Fahd Alsalleeh, Fatima Y Albishry, Asrar S Aleyiydi, Farah S Aldossari, Norah H Alharbi, Maha Alghofaily, Riyadh Althumairy
{"title":"在全身麻醉下对有特殊医疗需求者进行非手术牙髓治疗的结果:一项观察性研究。","authors":"Fahd Alsalleeh, Fatima Y Albishry, Asrar S Aleyiydi, Farah S Aldossari, Norah H Alharbi, Maha Alghofaily, Riyadh Althumairy","doi":"10.1038/s41405-024-00224-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>The alarming rise in the number of people with special health care needs (SHCNs) necessitates a paradigm shift in how to approach their oral health needs. General anesthesia (GA) is a valuable technique for facilitating dental procedures in patients with SHCNs who may not be able to tolerate treatment without it. The aim was to assess nonsurgical endodontic treatment and outcomes in patients with SHCNs performed under GA.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Seventy-eight permanent teeth in 33 patients who received nonsurgical endodontic treatment under GA were included between 2018 and 2022 in SHCNs hospital clinics. The demographic data, types of SHCNs, pulpal and periapical diagnosis, type of treatment, and material used were analyzed. All patients were recalled for clinical and radiographic examinations. Pre-treatment and recall periapical radiographs were evaluated and scored using the Periapical Index (PAI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Autism and Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder were 39.4% of patients treated. Most treatments delivered were primary nonsurgical root canal treatment (95%). Warm vertical compaction of gutta-percha for obturation accounted for 88% of cases treated. Single cone obturation technique was used in 9 cases (12%) utilizing tricalcium silicate sealer. At the recall visits, 98.7% of teeth treated had survived. Twelve teeth have pre-treatment periapical lesions, and all healed except one. Female patients were found to have higher scores of PAI compared to male patients (23.7% vs 7.5%), yet insignificant. Only 10 patients with nonsurgical root canal treatment reported recurrent caries.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates a high survival rate for nonsurgical endodontic treatment performed under GA in a cohort of patients with SHCNs. Interestingly, patients with social and communication disorders received the highest proportion of treatments under GA. These findings highlight the potential of GA-facilitated endodontics for this population. However, further research is warranted to explore additional methods for optimizing oral health outcomes in SHCNs.</p>","PeriodicalId":36997,"journal":{"name":"BDJ Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11109185/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of nonsurgical endodontic treatment under general anesthesia in special health care needs: An observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Fahd Alsalleeh, Fatima Y Albishry, Asrar S Aleyiydi, Farah S Aldossari, Norah H Alharbi, Maha Alghofaily, Riyadh Althumairy\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41405-024-00224-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>The alarming rise in the number of people with special health care needs (SHCNs) necessitates a paradigm shift in how to approach their oral health needs. General anesthesia (GA) is a valuable technique for facilitating dental procedures in patients with SHCNs who may not be able to tolerate treatment without it. The aim was to assess nonsurgical endodontic treatment and outcomes in patients with SHCNs performed under GA.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Seventy-eight permanent teeth in 33 patients who received nonsurgical endodontic treatment under GA were included between 2018 and 2022 in SHCNs hospital clinics. The demographic data, types of SHCNs, pulpal and periapical diagnosis, type of treatment, and material used were analyzed. All patients were recalled for clinical and radiographic examinations. Pre-treatment and recall periapical radiographs were evaluated and scored using the Periapical Index (PAI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Autism and Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder were 39.4% of patients treated. Most treatments delivered were primary nonsurgical root canal treatment (95%). Warm vertical compaction of gutta-percha for obturation accounted for 88% of cases treated. Single cone obturation technique was used in 9 cases (12%) utilizing tricalcium silicate sealer. At the recall visits, 98.7% of teeth treated had survived. Twelve teeth have pre-treatment periapical lesions, and all healed except one. Female patients were found to have higher scores of PAI compared to male patients (23.7% vs 7.5%), yet insignificant. Only 10 patients with nonsurgical root canal treatment reported recurrent caries.