用[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC 和[18F]FDG PET/CT 评估神经内分泌肿瘤的分子异质性

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Z. Nogareda Seoane , M.C. Mallón Araújo , A. Calatayud Cubes , C. Barberán Corral , Y. Domínguez Novoa , A. Cousillas Castiñeira , N. Martínez Lago , J.M. de Matías Leralta , V. Pubul Nuñez
{"title":"用[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC 和[18F]FDG PET/CT 评估神经内分泌肿瘤的分子异质性","authors":"Z. Nogareda Seoane ,&nbsp;M.C. Mallón Araújo ,&nbsp;A. Calatayud Cubes ,&nbsp;C. Barberán Corral ,&nbsp;Y. Domínguez Novoa ,&nbsp;A. Cousillas Castiñeira ,&nbsp;N. Martínez Lago ,&nbsp;J.M. de Matías Leralta ,&nbsp;V. Pubul Nuñez","doi":"10.1016/j.remn.2024.500011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of the study was evaluate the diagnostic performance of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT in patients with histologically proven neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), as well as the correlation of the visualized findings with the tumor grade.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>We included 50 patients with NETs who underwent both [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/TC. The pooled sensitivity of both scans was compared, as well as [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG for each tumor grade (grade<!--> <!-->1 [G1], grade<!--> <!-->2 [G2] and grade<!--> <!-->3 [G3]). Also, the sensitivity of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG as a function of the continuous variable Ki-67 was investigated. Finally, the number of lesions detected by both PET radiopharmaceuticals for each tumor grade was compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The pooled sensitivity of both PET/CT (96%) was higher than [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC (84%) and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG (44%) separately, with statistically significant differences. The sensitivity of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC was higher than [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG in both G1 (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.004) and G2 (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.001). In G3 the performance of both scans detected disease in 100% of this subgroup. The sensitivity of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT correlated significantly with the Ki-67 proliferative index. In G2 patients the number of lesions detected with [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC was higher than [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The performance of both PET/CT, particularly in G2 and G3, demonstrates the molecular heterogeneity of metastatic NETs and contributes to the selection of a more appropriate treatment, particularly in those high-grade patients who may benefit from radionuclide therapy (PRRT).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48986,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola De Medicina Nuclear E Imagen Molecular","volume":"43 3","pages":"Article 500011"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluación de la heterogeneidad molecular en tumores neuroendocrinos mediante PET/TC con [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC y [18F]FDG\",\"authors\":\"Z. Nogareda Seoane ,&nbsp;M.C. Mallón Araújo ,&nbsp;A. Calatayud Cubes ,&nbsp;C. Barberán Corral ,&nbsp;Y. Domínguez Novoa ,&nbsp;A. Cousillas Castiñeira ,&nbsp;N. Martínez Lago ,&nbsp;J.M. de Matías Leralta ,&nbsp;V. Pubul Nuñez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.remn.2024.500011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of the study was evaluate the diagnostic performance of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT in patients with histologically proven neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), as well as the correlation of the visualized findings with the tumor grade.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>We included 50 patients with NETs who underwent both [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/TC. The pooled sensitivity of both scans was compared, as well as [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG for each tumor grade (grade<!--> <!-->1 [G1], grade<!--> <!-->2 [G2] and grade<!--> <!-->3 [G3]). Also, the sensitivity of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG as a function of the continuous variable Ki-67 was investigated. Finally, the number of lesions detected by both PET radiopharmaceuticals for each tumor grade was compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The pooled sensitivity of both PET/CT (96%) was higher than [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC (84%) and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG (44%) separately, with statistically significant differences. The sensitivity of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC was higher than [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG in both G1 (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.004) and G2 (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.001). In G3 the performance of both scans detected disease in 100% of this subgroup. The sensitivity of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT correlated significantly with the Ki-67 proliferative index. In G2 patients the number of lesions detected with [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC was higher than [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The performance of both PET/CT, particularly in G2 and G3, demonstrates the molecular heterogeneity of metastatic NETs and contributes to the selection of a more appropriate treatment, particularly in those high-grade patients who may benefit from radionuclide therapy (PRRT).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola De Medicina Nuclear E Imagen Molecular\",\"volume\":\"43 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 500011\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola De Medicina Nuclear E Imagen Molecular\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2253654X24000180\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola De Medicina Nuclear E Imagen Molecular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2253654X24000180","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究旨在评估[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC和[18F]FDG PET/CT在组织学证实的神经内分泌肿瘤(NET)患者中的诊断性能,以及显像结果与肿瘤分级的相关性。比较了两种扫描的集合灵敏度,以及[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC和[18F]FDG对各肿瘤分级(1级[G1]、2级[G2]和3级[G3])的灵敏度。此外,还研究了[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC和[18F]FDG的灵敏度与连续变量Ki-67的函数关系。结果 两种 PET/CT 的综合灵敏度(96%)均高于[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC(84%)和[18F]FDG(44%),且差异有统计学意义。在G1(P = .004)和G2(P < .001)中,[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC的灵敏度均高于[18F]FDG。在 G3 组中,两种扫描方法都能在 100%的患者中检测到疾病。68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC和[18F]FDG PET/CT的灵敏度与Ki-67增殖指数显著相关。在G2患者中,[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC检测到的病灶数量高于[18F]FDG。结论两种PET/CT的性能,尤其是在G2和G3中的性能,显示了转移性NET的分子异质性,有助于选择更合适的治疗方法,尤其是那些可能从放射性核素治疗(PRRT)中获益的高级别患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluación de la heterogeneidad molecular en tumores neuroendocrinos mediante PET/TC con [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC y [18F]FDG

Objective

The aim of the study was evaluate the diagnostic performance of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with histologically proven neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), as well as the correlation of the visualized findings with the tumor grade.

Material and methods

We included 50 patients with NETs who underwent both [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [18F]FDG PET/TC. The pooled sensitivity of both scans was compared, as well as [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [18F]FDG for each tumor grade (grade 1 [G1], grade 2 [G2] and grade 3 [G3]). Also, the sensitivity of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [18F]FDG as a function of the continuous variable Ki-67 was investigated. Finally, the number of lesions detected by both PET radiopharmaceuticals for each tumor grade was compared.

Results

The pooled sensitivity of both PET/CT (96%) was higher than [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC (84%) and [18F]FDG (44%) separately, with statistically significant differences. The sensitivity of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC was higher than [18F]FDG in both G1 (P = .004) and G2 (P < .001). In G3 the performance of both scans detected disease in 100% of this subgroup. The sensitivity of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [18F]FDG PET/CT correlated significantly with the Ki-67 proliferative index. In G2 patients the number of lesions detected with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC was higher than [18F]FDG.

Conclusions

The performance of both PET/CT, particularly in G2 and G3, demonstrates the molecular heterogeneity of metastatic NETs and contributes to the selection of a more appropriate treatment, particularly in those high-grade patients who may benefit from radionuclide therapy (PRRT).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Espanola De Medicina Nuclear E Imagen Molecular
Revista Espanola De Medicina Nuclear E Imagen Molecular RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The Revista Española de Medicina Nuclear e Imagen Molecular (Spanish Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging), was founded in 1982, and is the official journal of the Spanish Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, which has more than 700 members. The Journal, which publishes 6 regular issues per year, has the promotion of research and continuing education in all fields of Nuclear Medicine as its main aim. For this, its principal sections are Originals, Clinical Notes, Images of Interest, and Special Collaboration articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信