公众如何看待人工智能?不同技术背景下的技术框架调查

IF 7.8 1区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Shangrui Wang , Zheng Liang
{"title":"公众如何看待人工智能?不同技术背景下的技术框架调查","authors":"Shangrui Wang ,&nbsp;Zheng Liang","doi":"10.1016/j.giq.2024.101939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Public participation is crucial for the governance of artificial intelligence (AI). However, the public is typically portrayed as a passive recipient in practice, and little is known about their expectations, assumptions and knowledge about AI. Based on the theoretical lens of technological frames, and using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and content coding on 114,393 relevant comments, the article explores public perceptions of the nature of AI, AI strategy and AI in use, and further compares the discourse before and after the launch of ChatGPT. The findings show that ChatGPT amplifies public enthusiasm and expectations of AI, as well as concerns and fears, and draws attention to national competition. However, public discourses are generally conflicting and preliminary, characterized by abstract and grandiose narratives, posing challenges in reaching consensus and generating practical insights. Therefore, this analysis raises serious concerns over public participation in AI governance, as the public not only faces limited channels for substantive involvement but also struggles to articulate effective discourses in the public sphere.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48258,"journal":{"name":"Government Information Quarterly","volume":"41 2","pages":"Article 101939"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What does the public think about artificial intelligence? An investigation of technological frames in different technological context\",\"authors\":\"Shangrui Wang ,&nbsp;Zheng Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.giq.2024.101939\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Public participation is crucial for the governance of artificial intelligence (AI). However, the public is typically portrayed as a passive recipient in practice, and little is known about their expectations, assumptions and knowledge about AI. Based on the theoretical lens of technological frames, and using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and content coding on 114,393 relevant comments, the article explores public perceptions of the nature of AI, AI strategy and AI in use, and further compares the discourse before and after the launch of ChatGPT. The findings show that ChatGPT amplifies public enthusiasm and expectations of AI, as well as concerns and fears, and draws attention to national competition. However, public discourses are generally conflicting and preliminary, characterized by abstract and grandiose narratives, posing challenges in reaching consensus and generating practical insights. Therefore, this analysis raises serious concerns over public participation in AI governance, as the public not only faces limited channels for substantive involvement but also struggles to articulate effective discourses in the public sphere.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Government Information Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"41 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 101939\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Government Information Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X24000315\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Government Information Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X24000315","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公众参与对于人工智能(AI)的管理至关重要。然而,在实践中,公众通常被描绘成被动的接受者,人们对他们对人工智能的期望、假设和知识知之甚少。文章从技术框架的理论视角出发,利用 Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) 技术和对 114393 条相关评论的内容编码,探讨了公众对人工智能本质、人工智能战略和人工智能使用的看法,并进一步比较了 ChatGPT 推出前后的讨论情况。研究结果表明,ChatGPT 放大了公众对人工智能的热情和期望,以及担忧和恐惧,并引起了对国家竞争的关注。然而,公众论述普遍存在冲突和初步性,以抽象和宏大叙事为特征,给达成共识和产生实际见解带来了挑战。因此,本分析提出了对公众参与人工智能治理的严重关切,因为公众不仅面临着实质性参与渠道有限的问题,而且还难以在公共领域表达有效的论述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What does the public think about artificial intelligence? An investigation of technological frames in different technological context

Public participation is crucial for the governance of artificial intelligence (AI). However, the public is typically portrayed as a passive recipient in practice, and little is known about their expectations, assumptions and knowledge about AI. Based on the theoretical lens of technological frames, and using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and content coding on 114,393 relevant comments, the article explores public perceptions of the nature of AI, AI strategy and AI in use, and further compares the discourse before and after the launch of ChatGPT. The findings show that ChatGPT amplifies public enthusiasm and expectations of AI, as well as concerns and fears, and draws attention to national competition. However, public discourses are generally conflicting and preliminary, characterized by abstract and grandiose narratives, posing challenges in reaching consensus and generating practical insights. Therefore, this analysis raises serious concerns over public participation in AI governance, as the public not only faces limited channels for substantive involvement but also struggles to articulate effective discourses in the public sphere.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Government Information Quarterly
Government Information Quarterly INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Government Information Quarterly (GIQ) delves into the convergence of policy, information technology, government, and the public. It explores the impact of policies on government information flows, the role of technology in innovative government services, and the dynamic between citizens and governing bodies in the digital age. GIQ serves as a premier journal, disseminating high-quality research and insights that bridge the realms of policy, information technology, government, and public engagement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信