children with cleft lip and palate (CLP).</p><p><strong>Design/setting: </strong>Retrospective university hospital single center study.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Children with CLP treated with GPP from 2000-2015 were included. Those under eight years of age, without definitive conclusions regarding need for ABG or with incomplete data were excluded.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Included patients were analyzed for demographics, cleft type, age at GPP, associated cleft surgery, use of nasoalveolar molding (NAM), indication for ABG, operating surgeon and presence of residual alveolar fistula. T-tests and Fisher's exact tests were utilized for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>The need for ABG.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1682 children identified with CLP, 64 underwent GPP and met inclusion criteria. 78% of patients with CLP who underwent GPP were recommended for ABG. Those who received GPP at a younger age (<i>P</i> = .004) and at the time of initial cleft lip repair (<i>P</i> = .022) were less likely to be recommended for ABG. Patients with complete CLP were more likely to be recommended for ABG than patients with cleft lip and alveolus only (<i>P</i> = .015). The operating surgeon impacted the likelihood of ABG (<i>P</i> = .004). Patient gender, race, ethnicity, laterality, and NAM were not significantly associated with recommendation for ABG.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GPP does not preclude the need for ABG. Therefore, the success of ABG after GPP and maxillary growth restriction should be analyzed further to determine if GPP is a worthwhile adjunct to ABG in cleft care.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gingivoperiosteoplasty in Children with Cleft Lip and Palate: The Need for Alveolar Bone Grafting.\",\"authors\":\"Darius Balumuka, Gwendolyn E Daly, Kelsi Krakauer, Samantha Burch, Breanna Jedrzejewski, Alicia Johnson, Lori K Howell, Erik M Wolfswinkel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656241256917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine the efficacy of gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP) in preventing alveolar bone grafting (ABG) among children with cleft lip and palate (CLP).</p><p><strong>Design/setting: </strong>Retrospective university hospital single center study.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Children with CLP treated with GPP from 2000-2015 were included. Those under eight years of age, without definitive conclusions regarding need for ABG or with incomplete data were excluded.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Included patients were analyzed for demographics, cleft type, age at GPP, associated cleft surgery, use of nasoalveolar molding (NAM), indication for ABG, operating surgeon and presence of residual alveolar fistula. T-tests and Fisher's exact tests were utilized for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>The need for ABG.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1682 children identified with CLP, 64 underwent GPP and met inclusion criteria. 78% of patients with CLP who underwent GPP were recommended for ABG. Those who received GPP at a younger age (<i>P</i> = .004) and at the time of initial cleft lip repair (<i>P</i> = .022) were less likely to be recommended for ABG. Patients with complete CLP were more likely to be recommended for ABG than patients with cleft lip and alveolus only (<i>P</i> = .015). The operating surgeon impacted the likelihood of ABG (<i>P</i> = .004). Patient gender, race, ethnicity, laterality, and NAM were not significantly associated with recommendation for ABG.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GPP does not preclude the need for ABG. Therefore, the success of ABG after GPP and maxillary growth restriction should be analyzed further to determine if GPP is a worthwhile adjunct to ABG in cleft care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241256917\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241256917","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在确定牙龈骨整形术(GPP)在预防唇腭裂儿童牙槽骨移植术(ABG)方面的疗效:回顾性大学医院单中心研究:研究对象:2000-2015年间接受GPP治疗的唇腭裂儿童。排除年龄小于 8 岁、未明确诊断是否需要 ABG 或数据不完整的患者:对纳入的患者进行人口统计学、裂隙类型、GPP 时的年龄、相关裂隙手术、鼻齿槽成型 (NAM) 的使用、ABG 适应症、手术医生和是否存在残留齿槽瘘管的分析。主要结果指标:是否需要 ABG:结果:在 1682 名被确认患有 CLP 的儿童中,64 人接受了 GPP 并符合纳入标准。在接受 GPP 的 CLP 患者中,78% 被建议进行 ABG。年龄较小(P = .004)和初次唇裂修复时接受 GPP(P = .022)的患者被建议进行 ABG 的可能性较低。与仅有唇裂和齿槽的患者相比,完全性 CLP 患者更有可能被建议进行 ABG(P = .015)。手术外科医生影响 ABG 的可能性(P = .004)。患者的性别、种族、民族、侧位和 NAM 与推荐 ABG 的关系不大:结论:GPP 并不排除 ABG 的必要性。因此,应进一步分析 GPP 和上颌骨生长受限后 ABG 的成功率,以确定 GPP 是否值得在唇裂护理中作为 ABG 的辅助手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gingivoperiosteoplasty in Children with Cleft Lip and Palate: The Need for Alveolar Bone Grafting.

Objective: This study aimed to determine the efficacy of gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP) in preventing alveolar bone grafting (ABG) among children with cleft lip and palate (CLP).

Design/setting: Retrospective university hospital single center study.

Patients: Children with CLP treated with GPP from 2000-2015 were included. Those under eight years of age, without definitive conclusions regarding need for ABG or with incomplete data were excluded.

Interventions: Included patients were analyzed for demographics, cleft type, age at GPP, associated cleft surgery, use of nasoalveolar molding (NAM), indication for ABG, operating surgeon and presence of residual alveolar fistula. T-tests and Fisher's exact tests were utilized for statistical analysis.

Main outcome measure: The need for ABG.

Results: Of the 1682 children identified with CLP, 64 underwent GPP and met inclusion criteria. 78% of patients with CLP who underwent GPP were recommended for ABG. Those who received GPP at a younger age (P = .004) and at the time of initial cleft lip repair (P = .022) were less likely to be recommended for ABG. Patients with complete CLP were more likely to be recommended for ABG than patients with cleft lip and alveolus only (P = .015). The operating surgeon impacted the likelihood of ABG (P = .004). Patient gender, race, ethnicity, laterality, and NAM were not significantly associated with recommendation for ABG.

Conclusion: GPP does not preclude the need for ABG. Therefore, the success of ABG after GPP and maxillary growth restriction should be analyzed further to determine if GPP is a worthwhile adjunct to ABG in cleft care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信