日本老年肺结核患者服用吡嗪酰胺的安全性:全国性队列研究。

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Respirology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1111/resp.14753
Jumpei Taniguchi, Taisuke Jo, Shotaro Aso, Hiroki Matsui, Kiyohide Fushimi, Hideo Yasunaga
{"title":"日本老年肺结核患者服用吡嗪酰胺的安全性:全国性队列研究。","authors":"Jumpei Taniguchi, Taisuke Jo, Shotaro Aso, Hiroki Matsui, Kiyohide Fushimi, Hideo Yasunaga","doi":"10.1111/resp.14753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Pyrazinamide (PZA) is the standard first-line treatment for tuberculosis (TB); however, its safety in elderly patients has not been thoroughly investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study used data from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database. We identified patients who were admitted for TB between July 2010 and March 2022. Patients were categorized into HRE (isoniazid, rifampicin and ethambutol) and HREZ (isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol and PZA) groups. Primary outcomes included in-hospital mortality and overall adverse events (characterized by a composite of hepatotoxicity, gout attack, allergic reactions and gastrointestinal intolerance). Secondary outcomes included the length of hospital stay, 90-day readmission and use of drugs related to the primary outcome adverse events. Data were analysed using propensity score matching; we also conducted a subgroup analysis for those aged ≥75 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 19,930 eligible patients, 8924 received HRE and 11,006 received HREZ. Propensity score matching created 3578 matched pairs with a mean age of approximately 80 years. Compared with the HRE group, the HREZ group demonstrated a higher proportion of overall adverse events (3.1% vs. 4.7%; p < 0.001), allergic reactions (1.4% vs. 2.5%; p < 0.001) and antihistamine use (21.9% vs. 27.6%; p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed regarding in-hospital mortality, hepatotoxicity or length of hospital stay between the groups. Subgroup analysis for those aged ≥75 years showed consistent results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Medical practitioners may consider adding PZA to an initial treatment regimen even in elderly patients with TB.</p>","PeriodicalId":21129,"journal":{"name":"Respirology","volume":" ","pages":"905-913"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of pyrazinamide in elderly patients with tuberculosis in Japan: A nationwide cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Jumpei Taniguchi, Taisuke Jo, Shotaro Aso, Hiroki Matsui, Kiyohide Fushimi, Hideo Yasunaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/resp.14753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Pyrazinamide (PZA) is the standard first-line treatment for tuberculosis (TB); however, its safety in elderly patients has not been thoroughly investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study used data from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database. We identified patients who were admitted for TB between July 2010 and March 2022. Patients were categorized into HRE (isoniazid, rifampicin and ethambutol) and HREZ (isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol and PZA) groups. Primary outcomes included in-hospital mortality and overall adverse events (characterized by a composite of hepatotoxicity, gout attack, allergic reactions and gastrointestinal intolerance). Secondary outcomes included the length of hospital stay, 90-day readmission and use of drugs related to the primary outcome adverse events. Data were analysed using propensity score matching; we also conducted a subgroup analysis for those aged ≥75 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 19,930 eligible patients, 8924 received HRE and 11,006 received HREZ. Propensity score matching created 3578 matched pairs with a mean age of approximately 80 years. Compared with the HRE group, the HREZ group demonstrated a higher proportion of overall adverse events (3.1% vs. 4.7%; p < 0.001), allergic reactions (1.4% vs. 2.5%; p < 0.001) and antihistamine use (21.9% vs. 27.6%; p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed regarding in-hospital mortality, hepatotoxicity or length of hospital stay between the groups. Subgroup analysis for those aged ≥75 years showed consistent results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Medical practitioners may consider adding PZA to an initial treatment regimen even in elderly patients with TB.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respirology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"905-913\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respirology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.14753\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respirology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.14753","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:吡嗪酰胺(PZA)是治疗肺结核(TB)的标准一线疗法,但其对老年患者的安全性尚未得到深入研究:这项回顾性研究使用了日本诊断程序组合住院患者数据库中的数据。我们确定了 2010 年 7 月至 2022 年 3 月期间因肺结核入院的患者。患者被分为HRE(异烟肼、利福平和乙胺丁醇)组和HREZ(异烟肼、利福平、乙胺丁醇和PZA)组。主要结果包括院内死亡率和总体不良事件(由肝毒性、痛风发作、过敏反应和胃肠道不耐受复合而成)。次要结果包括住院时间、90 天再入院率以及与主要结果不良事件相关的药物使用情况。我们采用倾向得分匹配法对数据进行了分析;我们还对年龄≥75岁的患者进行了亚组分析:在符合条件的 19930 名患者中,8924 人接受了 HRE 治疗,11006 人接受了 HREZ 治疗。倾向评分匹配产生了 3578 对匹配对,平均年龄约为 80 岁。与 HRE 组相比,HREZ 组发生总体不良事件的比例较高(3.1% 对 4.7%;P 结论:PZA 的不良事件发生率低于 HRE 组:即使是老年肺结核患者,医生也可以考虑在初始治疗方案中加入 PZA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety of pyrazinamide in elderly patients with tuberculosis in Japan: A nationwide cohort study.

Background and objective: Pyrazinamide (PZA) is the standard first-line treatment for tuberculosis (TB); however, its safety in elderly patients has not been thoroughly investigated.

Methods: This retrospective study used data from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database. We identified patients who were admitted for TB between July 2010 and March 2022. Patients were categorized into HRE (isoniazid, rifampicin and ethambutol) and HREZ (isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol and PZA) groups. Primary outcomes included in-hospital mortality and overall adverse events (characterized by a composite of hepatotoxicity, gout attack, allergic reactions and gastrointestinal intolerance). Secondary outcomes included the length of hospital stay, 90-day readmission and use of drugs related to the primary outcome adverse events. Data were analysed using propensity score matching; we also conducted a subgroup analysis for those aged ≥75 years.

Results: Among 19,930 eligible patients, 8924 received HRE and 11,006 received HREZ. Propensity score matching created 3578 matched pairs with a mean age of approximately 80 years. Compared with the HRE group, the HREZ group demonstrated a higher proportion of overall adverse events (3.1% vs. 4.7%; p < 0.001), allergic reactions (1.4% vs. 2.5%; p < 0.001) and antihistamine use (21.9% vs. 27.6%; p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed regarding in-hospital mortality, hepatotoxicity or length of hospital stay between the groups. Subgroup analysis for those aged ≥75 years showed consistent results.

Conclusion: Medical practitioners may consider adding PZA to an initial treatment regimen even in elderly patients with TB.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respirology
Respirology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
5.80%
发文量
225
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Respirology is a journal of international standing, publishing peer-reviewed articles of scientific excellence in clinical and clinically-relevant experimental respiratory biology and disease. Fields of research include immunology, intensive and critical care, epidemiology, cell and molecular biology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, paediatric respiratory medicine, clinical trials, interventional pulmonology and thoracic surgery. The Journal aims to encourage the international exchange of results and publishes papers in the following categories: Original Articles, Editorials, Reviews, and Correspondences. Respirology is the preferred journal of the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand, has been adopted as the preferred English journal of the Japanese Respiratory Society and the Taiwan Society of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and is an official journal of the World Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信