提高临床实用性:基于深度学习的胚胎评分模型,用于非侵入性非整倍体预测。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Bing-Xin Ma, Guang-Nian Zhao, Zhi-Fei Yi, Yong-Le Yang, Lei Jin, Bo Huang
{"title":"提高临床实用性:基于深度学习的胚胎评分模型,用于非侵入性非整倍体预测。","authors":"Bing-Xin Ma, Guang-Nian Zhao, Zhi-Fei Yi, Yong-Le Yang, Lei Jin, Bo Huang","doi":"10.1186/s12958-024-01230-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The best method for selecting embryos ploidy is preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). However, it takes more labour, money, and experience. As such, more approachable, non- invasive techniques were still needed. Analyses driven by artificial intelligence have been presented recently to automate and objectify picture assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In present retrospective study, a total of 3448 biopsied blastocysts from 979 Time-lapse (TL)-PGT cycles were retrospectively analyzed. The \"intelligent data analysis (iDA) Score\" as a deep learning algorithm was used in TL incubators and assigned each blastocyst with a score between 1.0 and 9.9.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were observed in iDAScore among blastocysts with different ploidy. Additionally, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that higher scores were significantly correlated with euploidy (p < 0.001). The Area Under the Curve (AUC) of iDAScore alone for predicting euploidy embryo is 0.612, but rose to 0.688 by adding clinical and embryonic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provided additional information to strengthen the clinical applicability of iDAScore. This may provide a non-invasive and inexpensive alternative for patients who have no available blastocyst for biopsy or who are economically disadvantaged. However, the accuracy of embryo ploidy is still dependent on the results of next-generation sequencing technology (NGS) analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":21011,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11110431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing clinical utility: deep learning-based embryo scoring model for non-invasive aneuploidy prediction.\",\"authors\":\"Bing-Xin Ma, Guang-Nian Zhao, Zhi-Fei Yi, Yong-Le Yang, Lei Jin, Bo Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12958-024-01230-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The best method for selecting embryos ploidy is preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). However, it takes more labour, money, and experience. As such, more approachable, non- invasive techniques were still needed. Analyses driven by artificial intelligence have been presented recently to automate and objectify picture assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In present retrospective study, a total of 3448 biopsied blastocysts from 979 Time-lapse (TL)-PGT cycles were retrospectively analyzed. The \\\"intelligent data analysis (iDA) Score\\\" as a deep learning algorithm was used in TL incubators and assigned each blastocyst with a score between 1.0 and 9.9.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were observed in iDAScore among blastocysts with different ploidy. Additionally, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that higher scores were significantly correlated with euploidy (p < 0.001). The Area Under the Curve (AUC) of iDAScore alone for predicting euploidy embryo is 0.612, but rose to 0.688 by adding clinical and embryonic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provided additional information to strengthen the clinical applicability of iDAScore. This may provide a non-invasive and inexpensive alternative for patients who have no available blastocyst for biopsy or who are economically disadvantaged. However, the accuracy of embryo ploidy is still dependent on the results of next-generation sequencing technology (NGS) analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11110431/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-024-01230-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-024-01230-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:选择胚胎倍性的最佳方法是胚胎植入前非整倍体基因检测(PGT-A)。然而,这需要更多的人力、财力和经验。因此,仍然需要更多平易近人的非侵入性技术。最近出现了由人工智能驱动的分析方法,以实现图片评估的自动化和客观化:在本回顾性研究中,共对 979 个延时(TL)-PGT 周期中的 3448 个活检囊胚进行了回顾性分析。在 TL 培养箱中使用了深度学习算法 "智能数据分析(iDA)评分",并为每个囊胚评分 1.0 到 9.9 分:结果:不同倍性的囊胚的 iDAScore 有显著差异。此外,多变量逻辑回归分析表明,较高的分数与胚胎整倍体显著相关(p 结论:该研究为加强胚胎整倍体研究提供了更多信息:这项研究为加强 iDAScore 的临床适用性提供了更多信息。这为没有囊胚可供活检或经济条件较差的患者提供了一种无创、廉价的替代方法。不过,胚胎倍性的准确性仍取决于新一代测序技术(NGS)的分析结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing clinical utility: deep learning-based embryo scoring model for non-invasive aneuploidy prediction.

Background: The best method for selecting embryos ploidy is preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). However, it takes more labour, money, and experience. As such, more approachable, non- invasive techniques were still needed. Analyses driven by artificial intelligence have been presented recently to automate and objectify picture assessments.

Methods: In present retrospective study, a total of 3448 biopsied blastocysts from 979 Time-lapse (TL)-PGT cycles were retrospectively analyzed. The "intelligent data analysis (iDA) Score" as a deep learning algorithm was used in TL incubators and assigned each blastocyst with a score between 1.0 and 9.9.

Results: Significant differences were observed in iDAScore among blastocysts with different ploidy. Additionally, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that higher scores were significantly correlated with euploidy (p < 0.001). The Area Under the Curve (AUC) of iDAScore alone for predicting euploidy embryo is 0.612, but rose to 0.688 by adding clinical and embryonic characteristics.

Conclusions: This study provided additional information to strengthen the clinical applicability of iDAScore. This may provide a non-invasive and inexpensive alternative for patients who have no available blastocyst for biopsy or who are economically disadvantaged. However, the accuracy of embryo ploidy is still dependent on the results of next-generation sequencing technology (NGS) analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.30%
发文量
161
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology publishes and disseminates high-quality results from excellent research in the reproductive sciences. The journal publishes on topics covering gametogenesis, fertilization, early embryonic development, embryo-uterus interaction, reproductive development, pregnancy, uterine biology, endocrinology of reproduction, control of reproduction, reproductive immunology, neuroendocrinology, and veterinary and human reproductive medicine, including all vertebrate species.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信