{"title":"戈利木单抗对预后不良风险高的类风湿关节炎患者的疗效:利用聚类分析对GO-FORTH研究进行事后分析","authors":"Teita Asano, Yutaka Ishii, Hiroaki Tsuchiya, Junya Masuda","doi":"10.1093/mr/roae037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our objective was to assess the efficacy of golimumab (GLM) in patients with poor prognostic factors (PPFs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a post hoc analysis of GO-FORTH Phase 2/3 study. Cluster analysis was used to determine a patient population with high-risk patterns based on seven PPFs suggested by the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology recommendations and limited physical function. Radiographic progression, disease activity, and physical function and associated factors were evaluated over 52 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 261 rheumatoid arthritis patients were classified into three clusters characterised by high disease activity, high C-reactive protein levels, and limited physical function at baseline. GLM showed suppression of progressive modified total sharp score and decreases in Disease Activity Score 28-joint counts with erythrocyte sedimentation rate and Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index, in all the clusters. In Cluster C that showed almost all the PPF characteristics, a higher rate of change in modified total sharp score ≤0 was observed in GLM 100 mg group than in GLM 50 mg group (63.9% versus 46.5%). C-reactive protein concentration and physical limitation were associated with radiographic progression of Cluster C in GLM treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GLM was effective in rheumatoid arthritis patients in a subpopulation at high risk of PPF in GO-FORTH study. A dose of 100 mg may be more beneficial in preventing radiographic progression in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":18705,"journal":{"name":"Modern Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"1125-1134"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of golimumab in rheumatoid arthritis patients at high risk of a poor prognosis: Post hoc analysis of GO-FORTH study using cluster analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Teita Asano, Yutaka Ishii, Hiroaki Tsuchiya, Junya Masuda\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/mr/roae037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our objective was to assess the efficacy of golimumab (GLM) in patients with poor prognostic factors (PPFs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a post hoc analysis of GO-FORTH Phase 2/3 study. Cluster analysis was used to determine a patient population with high-risk patterns based on seven PPFs suggested by the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology recommendations and limited physical function. Radiographic progression, disease activity, and physical function and associated factors were evaluated over 52 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 261 rheumatoid arthritis patients were classified into three clusters characterised by high disease activity, high C-reactive protein levels, and limited physical function at baseline. GLM showed suppression of progressive modified total sharp score and decreases in Disease Activity Score 28-joint counts with erythrocyte sedimentation rate and Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index, in all the clusters. In Cluster C that showed almost all the PPF characteristics, a higher rate of change in modified total sharp score ≤0 was observed in GLM 100 mg group than in GLM 50 mg group (63.9% versus 46.5%). C-reactive protein concentration and physical limitation were associated with radiographic progression of Cluster C in GLM treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GLM was effective in rheumatoid arthritis patients in a subpopulation at high risk of PPF in GO-FORTH study. A dose of 100 mg may be more beneficial in preventing radiographic progression in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Modern Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1125-1134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Modern Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/mr/roae037\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mr/roae037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的评估戈利木单抗(GLM)对具有不良预后因素(PPFs)的患者的疗效:这是GO-FORTH 2/3期研究的一项事后分析。方法:这是GO-FORTH 2/3期研究的事后分析,根据EULAR建议的7个PPFs和有限的身体功能,采用聚类分析确定了具有高风险模式的患者人群。在52周的时间里,对患者的影像学进展、疾病活动、身体功能及相关因素进行了评估:总体而言,261 名 RA 患者被分为三个群组,其特征是基线时疾病活动度高、CRP 水平高和身体功能受限。GLM显示,在所有群组中,进行性改良总锐度评分(mTSS)均受到抑制,疾病活动度评分28-关节计数、红细胞沉降率和健康评估问卷-疾病指数均有所下降。在几乎显示出所有 PPF 特征的 C 组中,GLM 100 毫克组的ΔmTSS≤0 率高于 GLM 50 毫克组(63.9% 对 46.5%)。在GLM治疗中,CRP浓度和身体限制与C群的放射学进展有关:结论:在GO-FORTH研究中,GLM对PPF高风险亚群的RA患者有效。结论:在GO-FORTH研究中,GLM对PPF高风险亚群的RA患者有效,100毫克的剂量可能更有利于预防该人群的放射学进展。简短标题:不良预后因素对GLM疗效的影响。
Efficacy of golimumab in rheumatoid arthritis patients at high risk of a poor prognosis: Post hoc analysis of GO-FORTH study using cluster analysis.
Objectives: Our objective was to assess the efficacy of golimumab (GLM) in patients with poor prognostic factors (PPFs).
Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of GO-FORTH Phase 2/3 study. Cluster analysis was used to determine a patient population with high-risk patterns based on seven PPFs suggested by the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology recommendations and limited physical function. Radiographic progression, disease activity, and physical function and associated factors were evaluated over 52 weeks.
Results: Overall, 261 rheumatoid arthritis patients were classified into three clusters characterised by high disease activity, high C-reactive protein levels, and limited physical function at baseline. GLM showed suppression of progressive modified total sharp score and decreases in Disease Activity Score 28-joint counts with erythrocyte sedimentation rate and Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index, in all the clusters. In Cluster C that showed almost all the PPF characteristics, a higher rate of change in modified total sharp score ≤0 was observed in GLM 100 mg group than in GLM 50 mg group (63.9% versus 46.5%). C-reactive protein concentration and physical limitation were associated with radiographic progression of Cluster C in GLM treatment.
Conclusions: GLM was effective in rheumatoid arthritis patients in a subpopulation at high risk of PPF in GO-FORTH study. A dose of 100 mg may be more beneficial in preventing radiographic progression in this population.
期刊介绍:
Modern Rheumatology publishes original papers in English on research pertinent to rheumatology and associated areas such as pathology, physiology, clinical immunology, microbiology, biochemistry, experimental animal models, pharmacology, and orthopedic surgery.
Occasional reviews of topics which may be of wide interest to the readership will be accepted. In addition, concise papers of special scientific importance that represent definitive and original studies will be considered.
Modern Rheumatology is currently indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), Google Scholar, EBSCO, CSA, Academic OneFile, Current Abstracts, Elsevier Biobase, Gale, Health Reference Center Academic, OCLC, SCImago, Summon by Serial Solutions