Jonathan P Rogers, Gabriella Lewis, Maria Lobo, Clementine Wyke, Alexander Meaburn, Fiona Harding, Rebecca Garvey, Jenny Irvine, Ahmed Saeed Yahya, Daisy Kornblum, Alexis E Cullen, David Mirfin, Glyn Lewis
{"title":"确定精神科重症监护病房终止隔离后不良后果的预测因素。","authors":"Jonathan P Rogers, Gabriella Lewis, Maria Lobo, Clementine Wyke, Alexander Meaburn, Fiona Harding, Rebecca Garvey, Jenny Irvine, Ahmed Saeed Yahya, Daisy Kornblum, Alexis E Cullen, David Mirfin, Glyn Lewis","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2024.710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Seclusion is a restrictive practice that many healthcare services are trying to reduce. Previous studies have sought to identify predictors of seclusion initiation, but few have investigated factors associated with adverse outcomes after seclusion termination.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the factors that predict an adverse outcome within 24 h of seclusion termination.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In a cohort study of individuals secluded in psychiatric intensive care units, we investigated factors associated with any of the following outcomes: actual violence, attempted violence, or reinitiation of seclusion within 24 h of seclusion termination. Among the seclusion episodes that were initiated between 29 March 2018 and 4 March 2019, we investigated the exposures of medication cooperation, seclusion duration, termination out of working hours, involvement of medical staff in the final seclusion review, lack of insight, and agitation or irritability. In a mixed-effects logistic regression model, associations between each exposure and the outcome were calculated. Odds ratios were calculated unadjusted and adjusted for demographic and clinical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 254 seclusion episodes from 122 individuals (40 female, 82 male), of which 106 (41.7%) had an adverse outcome within 24 h of seclusion termination. Agitation or irritability was associated with an adverse outcome, odds ratio 1.92 (95% CI 1.03 to 3.56, <i>P</i> = 0.04), but there was no statistically significant association with any of the other exposures, although confidence intervals were broad.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Agitation or irritability in the hours preceding termination of seclusion may predict an adverse outcome. The study was not powered to detect other potentially clinically significant factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"10 3","pages":"e120"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363086/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying predictors of adverse outcomes after termination of seclusion in psychiatric intensive care units.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan P Rogers, Gabriella Lewis, Maria Lobo, Clementine Wyke, Alexander Meaburn, Fiona Harding, Rebecca Garvey, Jenny Irvine, Ahmed Saeed Yahya, Daisy Kornblum, Alexis E Cullen, David Mirfin, Glyn Lewis\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/bjo.2024.710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Seclusion is a restrictive practice that many healthcare services are trying to reduce. Previous studies have sought to identify predictors of seclusion initiation, but few have investigated factors associated with adverse outcomes after seclusion termination.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the factors that predict an adverse outcome within 24 h of seclusion termination.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In a cohort study of individuals secluded in psychiatric intensive care units, we investigated factors associated with any of the following outcomes: actual violence, attempted violence, or reinitiation of seclusion within 24 h of seclusion termination. Among the seclusion episodes that were initiated between 29 March 2018 and 4 March 2019, we investigated the exposures of medication cooperation, seclusion duration, termination out of working hours, involvement of medical staff in the final seclusion review, lack of insight, and agitation or irritability. In a mixed-effects logistic regression model, associations between each exposure and the outcome were calculated. Odds ratios were calculated unadjusted and adjusted for demographic and clinical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 254 seclusion episodes from 122 individuals (40 female, 82 male), of which 106 (41.7%) had an adverse outcome within 24 h of seclusion termination. Agitation or irritability was associated with an adverse outcome, odds ratio 1.92 (95% CI 1.03 to 3.56, <i>P</i> = 0.04), but there was no statistically significant association with any of the other exposures, although confidence intervals were broad.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Agitation or irritability in the hours preceding termination of seclusion may predict an adverse outcome. The study was not powered to detect other potentially clinically significant factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJPsych Open\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"e120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363086/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJPsych Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.710\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.710","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Identifying predictors of adverse outcomes after termination of seclusion in psychiatric intensive care units.
Background: Seclusion is a restrictive practice that many healthcare services are trying to reduce. Previous studies have sought to identify predictors of seclusion initiation, but few have investigated factors associated with adverse outcomes after seclusion termination.
Aims: To assess the factors that predict an adverse outcome within 24 h of seclusion termination.
Method: In a cohort study of individuals secluded in psychiatric intensive care units, we investigated factors associated with any of the following outcomes: actual violence, attempted violence, or reinitiation of seclusion within 24 h of seclusion termination. Among the seclusion episodes that were initiated between 29 March 2018 and 4 March 2019, we investigated the exposures of medication cooperation, seclusion duration, termination out of working hours, involvement of medical staff in the final seclusion review, lack of insight, and agitation or irritability. In a mixed-effects logistic regression model, associations between each exposure and the outcome were calculated. Odds ratios were calculated unadjusted and adjusted for demographic and clinical variables.
Results: We identified 254 seclusion episodes from 122 individuals (40 female, 82 male), of which 106 (41.7%) had an adverse outcome within 24 h of seclusion termination. Agitation or irritability was associated with an adverse outcome, odds ratio 1.92 (95% CI 1.03 to 3.56, P = 0.04), but there was no statistically significant association with any of the other exposures, although confidence intervals were broad.
Conclusions: Agitation or irritability in the hours preceding termination of seclusion may predict an adverse outcome. The study was not powered to detect other potentially clinically significant factors.
期刊介绍:
Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.