{"title":"白光计算机辅助光学诊断常规临床实践中的微小结直肠息肉。","authors":"Emanuele Rondonotti, Irene Maria Bambina Bergna, Silvia Paggi, Arnaldo Amato, Alida Andrealli, Giulia Scardino, Giacomo Tamanini, Nicoletta Lenoci, Giovanna Mandelli, Natalia Terreni, SImone Rocchetto, Alessandra Piagnani, Dhanai Di Paolo, Niccolò Bina, Emanuela Filippi, Luciana Ambrosiani, Cesare Hassan, Loredana Correale, Franco Radaelli","doi":"10.1055/a-2303-0922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems could make the optical diagnosis (OD) of diminutive colorectal polyps (DCPs) more reliable and objective. This study was aimed at prospectively evaluating feasibility and diagnostic performance of AI-standalone and AI-assisted OD of DCPs in a real-life setting by using a white light-based system (GI Genius, Medtronic Co, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States). <b>Patients and methods</b> Consecutive colonoscopy outpatients with at least one DCP were evaluated by 11 endoscopists (5 experts and 6 non-experts in OD). DCPs were classified in real time by AI (AI-standalone OD) and by the endoscopist with the assistance of AI (AI-assisted OD), with histopathology as the reference standard. <b>Results</b> Of the 480 DCPs, AI provided the outcome \"adenoma\" or \"non-adenoma\" in 81.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 77.5-84.6). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy of AI-standalone OD were 97.0% (95% CI 94.0-98.6), 38.1% (95% CI 28.9-48.1), 80.1% (95% CI 75.2-84.2), 83.3% (95% CI 69.2-92.0), and 80.5% (95% CI 68.7-82.8%), respectively. Compared with AI-standalone, the specificity of AI-assisted OD was significantly higher (58.9%, 95% CI 49.7-67.5) and a trend toward an increase was observed for other diagnostic performance measures. Overall accuracy and negative predictive value of AI-assisted OD for experts and non-experts were 85.8% (95% CI 80.0-90.4) vs. 80.1% (95% CI 73.6-85.6) and 89.1% (95% CI 75.6-95.9) vs. 80.0% (95% CI 63.9-90.4), respectively. <b>Conclusions</b> Standalone AI is able to provide an OD of adenoma/non-adenoma in more than 80% of DCPs, with a high sensitivity but low specificity. The human-machine interaction improved diagnostic performance, especially when experts were involved.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 5","pages":"E676-E683"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11108657/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"White light computer-aided optical diagnosis of diminutive colorectal polyps in routine clinical practice.\",\"authors\":\"Emanuele Rondonotti, Irene Maria Bambina Bergna, Silvia Paggi, Arnaldo Amato, Alida Andrealli, Giulia Scardino, Giacomo Tamanini, Nicoletta Lenoci, Giovanna Mandelli, Natalia Terreni, SImone Rocchetto, Alessandra Piagnani, Dhanai Di Paolo, Niccolò Bina, Emanuela Filippi, Luciana Ambrosiani, Cesare Hassan, Loredana Correale, Franco Radaelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2303-0922\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems could make the optical diagnosis (OD) of diminutive colorectal polyps (DCPs) more reliable and objective. This study was aimed at prospectively evaluating feasibility and diagnostic performance of AI-standalone and AI-assisted OD of DCPs in a real-life setting by using a white light-based system (GI Genius, Medtronic Co, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States). <b>Patients and methods</b> Consecutive colonoscopy outpatients with at least one DCP were evaluated by 11 endoscopists (5 experts and 6 non-experts in OD). DCPs were classified in real time by AI (AI-standalone OD) and by the endoscopist with the assistance of AI (AI-assisted OD), with histopathology as the reference standard. <b>Results</b> Of the 480 DCPs, AI provided the outcome \\\"adenoma\\\" or \\\"non-adenoma\\\" in 81.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 77.5-84.6). