Marsha Huber , Chenchen Huang , David Law , Larita Killian , Ashraf Khallaf , Paulina Kassawat , Qiongyao Zhang
{"title":"内部控制文件:归纳和反思性学习","authors":"Marsha Huber , Chenchen Huang , David Law , Larita Killian , Ashraf Khallaf , Paulina Kassawat , Qiongyao Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2024.100900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Internal Control (IC) Project required undergraduate students in introductory accounting to write a structured paper about the internal controls and weaknesses at a job at which they worked. Students had to view their practical job experiences through the lens of the course material on internal controls. For many, that view of their work changed their perceptions about the business and heightened their appreciation of their own experience and knowledge. This Educational and Teaching Note contributes to the reflective learning literature by integrating students’ real-world work experiences into the learning activities of an introductory accounting class, a strategy particularly beneficial for educating freshmen and sophomores. Students completed three distinct assignments – a short paper, a questionnaire guiding their reflections about their work experiences, and a satisfaction survey – providing a comprehensive learning experience. The reflective prompts on the questionnaire guided students in making inferences about their jobs' internal controls. An eductive approach to teaching was used, meaning to “draw out,” which also evoked reflective “Aha” moments for some students. The authors implemented the IC project at four universities – three in the United States and one in the United Arab Emirates – using qualitative techniques to assess the achievement of learning objectives. The IC project proved effective across the spectrum of contexts, irrespective of students’ socioeconomic status, college-readiness, or cultural backgrounds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The internal control paper: Eductive and reflective learning\",\"authors\":\"Marsha Huber , Chenchen Huang , David Law , Larita Killian , Ashraf Khallaf , Paulina Kassawat , Qiongyao Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2024.100900\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Internal Control (IC) Project required undergraduate students in introductory accounting to write a structured paper about the internal controls and weaknesses at a job at which they worked. Students had to view their practical job experiences through the lens of the course material on internal controls. For many, that view of their work changed their perceptions about the business and heightened their appreciation of their own experience and knowledge. This Educational and Teaching Note contributes to the reflective learning literature by integrating students’ real-world work experiences into the learning activities of an introductory accounting class, a strategy particularly beneficial for educating freshmen and sophomores. Students completed three distinct assignments – a short paper, a questionnaire guiding their reflections about their work experiences, and a satisfaction survey – providing a comprehensive learning experience. The reflective prompts on the questionnaire guided students in making inferences about their jobs' internal controls. An eductive approach to teaching was used, meaning to “draw out,” which also evoked reflective “Aha” moments for some students. The authors implemented the IC project at four universities – three in the United States and one in the United Arab Emirates – using qualitative techniques to assess the achievement of learning objectives. The IC project proved effective across the spectrum of contexts, irrespective of students’ socioeconomic status, college-readiness, or cultural backgrounds.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Accounting Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Accounting Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575124000162\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575124000162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
The internal control paper: Eductive and reflective learning
The Internal Control (IC) Project required undergraduate students in introductory accounting to write a structured paper about the internal controls and weaknesses at a job at which they worked. Students had to view their practical job experiences through the lens of the course material on internal controls. For many, that view of their work changed their perceptions about the business and heightened their appreciation of their own experience and knowledge. This Educational and Teaching Note contributes to the reflective learning literature by integrating students’ real-world work experiences into the learning activities of an introductory accounting class, a strategy particularly beneficial for educating freshmen and sophomores. Students completed three distinct assignments – a short paper, a questionnaire guiding their reflections about their work experiences, and a satisfaction survey – providing a comprehensive learning experience. The reflective prompts on the questionnaire guided students in making inferences about their jobs' internal controls. An eductive approach to teaching was used, meaning to “draw out,” which also evoked reflective “Aha” moments for some students. The authors implemented the IC project at four universities – three in the United States and one in the United Arab Emirates – using qualitative techniques to assess the achievement of learning objectives. The IC project proved effective across the spectrum of contexts, irrespective of students’ socioeconomic status, college-readiness, or cultural backgrounds.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.