数学教师在网上研究与实践伙伴关系中的互动模式和角色转变:社会网络分析

IF 8.9 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Haili Liang , Chunxia Qi , Rongjin Huang , Haode Zuo , Jiashan He
{"title":"数学教师在网上研究与实践伙伴关系中的互动模式和角色转变:社会网络分析","authors":"Haili Liang ,&nbsp;Chunxia Qi ,&nbsp;Rongjin Huang ,&nbsp;Haode Zuo ,&nbsp;Jiashan He","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Research–Practice Partnerships (RPPs), in which researchers and teachers come together with the shared aim of driving educational improvement, have lately gained recognition in the education community. Whilst studies have demonstrated the positive effects of RPPs, potential challenges in establishing long-term and mutually beneficial RPPs have been reported. To understand these challenges, the present study explores dynamic changes in team interaction patterns and roles using Social Network Analysis (SNA), then employs qualitative analysis to elaborate the mechanisms underlying these changes and resulting outcomes. The visual and quantitative results of the SNA reveal that interaction patterns shifted from a researcher-centered (hierarchical) pattern to a decentralized pattern, with increasing numbers of participants exhibiting a higher level of activity and exchange over time across the four discussions in a RPP. As for role changes, researchers played more of a leading role in the first two discussions, while teachers played a more equal role in subsequent discussions. The qualitative findings identify some key factors that lead to the changes in interaction patterns and roles, including: the process of negotiating meaning through lesson study; the establishment of trust between participants; and a concern for how role changes may positively impact teachers' and researchers’ professional development. These findings thus offer insights into how to create more effective and long-lasting RPPs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"218 ","pages":"Article 105077"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mathematics teachers' interaction patterns and role changes in online research-practice partnerships: A social network analysis\",\"authors\":\"Haili Liang ,&nbsp;Chunxia Qi ,&nbsp;Rongjin Huang ,&nbsp;Haode Zuo ,&nbsp;Jiashan He\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Research–Practice Partnerships (RPPs), in which researchers and teachers come together with the shared aim of driving educational improvement, have lately gained recognition in the education community. Whilst studies have demonstrated the positive effects of RPPs, potential challenges in establishing long-term and mutually beneficial RPPs have been reported. To understand these challenges, the present study explores dynamic changes in team interaction patterns and roles using Social Network Analysis (SNA), then employs qualitative analysis to elaborate the mechanisms underlying these changes and resulting outcomes. The visual and quantitative results of the SNA reveal that interaction patterns shifted from a researcher-centered (hierarchical) pattern to a decentralized pattern, with increasing numbers of participants exhibiting a higher level of activity and exchange over time across the four discussions in a RPP. As for role changes, researchers played more of a leading role in the first two discussions, while teachers played a more equal role in subsequent discussions. The qualitative findings identify some key factors that lead to the changes in interaction patterns and roles, including: the process of negotiating meaning through lesson study; the establishment of trust between participants; and a concern for how role changes may positively impact teachers' and researchers’ professional development. These findings thus offer insights into how to create more effective and long-lasting RPPs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Education\",\"volume\":\"218 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105077\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131524000915\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131524000915","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究与实践合作伙伴关系(RPPs)是研究人员和教师为推动教育改进的共同目标而结成的伙伴关系,近来已得到教育界的认可。研究表明,研究与实践伙伴关系具有积极的作用,但也有报告指出,在建立长期互利的研究与实践伙伴关系方面存在潜在的挑战。为了了解这些挑战,本研究利用社会网络分析(SNA)探讨了团队互动模式和角色的动态变化,然后采用定性分析来阐述这些变化和由此产生的结果的内在机制。SNA 的可视化和定量结果显示,互动模式从以研究人员为中心(等级制)的模式转变为分散模式,在 RPP 的四次讨论中,随着时间的推移,越来越多的参与者表现出更高水平的活动和交流。在角色变化方面,研究人员在前两次讨论中更多地扮演了主导角色,而教师在随后的讨论中则扮演了更加平等的角色。定性研究结果发现了导致互动模式和角色变化的一些关键因素,包括:通过课例研究协商意义的过程;参与者之间建立信任;以及对角色变化如何对教师和研究人员的专业发展产生积极影响的关注。因此,这些研究结果为如何创建更有效、更持久的研究伙伴关系提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mathematics teachers' interaction patterns and role changes in online research-practice partnerships: A social network analysis

Research–Practice Partnerships (RPPs), in which researchers and teachers come together with the shared aim of driving educational improvement, have lately gained recognition in the education community. Whilst studies have demonstrated the positive effects of RPPs, potential challenges in establishing long-term and mutually beneficial RPPs have been reported. To understand these challenges, the present study explores dynamic changes in team interaction patterns and roles using Social Network Analysis (SNA), then employs qualitative analysis to elaborate the mechanisms underlying these changes and resulting outcomes. The visual and quantitative results of the SNA reveal that interaction patterns shifted from a researcher-centered (hierarchical) pattern to a decentralized pattern, with increasing numbers of participants exhibiting a higher level of activity and exchange over time across the four discussions in a RPP. As for role changes, researchers played more of a leading role in the first two discussions, while teachers played a more equal role in subsequent discussions. The qualitative findings identify some key factors that lead to the changes in interaction patterns and roles, including: the process of negotiating meaning through lesson study; the establishment of trust between participants; and a concern for how role changes may positively impact teachers' and researchers’ professional development. These findings thus offer insights into how to create more effective and long-lasting RPPs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信