母细胞瘤中 BRAF 基因突变的临床病理特征和诊断准确性:贝叶斯网络分析。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Ao-Bo Zhang, Jian-Yun Zhang, Yu-Ping Liu, Shuo Wang, Jia-Ying Bai, Li-Sha Sun, Tie-Jun Li
{"title":"母细胞瘤中 BRAF 基因突变的临床病理特征和诊断准确性:贝叶斯网络分析。","authors":"Ao-Bo Zhang,&nbsp;Jian-Yun Zhang,&nbsp;Yu-Ping Liu,&nbsp;Shuo Wang,&nbsp;Jia-Ying Bai,&nbsp;Li-Sha Sun,&nbsp;Tie-Jun Li","doi":"10.1111/jop.13542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to analyze the associations between clinicopathological characteristics and <i>BRAF</i> mutations in ameloblastoma (AM) patients and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Four electronic databases were searched from 2010 to 2024. The search terms used were specific to <i>BRAF</i> and AM. Observational studies or randomized controlled trials were considered eligible. The incidence of <i>BRAF</i> mutation and corresponding clinicopathological features in AM patients were subjected to Bayesian network analyses and diagnostic accuracy evaluation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 937 AM patients from 20 studies were included. The pooled prevalence of <i>BRAF</i> mutations in AM patients was 72%. According to the Bayesian network analysis, <i>BRAF</i> mutations are more likely to occur in younger (odds ratio [OR], 2.3; credible interval [CrI]: 1.2–4.5), mandible site (OR, 3.6; 95% CrI: 2.7–5.2), and unicystic (OR, 1.6; 95% CrI: 1.1–2.4) AM patients. Similarly, higher diagnostic accuracy was found in the younger, mandible, and unicystic AM groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The incidence, risk, and diagnostic accuracy of <i>BRAF</i> mutation in AM were greater in younger patients, those with mandible involvement, and those with unicystic AM than in patients with other clinicopathological features. In addition, there was a strong concordance in the diagnostic accuracy between molecular tests and immunohistochemical analysis.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinicopathological characteristics and diagnostic accuracy of BRAF mutations in ameloblastoma: A Bayesian network analysis\",\"authors\":\"Ao-Bo Zhang,&nbsp;Jian-Yun Zhang,&nbsp;Yu-Ping Liu,&nbsp;Shuo Wang,&nbsp;Jia-Ying Bai,&nbsp;Li-Sha Sun,&nbsp;Tie-Jun Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jop.13542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>This Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to analyze the associations between clinicopathological characteristics and <i>BRAF</i> mutations in ameloblastoma (AM) patients and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Four electronic databases were searched from 2010 to 2024. The search terms used were specific to <i>BRAF</i> and AM. Observational studies or randomized controlled trials were considered eligible. The incidence of <i>BRAF</i> mutation and corresponding clinicopathological features in AM patients were subjected to Bayesian network analyses and diagnostic accuracy evaluation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 937 AM patients from 20 studies were included. The pooled prevalence of <i>BRAF</i> mutations in AM patients was 72%. According to the Bayesian network analysis, <i>BRAF</i> mutations are more likely to occur in younger (odds ratio [OR], 2.3; credible interval [CrI]: 1.2–4.5), mandible site (OR, 3.6; 95% CrI: 2.7–5.2), and unicystic (OR, 1.6; 95% CrI: 1.1–2.4) AM patients. Similarly, higher diagnostic accuracy was found in the younger, mandible, and unicystic AM groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The incidence, risk, and diagnostic accuracy of <i>BRAF</i> mutation in AM were greater in younger patients, those with mandible involvement, and those with unicystic AM than in patients with other clinicopathological features. In addition, there was a strong concordance in the diagnostic accuracy between molecular tests and immunohistochemical analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jop.13542\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jop.13542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本贝叶斯网络荟萃分析旨在分析骨髓母细胞瘤(AM)患者的临床病理特征与BRAF突变之间的关联,并评估诊断的准确性:检索了2010年至2024年的四个电子数据库。所使用的检索词专门针对 BRAF 和 AM。观察性研究或随机对照试验均符合条件。对AM患者的BRAF突变发生率和相应的临床病理特征进行了贝叶斯网络分析和诊断准确性评估:结果:共纳入了 20 项研究中的 937 例 AM 患者。结果:20 项研究共纳入 937 例 AM 患者,BRAF 基因突变在 AM 患者中的总发生率为 72%。根据贝叶斯网络分析,BRAF突变更可能发生在年轻(比值比[OR],2.3;可信区间[CrI]:1.2-4.5)、下颌骨部位(OR,3.6;95% CrI:2.7-5.2)和单囊性(OR,1.6;95% CrI:1.1-2.4)的AM患者中。同样,年轻、下颌骨和单囊AM组的诊断准确率也较高:结论:与具有其他临床病理特征的患者相比,年轻患者、下颌骨受累患者和单囊AM患者的BRAF突变发生率、风险和诊断准确率更高。此外,分子检测与免疫组化分析的诊断准确性也非常一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinicopathological characteristics and diagnostic accuracy of BRAF mutations in ameloblastoma: A Bayesian network analysis

Objective

This Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to analyze the associations between clinicopathological characteristics and BRAF mutations in ameloblastoma (AM) patients and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy.

Materials and Methods

Four electronic databases were searched from 2010 to 2024. The search terms used were specific to BRAF and AM. Observational studies or randomized controlled trials were considered eligible. The incidence of BRAF mutation and corresponding clinicopathological features in AM patients were subjected to Bayesian network analyses and diagnostic accuracy evaluation.

Results

A total of 937 AM patients from 20 studies were included. The pooled prevalence of BRAF mutations in AM patients was 72%. According to the Bayesian network analysis, BRAF mutations are more likely to occur in younger (odds ratio [OR], 2.3; credible interval [CrI]: 1.2–4.5), mandible site (OR, 3.6; 95% CrI: 2.7–5.2), and unicystic (OR, 1.6; 95% CrI: 1.1–2.4) AM patients. Similarly, higher diagnostic accuracy was found in the younger, mandible, and unicystic AM groups.

Conclusions

The incidence, risk, and diagnostic accuracy of BRAF mutation in AM were greater in younger patients, those with mandible involvement, and those with unicystic AM than in patients with other clinicopathological features. In addition, there was a strong concordance in the diagnostic accuracy between molecular tests and immunohistochemical analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信