选择碳封存盐层的标准和工作流程

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Catherine Callas , J. Steve Davis , Sarah D. Saltzer , Sam S. Hashemi , Gege Wen , Peter O. Gold , Mark D. Zoback , Sally M. Benson , Anthony R. Kovscek
{"title":"选择碳封存盐层的标准和工作流程","authors":"Catherine Callas ,&nbsp;J. Steve Davis ,&nbsp;Sarah D. Saltzer ,&nbsp;Sam S. Hashemi ,&nbsp;Gege Wen ,&nbsp;Peter O. Gold ,&nbsp;Mark D. Zoback ,&nbsp;Sally M. Benson ,&nbsp;Anthony R. Kovscek","doi":"10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is an essential greenhouse gas mitigation strategy. Consolidating CO<sub>2</sub> sources and sinks can enable the widespread adoption of CCS, and the success of hub-scale projects depends on finding an appropriate sequestration complex. This work developed a criteria-driven framework to assess the potential suitability of saline formations for carbon storage. The workflow uses a three-stage process that screens, ranks, and characterizes potential saline storage formations based on three categories: (1) capacity and injectivity optimization, (2) retention and geomechanical risk minimization, and (3) siting and economic constraints. In this framework, data confidence has been incorporated into site ranking, which provides the user with information about the degree of uncertainty associated with the evaluation. The methodology can be applied to sites in various geological and geographical environments and incorporates general and project-specific criteria. This quantitative, criteria-driven approach was applied to two areas of interest in the Gulf of Mexico, and one site was identified for further assessment. In addition, this workflow was applied to four existing CCS projects— Sleipner, IBDP, In Salah, and Snøhvit—to see how they would have scored and ranked pre-development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":334,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 104138"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Criteria and workflow for selecting saline formations for carbon storage\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Callas ,&nbsp;J. Steve Davis ,&nbsp;Sarah D. Saltzer ,&nbsp;Sam S. Hashemi ,&nbsp;Gege Wen ,&nbsp;Peter O. Gold ,&nbsp;Mark D. Zoback ,&nbsp;Sally M. Benson ,&nbsp;Anthony R. Kovscek\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is an essential greenhouse gas mitigation strategy. Consolidating CO<sub>2</sub> sources and sinks can enable the widespread adoption of CCS, and the success of hub-scale projects depends on finding an appropriate sequestration complex. This work developed a criteria-driven framework to assess the potential suitability of saline formations for carbon storage. The workflow uses a three-stage process that screens, ranks, and characterizes potential saline storage formations based on three categories: (1) capacity and injectivity optimization, (2) retention and geomechanical risk minimization, and (3) siting and economic constraints. In this framework, data confidence has been incorporated into site ranking, which provides the user with information about the degree of uncertainty associated with the evaluation. The methodology can be applied to sites in various geological and geographical environments and incorporates general and project-specific criteria. This quantitative, criteria-driven approach was applied to two areas of interest in the Gulf of Mexico, and one site was identified for further assessment. In addition, this workflow was applied to four existing CCS projects— Sleipner, IBDP, In Salah, and Snøhvit—to see how they would have scored and ranked pre-development.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"volume\":\"135 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624000811\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624000811","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

碳捕集与封存(CCS)是一项重要的温室气体减排战略。整合二氧化碳源和汇可以促进 CCS 的广泛采用,而中心规模项目的成功取决于找到合适的封存综合体。这项工作开发了一个标准驱动框架,用于评估盐碱地层用于碳封存的潜在适宜性。该工作流程采用三阶段流程,根据三个类别对潜在的盐类封存地层进行筛选、排序和特征描述:(1)容量和注入率优化;(2)保留和地质力学风险最小化;(3)选址和经济限制。在这一框架中,数据置信度被纳入选址排名,为用户提供了与评估相关的不确定性程度的信息。该方法可应用于各种地质和地理环境中的地点,并包含一般标准和特定项目标准。这种以标准为导向的定量方法被应用于墨西哥湾的两个相关区域,其中一个地点被确定为需要进一步评估的地点。此外,该工作流程还应用于四个现有的 CCS 项目--Sleipner、IBDP、In Salah 和 Snøhvit,以了解它们在开发前的评分和排名情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Criteria and workflow for selecting saline formations for carbon storage

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is an essential greenhouse gas mitigation strategy. Consolidating CO2 sources and sinks can enable the widespread adoption of CCS, and the success of hub-scale projects depends on finding an appropriate sequestration complex. This work developed a criteria-driven framework to assess the potential suitability of saline formations for carbon storage. The workflow uses a three-stage process that screens, ranks, and characterizes potential saline storage formations based on three categories: (1) capacity and injectivity optimization, (2) retention and geomechanical risk minimization, and (3) siting and economic constraints. In this framework, data confidence has been incorporated into site ranking, which provides the user with information about the degree of uncertainty associated with the evaluation. The methodology can be applied to sites in various geological and geographical environments and incorporates general and project-specific criteria. This quantitative, criteria-driven approach was applied to two areas of interest in the Gulf of Mexico, and one site was identified for further assessment. In addition, this workflow was applied to four existing CCS projects— Sleipner, IBDP, In Salah, and Snøhvit—to see how they would have scored and ranked pre-development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
199
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is a peer reviewed journal focusing on scientific and engineering developments in greenhouse gas control through capture and storage at large stationary emitters in the power sector and in other major resource, manufacturing and production industries. The Journal covers all greenhouse gas emissions within the power and industrial sectors, and comprises both technical and non-technical related literature in one volume. Original research, review and comments papers are included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信