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy of AI-standalone OD were 97.0% (95% CI 94.0-98.6), 38.1% (95% CI 28.9-48.1), 80.1% (95% CI 75.2-84.2), 83.3% (95% CI 69.2-92.0), and 80.5% (95% CI 68.7-82.8%), respectively. Compared with AI-standalone, the specificity of AI-assisted OD was significantly higher (58.9%, 95% CI 49.7-67.5) and a trend toward an increase was observed for other diagnostic performance measures. Overall accuracy and negative predictive value of AI-assisted OD for experts and non-experts were 85.8% (95% CI 80.0-90.4) vs. 80.1% (95% CI 73.6-85.6) and 89.1% (95% CI 75.6-95.9) vs. 80.0% (95% CI 63.9-90.4), respectively. <b>Conclusions</b> Standalone AI is able to provide an OD of adenoma/non-adenoma in more than 80% of DCPs, with a high sensitivity but low specificity. The human-machine interaction improved diagnostic performance, especially when experts were involved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"volume\":\"12 5\",\"pages\":\"E676-E683\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11108657/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2303-0922\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2303-0922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和研究目的 人工智能(AI)系统可使微小结直肠息肉(DCP)的光学诊断(OD)更加可靠和客观。本研究旨在通过使用基于白光的系统(GI Genius,美敦力公司,美国明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯市),前瞻性地评估人工智能独立和人工智能辅助 OD 的可行性和诊断性能。患者和方法 11 位内镜医师(5 位 OD 专家和 6 位非专家)对至少有一个 DCP 的连续结肠镜门诊患者进行了评估。DCP 由人工智能实时分类(人工智能独立 OD)和由内镜医师在人工智能协助下分类(人工智能辅助 OD),并以组织病理学作为参考标准。结果 在 480 个 DCP 中,81.4%(95% 置信区间 [CI]:77.5-84.6)的内窥镜检查结果为 "腺瘤 "或 "非腺瘤"。AI-standalone OD 的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及准确性分别为 97.0% (95% CI 94.0-98.6)、38.1% (95% CI 28.9-48.1)、80.1% (95% CI 75.2-84.2) 、83.3% (95% CI 69.2-92.0) 和 80.5% (95% CI 68.7-82.8%)。与单用人工智能相比,人工智能辅助 OD 的特异性明显更高(58.9%,95% CI 49.7-67.5),其他诊断性能指标也呈上升趋势。专家和非专家人工智能辅助 OD 的总体准确率和阴性预测值分别为 85.8%(95% CI 80.0-90.4)vs 80.1%(95% CI 73.6-85.6)和 89.1%(95% CI 75.6-95.9)vs 80.0%(95% CI 63.9-90.4)。结论 独立的人工智能能够为 80% 以上的 DCP 提供腺瘤/非腺瘤的 OD,灵敏度高,但特异性低。人机交互提高了诊断性能,尤其是在有专家参与的情况下。
White light computer-aided optical diagnosis of diminutive colorectal polyps in routine clinical practice.
Background and study aims Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems could make the optical diagnosis (OD) of diminutive colorectal polyps (DCPs) more reliable and objective. This study was aimed at prospectively evaluating feasibility and diagnostic performance of AI-standalone and AI-assisted OD of DCPs in a real-life setting by using a white light-based system (GI Genius, Medtronic Co, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States). Patients and methods Consecutive colonoscopy outpatients with at least one DCP were evaluated by 11 endoscopists (5 experts and 6 non-experts in OD). DCPs were classified in real time by AI (AI-standalone OD) and by the endoscopist with the assistance of AI (AI-assisted OD), with histopathology as the reference standard. Results Of the 480 DCPs, AI provided the outcome "adenoma" or "non-adenoma" in 81.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 77.5-84.6). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy of AI-standalone OD were 97.0% (95% CI 94.0-98.6), 38.1% (95% CI 28.9-48.1), 80.1% (95% CI 75.2-84.2), 83.3% (95% CI 69.2-92.0), and 80.5% (95% CI 68.7-82.8%), respectively. Compared with AI-standalone, the specificity of AI-assisted OD was significantly higher (58.9%, 95% CI 49.7-67.5) and a trend toward an increase was observed for other diagnostic performance measures. Overall accuracy and negative predictive value of AI-assisted OD for experts and non-experts were 85.8% (95% CI 80.0-90.4) vs. 80.1% (95% CI 73.6-85.6) and 89.1% (95% CI 75.6-95.9) vs. 80.0% (95% CI 63.9-90.4), respectively. Conclusions Standalone AI is able to provide an OD of adenoma/non-adenoma in more than 80% of DCPs, with a high sensitivity but low specificity. The human-machine interaction improved diagnostic performance, especially when experts were involved.