Maximilian Stahlke;Tobias Feigl;Sebastian Kram;Bjoern M. Eskofier;Christopher Mutschler
{"title":"基于不确定性的无线电定位指纹模型监测","authors":"Maximilian Stahlke;Tobias Feigl;Sebastian Kram;Bjoern M. Eskofier;Christopher Mutschler","doi":"10.1109/JISPIN.2024.3398568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indoor radio environments often consist of areas with mixed propagation conditions. In line-of-sight (LoS)-dominated areas, classic time-of-flight (ToF) methods reliably return accurate positions, while in nonline-of-sight (NLoS) dominated areas (AI-based) fingerprinting methods are required. However, fingerprinting methods are only cost-efficient if they are used exclusively in NLoS-dominated areas due to their expensive life cycle management. Systems that are both accurate and cost-efficient in LoS- and NLoS-dominated areas require identification of those areas to select the optimal localization method. To enable a reliable and robust life cycle management of fingerprinting, we must identify altered fingerprints to trigger update processes. In this article, we propose methods for uncertainty estimation of AI-based fingerprinting to determine its spatial boundaries and validity. Our experiments show that we can successfully identify spatial boundaries of the fingerprinting models and detect corrupted areas. In contrast to the state-of-the-art, our approach employs an intrinsic identification through out-of-distribution (OOD) detection, rendering external detection approaches unnecessary.","PeriodicalId":100621,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Journal of Indoor and Seamless Positioning and Navigation","volume":"2 ","pages":"166-176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10526425","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncertainty-Based Fingerprinting Model Monitoring for Radio Localization\",\"authors\":\"Maximilian Stahlke;Tobias Feigl;Sebastian Kram;Bjoern M. Eskofier;Christopher Mutschler\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/JISPIN.2024.3398568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Indoor radio environments often consist of areas with mixed propagation conditions. In line-of-sight (LoS)-dominated areas, classic time-of-flight (ToF) methods reliably return accurate positions, while in nonline-of-sight (NLoS) dominated areas (AI-based) fingerprinting methods are required. However, fingerprinting methods are only cost-efficient if they are used exclusively in NLoS-dominated areas due to their expensive life cycle management. Systems that are both accurate and cost-efficient in LoS- and NLoS-dominated areas require identification of those areas to select the optimal localization method. To enable a reliable and robust life cycle management of fingerprinting, we must identify altered fingerprints to trigger update processes. In this article, we propose methods for uncertainty estimation of AI-based fingerprinting to determine its spatial boundaries and validity. Our experiments show that we can successfully identify spatial boundaries of the fingerprinting models and detect corrupted areas. In contrast to the state-of-the-art, our approach employs an intrinsic identification through out-of-distribution (OOD) detection, rendering external detection approaches unnecessary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Journal of Indoor and Seamless Positioning and Navigation\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"166-176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10526425\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Journal of Indoor and Seamless Positioning and Navigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10526425/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Journal of Indoor and Seamless Positioning and Navigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10526425/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
室内无线电环境通常由混合传播条件的区域组成。在以视距(LoS)为主的区域,传统的飞行时间(ToF)方法可以可靠地返回准确位置,而在以非视距(NLoS)为主的区域,则需要基于人工智能的指纹识别方法。然而,由于指纹识别方法的生命周期管理成本高昂,因此只有在 NLoS 占主导地位的区域专门使用这种方法才具有成本效益。要想在 LoS 和 NLoS 占主导地位的区域实现既准确又经济高效的系统,就必须识别这些区域,以选择最佳定位方法。为了对指纹进行可靠、稳健的生命周期管理,我们必须识别已更改的指纹,以触发更新过程。在本文中,我们提出了对基于人工智能的指纹识别进行不确定性估计的方法,以确定其空间边界和有效性。我们的实验表明,我们可以成功识别指纹模型的空间边界,并检测出损坏的区域。与最先进的方法相比,我们的方法通过分布外检测(OOD)进行内在识别,从而无需外部检测方法。
Uncertainty-Based Fingerprinting Model Monitoring for Radio Localization
Indoor radio environments often consist of areas with mixed propagation conditions. In line-of-sight (LoS)-dominated areas, classic time-of-flight (ToF) methods reliably return accurate positions, while in nonline-of-sight (NLoS) dominated areas (AI-based) fingerprinting methods are required. However, fingerprinting methods are only cost-efficient if they are used exclusively in NLoS-dominated areas due to their expensive life cycle management. Systems that are both accurate and cost-efficient in LoS- and NLoS-dominated areas require identification of those areas to select the optimal localization method. To enable a reliable and robust life cycle management of fingerprinting, we must identify altered fingerprints to trigger update processes. In this article, we propose methods for uncertainty estimation of AI-based fingerprinting to determine its spatial boundaries and validity. Our experiments show that we can successfully identify spatial boundaries of the fingerprinting models and detect corrupted areas. In contrast to the state-of-the-art, our approach employs an intrinsic identification through out-of-distribution (OOD) detection, rendering external detection approaches unnecessary.