宗教两极分化以及对隐形科学实体和宗教实体的信仰理由。

IF 3.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Ayse Payir, Gaye Soley, Oya Serbest, Kathleen H. Corriveau, Paul L. Harris
{"title":"宗教两极分化以及对隐形科学实体和宗教实体的信仰理由。","authors":"Ayse Payir,&nbsp;Gaye Soley,&nbsp;Oya Serbest,&nbsp;Kathleen H. Corriveau,&nbsp;Paul L. Harris","doi":"10.1111/cdev.14118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Children and adults express greater confidence in the existence of invisible scientific as compared to invisible religious entities. To further examine this differential confidence, 5- to 11-year-old Turkish children and their parents (<i>N</i> = 174, 122 females) from various regions in Türkiye, a country with an ongoing tension between secularism and religion, were tested in 2021 for their belief in invisible entities. Participants expressed more confidence in the existence of scientific than religious entities. For scientific entities, children justified their belief primarily by elaborating on the properties of the entity, rather than referring to the testimonial source of their judgment. This pattern was reversed for religious entities, arguably, highlighting the role of polarization in shaping the testimony children typically hear.</p>","PeriodicalId":10109,"journal":{"name":"Child development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Religious polarization and justification of belief in invisible scientific versus religious entities\",\"authors\":\"Ayse Payir,&nbsp;Gaye Soley,&nbsp;Oya Serbest,&nbsp;Kathleen H. Corriveau,&nbsp;Paul L. Harris\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cdev.14118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Children and adults express greater confidence in the existence of invisible scientific as compared to invisible religious entities. To further examine this differential confidence, 5- to 11-year-old Turkish children and their parents (<i>N</i> = 174, 122 females) from various regions in Türkiye, a country with an ongoing tension between secularism and religion, were tested in 2021 for their belief in invisible entities. Participants expressed more confidence in the existence of scientific than religious entities. For scientific entities, children justified their belief primarily by elaborating on the properties of the entity, rather than referring to the testimonial source of their judgment. This pattern was reversed for religious entities, arguably, highlighting the role of polarization in shaping the testimony children typically hear.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cdev.14118\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cdev.14118","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与看不见的宗教实体相比,儿童和成人对看不见的科学实体的存在更有信心。为了进一步研究这种信心差异,我们在 2021 年对来自土耳其不同地区的 5 至 11 岁儿童及其父母(174 人,122 名女性)进行了隐形实体信仰测试。与宗教实体相比,参与者对科学实体的存在更有信心。对于科学实体,孩子们主要通过阐述实体的属性来证明他们的信仰,而不是提及他们判断的证据来源。可以说,这种模式在宗教实体方面正好相反,它突出了两极分化在塑造儿童通常听到的证词方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Religious polarization and justification of belief in invisible scientific versus religious entities

Children and adults express greater confidence in the existence of invisible scientific as compared to invisible religious entities. To further examine this differential confidence, 5- to 11-year-old Turkish children and their parents (N = 174, 122 females) from various regions in Türkiye, a country with an ongoing tension between secularism and religion, were tested in 2021 for their belief in invisible entities. Participants expressed more confidence in the existence of scientific than religious entities. For scientific entities, children justified their belief primarily by elaborating on the properties of the entity, rather than referring to the testimonial source of their judgment. This pattern was reversed for religious entities, arguably, highlighting the role of polarization in shaping the testimony children typically hear.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Child development
Child development Multiple-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
149
期刊介绍: As the flagship journal of the Society for Research in Child Development (SRCD), Child Development has published articles, essays, reviews, and tutorials on various topics in the field of child development since 1930. Spanning many disciplines, the journal provides the latest research, not only for researchers and theoreticians, but also for child psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, psychiatric social workers, specialists in early childhood education, educational psychologists, special education teachers, and other researchers. In addition to six issues per year of Child Development, subscribers to the journal also receive a full subscription to Child Development Perspectives and Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信