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates a high survival rate for nonsurgical endodontic treatment performed under GA in a cohort of patients with SHCNs. Interestingly, patients with social and communication disorders received the highest proportion of treatments under GA. These findings highlight the potential of GA-facilitated endodontics for this population. However, further research is warranted to explore additional methods for optimizing oral health outcomes in SHCNs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BDJ Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11109185/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BDJ Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-024-00224-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BDJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-024-00224-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:有特殊健康护理需求(SHCNs)的人数急剧上升,这就要求我们转变模式,以满足他们的口腔健康需求。全身麻醉(GA)是为有特殊健康护理需求的患者进行牙科手术提供便利的一项重要技术,如果不进行全身麻醉,这些患者可能无法忍受治疗。该研究旨在评估在 GA 下对 SHCN 患者进行的非手术牙髓治疗及其结果:方法:纳入2018年至2022年期间在SHCNs医院诊所接受GA非手术根管治疗的33名患者的78颗恒牙。分析了人口统计学数据、SHCNs 类型、牙髓和根尖周诊断、治疗类型和所用材料。所有患者都被召回进行临床和放射学检查。使用根尖周指数(PAI)对治疗前和治疗后的根尖周X光片进行评估和评分:结果:接受治疗的患者中,39.4%患有自闭症和注意缺陷多动障碍。大多数治疗都是初级非手术根管治疗(95%)。在治疗的病例中,88%的病例采用了温热垂直压合的根管灌封技术。有 9 个病例(12%)使用硅酸三钙封闭剂进行单锥封闭技术。在回访中,98.7%的治疗过的牙齿都存活了下来。有 12 颗牙齿在治疗前有根尖周病变,除一颗外,其余均已愈合。与男性患者相比,女性患者的 PAI 得分更高(23.7% 对 7.5%),但并不明显。只有 10 名接受非手术根管治疗的患者报告了复发龋:本研究表明,在一组 SHCN 患者中,在 GA 下进行非手术根管治疗的存活率很高。有趣的是,社交和沟通障碍患者接受 GA 治疗的比例最高。这些发现凸显了在 GA 协助下进行牙髓治疗对这一人群的潜力。然而,我们还需要进一步的研究,探索更多的方法来优化 SHCNs 的口腔健康结果。
Outcomes of nonsurgical endodontic treatment under general anesthesia in special health care needs: An observational study.
Background and aim: The alarming rise in the number of people with special health care needs (SHCNs) necessitates a paradigm shift in how to approach their oral health needs. General anesthesia (GA) is a valuable technique for facilitating dental procedures in patients with SHCNs who may not be able to tolerate treatment without it. The aim was to assess nonsurgical endodontic treatment and outcomes in patients with SHCNs performed under GA.
Method: Seventy-eight permanent teeth in 33 patients who received nonsurgical endodontic treatment under GA were included between 2018 and 2022 in SHCNs hospital clinics. The demographic data, types of SHCNs, pulpal and periapical diagnosis, type of treatment, and material used were analyzed. All patients were recalled for clinical and radiographic examinations. Pre-treatment and recall periapical radiographs were evaluated and scored using the Periapical Index (PAI).
Results: Autism and Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder were 39.4% of patients treated. Most treatments delivered were primary nonsurgical root canal treatment (95%). Warm vertical compaction of gutta-percha for obturation accounted for 88% of cases treated. Single cone obturation technique was used in 9 cases (12%) utilizing tricalcium silicate sealer. At the recall visits, 98.7% of teeth treated had survived. Twelve teeth have pre-treatment periapical lesions, and all healed except one. Female patients were found to have higher scores of PAI compared to male patients (23.7% vs 7.5%), yet insignificant. Only 10 patients with nonsurgical root canal treatment reported recurrent caries.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates a high survival rate for nonsurgical endodontic treatment performed under GA in a cohort of patients with SHCNs. Interestingly, patients with social and communication disorders received the highest proportion of treatments under GA. These findings highlight the potential of GA-facilitated endodontics for this population. However, further research is warranted to explore additional methods for optimizing oral health outcomes in SHCNs.