粪便免疫化学检验临界值对腺瘤检出率的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Melissa Zarandi-Nowroozi, Mahsa Taghiakbari, Alan Barkun, Heiko Pohl, Bénédicte Nauche, Miguel Chagnon, Daniel von Renteln
{"title":"粪便免疫化学检验临界值对腺瘤检出率的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Melissa Zarandi-Nowroozi, Mahsa Taghiakbari, Alan Barkun, Heiko Pohl, Bénédicte Nauche, Miguel Chagnon, Daniel von Renteln","doi":"10.1080/00365521.2024.2356649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is higher after a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) compared to direct screening colonoscopy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-analysis evaluated how ADR, the rates of advanced adenoma detection (AADR), colorectal cancer detection (CDR), and sessile serrated lesion detection (SSLDR) are affected by different FIT positivity thresholds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and EBM Reviews databases for studies reporting ADR, AADR, CDR, and SSLDR according to different FIT cut-off values in asymptomatic average-risk individuals aged 50-74 years old. Data were stratified according to sex, age, time to colonoscopy, publication year, continent, and FIT kit type. Study quality, heterogeneity, and publication bias were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 4280 articles were retrieved and fifty-eight studies were included (277,661 FIT-positive colonoscopies; mean cecal intubation 96.3%; mean age 60.8 years; male 52.1%). Mean ADR was 56.1% (95% CI 53.4 - 58.7%), while mean AADR, CDR, and SSLDR were 27.2% (95% CI 24.4 - 30.1%), 5.3% (95% CI 4.7 - 6.0%), and 3.0% (95% CI 1.7 - 4.6%), respectively. For each 20 μg Hb/g increase in FIT cut-off level, ADR increased by 1.54% (95% CI 0.52 - 2.56%, <i>p</i> < 0.01), AADR by 3.90% (95% CI 2.76 - 5.05%, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and CDR by 1.46% (95% CI 0.66 - 2.24%, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Many detection rates were greater amongst males and Europeans.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ADRs in FIT-positive colonoscopies are influenced by the adopted FIT positivity threshold, and identified targets, importantly, proved to be higher than most current societal recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":21461,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"882-892"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of fecal immunochemical test cut-off levels on adenoma detection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa Zarandi-Nowroozi, Mahsa Taghiakbari, Alan Barkun, Heiko Pohl, Bénédicte Nauche, Miguel Chagnon, Daniel von Renteln\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00365521.2024.2356649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is higher after a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) compared to direct screening colonoscopy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-analysis evaluated how ADR, the rates of advanced adenoma detection (AADR), colorectal cancer detection (CDR), and sessile serrated lesion detection (SSLDR) are affected by different FIT positivity thresholds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and EBM Reviews databases for studies reporting ADR, AADR, CDR, and SSLDR according to different FIT cut-off values in asymptomatic average-risk individuals aged 50-74 years old. Data were stratified according to sex, age, time to colonoscopy, publication year, continent, and FIT kit type. Study quality, heterogeneity, and publication bias were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 4280 articles were retrieved and fifty-eight studies were included (277,661 FIT-positive colonoscopies; mean cecal intubation 96.3%; mean age 60.8 years; male 52.1%). Mean ADR was 56.1% (95% CI 53.4 - 58.7%), while mean AADR, CDR, and SSLDR were 27.2% (95% CI 24.4 - 30.1%), 5.3% (95% CI 4.7 - 6.0%), and 3.0% (95% CI 1.7 - 4.6%), respectively. For each 20 μg Hb/g increase in FIT cut-off level, ADR increased by 1.54% (95% CI 0.52 - 2.56%, <i>p</i> < 0.01), AADR by 3.90% (95% CI 2.76 - 5.05%, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and CDR by 1.46% (95% CI 0.66 - 2.24%, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Many detection rates were greater amongst males and Europeans.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ADRs in FIT-positive colonoscopies are influenced by the adopted FIT positivity threshold, and identified targets, importantly, proved to be higher than most current societal recommendations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"882-892\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2024.2356649\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2024.2356649","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与直接筛查结肠镜相比,粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)阳性后的腺瘤检出率(ADR)更高:这项荟萃分析评估了不同的 FIT 阳性阈值对 ADR、晚期腺瘤检出率 (AADR)、结直肠癌检出率 (CDR) 和无柄锯齿状病变检出率 (SSLDR) 的影响:我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 EBM Reviews 数据库,以查找根据不同 FIT 临界值对 50-74 岁无症状高危人群进行 ADR、AADR、CDR 和 SSLDR 检测的研究。根据性别、年龄、结肠镜检查时间、发表年份、大陆和 FIT 套件类型对数据进行了分层。对研究质量、异质性和发表偏倚进行了评估:共检索到 4280 篇文章,纳入了 58 项研究(277661 例 FIT 阳性结肠镜检查;平均盲肠插管率 96.3%;平均年龄 60.8 岁;男性 52.1%)。平均 ADR 为 56.1%(95% CI 53.4 - 58.7%),平均 AADR、CDR 和 SSLDR 分别为 27.2%(95% CI 24.4 - 30.1%)、5.3%(95% CI 4.7 - 6.0%)和 3.0%(95% CI 1.7 - 4.6%)。FIT 临界值每增加 20 μg Hb/g,ADR 增加 1.54%(95% CI 0.52 - 2.56%,p p p 结论:FIT 阳性结肠镜检查中的 ADR 受所采用的 FIT 阳性临界值的影响,重要的是,已确定的目标值高于目前大多数社会建议值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of fecal immunochemical test cut-off levels on adenoma detection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is higher after a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) compared to direct screening colonoscopy.

Objective: This meta-analysis evaluated how ADR, the rates of advanced adenoma detection (AADR), colorectal cancer detection (CDR), and sessile serrated lesion detection (SSLDR) are affected by different FIT positivity thresholds.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and EBM Reviews databases for studies reporting ADR, AADR, CDR, and SSLDR according to different FIT cut-off values in asymptomatic average-risk individuals aged 50-74 years old. Data were stratified according to sex, age, time to colonoscopy, publication year, continent, and FIT kit type. Study quality, heterogeneity, and publication bias were assessed.

Results: Overall, 4280 articles were retrieved and fifty-eight studies were included (277,661 FIT-positive colonoscopies; mean cecal intubation 96.3%; mean age 60.8 years; male 52.1%). Mean ADR was 56.1% (95% CI 53.4 - 58.7%), while mean AADR, CDR, and SSLDR were 27.2% (95% CI 24.4 - 30.1%), 5.3% (95% CI 4.7 - 6.0%), and 3.0% (95% CI 1.7 - 4.6%), respectively. For each 20 μg Hb/g increase in FIT cut-off level, ADR increased by 1.54% (95% CI 0.52 - 2.56%, p < 0.01), AADR by 3.90% (95% CI 2.76 - 5.05%, p < 0.01) and CDR by 1.46% (95% CI 0.66 - 2.24%, p < 0.01). Many detection rates were greater amongst males and Europeans.

Conclusions: ADRs in FIT-positive colonoscopies are influenced by the adopted FIT positivity threshold, and identified targets, importantly, proved to be higher than most current societal recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology is one of the most important journals for international medical research in gastroenterology and hepatology with international contributors, Editorial Board, and distribution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信