使用粘合剂系统的新方法可提高纤维桩与牙根之间的粘合强度。

Brazilian dental journal Pub Date : 2024-05-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0103-6440202405720
Rafael Nesello, Leonardo Thomasi Jahnke, Wesley Misael Krabbe, Charles André Dall Agnol Júnior, Manuela Favarin Santini, Lucas Machado Silveira, Leonardo Miotti, Marcus Vinícius Reis Só, Ricardo Abreu da Rosa
{"title":"使用粘合剂系统的新方法可提高纤维桩与牙根之间的粘合强度。","authors":"Rafael Nesello, Leonardo Thomasi Jahnke, Wesley Misael Krabbe, Charles André Dall Agnol Júnior, Manuela Favarin Santini, Lucas Machado Silveira, Leonardo Miotti, Marcus Vinícius Reis Só, Ricardo Abreu da Rosa","doi":"10.1590/0103-6440202405720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated a new method of adhesive system application on the bond strength between fiber post and root dentin using two adhesive systems. The canals of sixty bovine incisors were prepared and obturated. The roots were divided into six groups (n=10) according to the adhesive system (Clearfil SE - CSE and Single Bond Universal - SBU) and the application strategy (microbrush - MB; rotary brush - RB; and ultrasonic tip - US). The glass fiber posts were cemented with resin cement (RelyX ARC). The roots were sectioned perpendicularly to their long axis, and three slices per root were obtained. Previously to the push-out test, confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) was performed to illustrate the interfacial adaptation of the cement to the root canal walls. Failure patterns were analyzed with 40x magnification. Shapiro-Wilk indicated a normal distribution of the data. The bond strength values were compared using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests. Student's T test analyzed the differences between the adhesive systems within each third and protocol. A significance level of 5% was used. CSE with RB showed higher mean bond strength values compared to MB (conventional technique) (P < 0.05). US application resulted in intermediate bond strength values for CSE (P > 0.05). The application of SBU using RB generated higher mean bond strength values compared to MB and US (P < 0.05). Adhesive failures were predominant (65.5%). CSE and SBU application with the new rotary brush improved the bond strength of fiber posts to root dentin compared to the conventional strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":101363,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian dental journal","volume":"35 ","pages":"e245720"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11086611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new method of adhesive system application improves the bond strength between fiber post and root dentin.\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Nesello, Leonardo Thomasi Jahnke, Wesley Misael Krabbe, Charles André Dall Agnol Júnior, Manuela Favarin Santini, Lucas Machado Silveira, Leonardo Miotti, Marcus Vinícius Reis Só, Ricardo Abreu da Rosa\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0103-6440202405720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluated a new method of adhesive system application on the bond strength between fiber post and root dentin using two adhesive systems. The canals of sixty bovine incisors were prepared and obturated. The roots were divided into six groups (n=10) according to the adhesive system (Clearfil SE - CSE and Single Bond Universal - SBU) and the application strategy (microbrush - MB; rotary brush - RB; and ultrasonic tip - US). The glass fiber posts were cemented with resin cement (RelyX ARC). The roots were sectioned perpendicularly to their long axis, and three slices per root were obtained. Previously to the push-out test, confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) was performed to illustrate the interfacial adaptation of the cement to the root canal walls. Failure patterns were analyzed with 40x magnification. Shapiro-Wilk indicated a normal distribution of the data. The bond strength values were compared using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests. Student's T test analyzed the differences between the adhesive systems within each third and protocol. A significance level of 5% was used. CSE with RB showed higher mean bond strength values compared to MB (conventional technique) (P < 0.05). US application resulted in intermediate bond strength values for CSE (P > 0.05). The application of SBU using RB generated higher mean bond strength values compared to MB and US (P < 0.05). Adhesive failures were predominant (65.5%). CSE and SBU application with the new rotary brush improved the bond strength of fiber posts to root dentin compared to the conventional strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian dental journal\",\"volume\":\"35 \",\"pages\":\"e245720\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11086611/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian dental journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202405720\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202405720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究使用两种粘合剂系统评估了一种新的粘合剂系统应用方法对纤维桩和根部牙本质之间粘合强度的影响。对六十颗牛门牙的根管进行了制备和封闭。根据粘合剂系统(Clearfil SE - CSE 和 Single Bond Universal - SBU)和应用策略(微刷 - MB;旋转刷 - RB;超声波头 - US),将牙根分为六组(n=10)。玻璃纤维柱用树脂粘结剂(RelyX ARC)粘结。牙根垂直于其长轴切片,每个牙根切三片。在进行挤出试验之前,先进行激光扫描共聚焦显微镜(CLSM)检查,以显示粘接剂与根管壁的界面适应性。用 40 倍放大镜分析了破坏模式。Shapiro-Wilk 表明数据呈正态分布。使用单因素方差分析和 Tukey's 检验比较了粘接强度值。学生 T 检验分析了每三分之一和每一方案中粘合剂系统之间的差异。显著性水平为 5%。与 MB(传统技术)相比,使用 RB 的 CSE 显示出更高的平均粘接强度值(P < 0.05)。使用 US 后,CSE 的粘接强度值处于中等水平(P > 0.05)。与 MB 和 US 相比,使用 RB 施用 SBU 产生的平均粘接强度值更高(P < 0.05)。粘合剂失效是主要原因(65.5%)。与传统方法相比,使用新型旋转刷涂抹 CSE 和 SBU 可以提高纤维桩与根部牙本质的粘结强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A new method of adhesive system application improves the bond strength between fiber post and root dentin.

This study evaluated a new method of adhesive system application on the bond strength between fiber post and root dentin using two adhesive systems. The canals of sixty bovine incisors were prepared and obturated. The roots were divided into six groups (n=10) according to the adhesive system (Clearfil SE - CSE and Single Bond Universal - SBU) and the application strategy (microbrush - MB; rotary brush - RB; and ultrasonic tip - US). The glass fiber posts were cemented with resin cement (RelyX ARC). The roots were sectioned perpendicularly to their long axis, and three slices per root were obtained. Previously to the push-out test, confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) was performed to illustrate the interfacial adaptation of the cement to the root canal walls. Failure patterns were analyzed with 40x magnification. Shapiro-Wilk indicated a normal distribution of the data. The bond strength values were compared using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests. Student's T test analyzed the differences between the adhesive systems within each third and protocol. A significance level of 5% was used. CSE with RB showed higher mean bond strength values compared to MB (conventional technique) (P < 0.05). US application resulted in intermediate bond strength values for CSE (P > 0.05). The application of SBU using RB generated higher mean bond strength values compared to MB and US (P < 0.05). Adhesive failures were predominant (65.5%). CSE and SBU application with the new rotary brush improved the bond strength of fiber posts to root dentin compared to the conventional strategy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信