Shani T Gal-Oz, Alev Baysoy, Brinda Vijaykumar, Sara Mostafavi, Christophe Benoist, Tal Shay
{"title":"I 型 IFN 动力学和性别特异性反应的微异质性","authors":"Shani T Gal-Oz, Alev Baysoy, Brinda Vijaykumar, Sara Mostafavi, Christophe Benoist, Tal Shay","doi":"10.4049/jimmunol.2300453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The response to type I IFNs involves the rapid induction of prototypical IFN signature genes (ISGs). It is not known whether the tightly controlled ISG expression observed at the cell population level correctly represents the coherent responses of individual cells or whether it masks some heterogeneity in gene modules and/or responding cells. We performed a time-resolved single-cell analysis of the first 3 h after in vivo IFN stimulation in macrophages and CD4+ T and B lymphocytes from mice. All ISGs were generally induced in concert, with no clear cluster of faster- or slower-responding ISGs. Response kinetics differed between cell types: mostly homogeneous for macrophages, but with far more kinetic diversity among B and T lymphocytes, which included a distinct subset of nonresponsive cells. Velocity analysis confirmed the differences between macrophages in which the response progressed throughout the full 3 h, versus B and T lymphocytes in which it was rapidly curtailed by negative feedback and revealed differences in transcription rates between the lineages. In all cell types, female cells responded faster than their male counterparts. The ISG response thus seems to proceed as a homogeneous gene block, but with kinetics that vary between immune cell types and with sex differences that might underlie differential outcomes of viral infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":16045,"journal":{"name":"Journal of immunology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11328978/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microheterogeneity in the Kinetics and Sex-Specific Response to Type I IFN.\",\"authors\":\"Shani T Gal-Oz, Alev Baysoy, Brinda Vijaykumar, Sara Mostafavi, Christophe Benoist, Tal Shay\",\"doi\":\"10.4049/jimmunol.2300453\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The response to type I IFNs involves the rapid induction of prototypical IFN signature genes (ISGs). It is not known whether the tightly controlled ISG expression observed at the cell population level correctly represents the coherent responses of individual cells or whether it masks some heterogeneity in gene modules and/or responding cells. We performed a time-resolved single-cell analysis of the first 3 h after in vivo IFN stimulation in macrophages and CD4+ T and B lymphocytes from mice. All ISGs were generally induced in concert, with no clear cluster of faster- or slower-responding ISGs. Response kinetics differed between cell types: mostly homogeneous for macrophages, but with far more kinetic diversity among B and T lymphocytes, which included a distinct subset of nonresponsive cells. Velocity analysis confirmed the differences between macrophages in which the response progressed throughout the full 3 h, versus B and T lymphocytes in which it was rapidly curtailed by negative feedback and revealed differences in transcription rates between the lineages. In all cell types, female cells responded faster than their male counterparts. The ISG response thus seems to proceed as a homogeneous gene block, but with kinetics that vary between immune cell types and with sex differences that might underlie differential outcomes of viral infections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of immunology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11328978/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.2300453\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.2300453","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
对 I 型 IFNs 的反应包括快速诱导原型 IFN 特征基因(ISGs)。目前还不清楚在细胞群水平观察到的严格控制的 ISG 表达是否正确地代表了单个细胞的一致反应,或者是否掩盖了基因模块和/或反应细胞中的某些异质性。我们对小鼠的巨噬细胞、CD4+ T 淋巴细胞和 B 淋巴细胞受到体内 IFN 刺激后的前 3 小时进行了时间分辨单细胞分析。所有 ISG 一般都是协同诱导的,没有明显的反应较快或较慢的 ISG 群。不同类型细胞的反应动力学各不相同:巨噬细胞的反应动力学基本相同,但 B 淋巴细胞和 T 淋巴细胞的反应动力学多样性要大得多,其中包括一个独特的无反应细胞子集。速度分析证实了巨噬细胞与 B 和 T 淋巴细胞之间的差异,巨噬细胞的反应在整个 3 小时内持续进行,而 B 和 T 淋巴细胞的反应则因负反馈而迅速减弱。在所有细胞类型中,雌性细胞的反应速度都快于雄性细胞。因此,ISG 反应似乎是作为同质基因块进行的,但其动力学因免疫细胞类型和性别差异而异,这可能是病毒感染结果不同的原因。
Microheterogeneity in the Kinetics and Sex-Specific Response to Type I IFN.
The response to type I IFNs involves the rapid induction of prototypical IFN signature genes (ISGs). It is not known whether the tightly controlled ISG expression observed at the cell population level correctly represents the coherent responses of individual cells or whether it masks some heterogeneity in gene modules and/or responding cells. We performed a time-resolved single-cell analysis of the first 3 h after in vivo IFN stimulation in macrophages and CD4+ T and B lymphocytes from mice. All ISGs were generally induced in concert, with no clear cluster of faster- or slower-responding ISGs. Response kinetics differed between cell types: mostly homogeneous for macrophages, but with far more kinetic diversity among B and T lymphocytes, which included a distinct subset of nonresponsive cells. Velocity analysis confirmed the differences between macrophages in which the response progressed throughout the full 3 h, versus B and T lymphocytes in which it was rapidly curtailed by negative feedback and revealed differences in transcription rates between the lineages. In all cell types, female cells responded faster than their male counterparts. The ISG response thus seems to proceed as a homogeneous gene block, but with kinetics that vary between immune cell types and with sex differences that might underlie differential outcomes of viral infections.
期刊介绍:
The JI publishes novel, peer-reviewed findings in all areas of experimental immunology, including innate and adaptive immunity, inflammation, host defense, clinical immunology, autoimmunity and more. Special sections include Cutting Edge articles, Brief Reviews and Pillars of Immunology. The JI is published by The American Association of Immunologists (AAI)