比较北美婴儿出生后头两年在家庭环境中的语音和音乐输入。

IF 3.1 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Lindsay Hippe, Victoria Hennessy, Naja Ferjan Ramirez, T. Christina Zhao
{"title":"比较北美婴儿出生后头两年在家庭环境中的语音和音乐输入。","authors":"Lindsay Hippe,&nbsp;Victoria Hennessy,&nbsp;Naja Ferjan Ramirez,&nbsp;T. Christina Zhao","doi":"10.1111/desc.13528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Infants are immersed in a world of sounds from the moment their auditory system becomes functional, and experience with the auditory world shapes how their brain processes sounds in their environment. Across cultures, speech and music are two dominant auditory signals in infants’ daily lives. Decades of research have repeatedly shown that both quantity and quality of speech input play critical roles in infant language development. Less is known about the music input infants receive in their environment. This study is the first to compare music input to speech input across infancy by analyzing a longitudinal dataset of daylong audio recordings collected in English-learning infants’ home environments, at 6, 10, 14, 18, and 24 months of age. Using a crowdsourcing approach, 643 naïve listeners annotated 12,000 short snippets (10 s) randomly sampled from the recordings using Zooniverse, an online citizen-science platform. Results show that infants overall receive significantly more speech input than music input and the gap widens as the infants get older. At every age point, infants were exposed to more music from an electronic device than an in-person source; this pattern was reversed for speech. The percentage of input intended for infants remained the same over time for music while that percentage significantly increased for speech. We propose possible explanations for the limited music input compared to speech input observed in the present (North American) dataset and discuss future directions. We also discuss the opportunities and caveats in using a crowdsourcing approach to analyze large audio datasets. A video abstract of this article can be viewed at https://youtu.be/lFj_sEaBMN4</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Research Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>This study is the first to compare music input to speech input in infants’ natural home environment across infancy.</li>\n \n <li>We utilized a crowdsourcing approach to annotate a longitudinal dataset of daylong audio recordings collected in North American home environments.</li>\n \n <li>Our main results show that infants overall receive significantly more speech input than music input. This gap widens as the infants get older.</li>\n \n <li>Our results also showed that the music input was largely from electronic devices and not intended for the infants, a pattern opposite to speech input.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"27 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of speech and music input in North American infants’ home environment over the first 2 years of life\",\"authors\":\"Lindsay Hippe,&nbsp;Victoria Hennessy,&nbsp;Naja Ferjan Ramirez,&nbsp;T. Christina Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/desc.13528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>Infants are immersed in a world of sounds from the moment their auditory system becomes functional, and experience with the auditory world shapes how their brain processes sounds in their environment. Across cultures, speech and music are two dominant auditory signals in infants’ daily lives. Decades of research have repeatedly shown that both quantity and quality of speech input play critical roles in infant language development. Less is known about the music input infants receive in their environment. This study is the first to compare music input to speech input across infancy by analyzing a longitudinal dataset of daylong audio recordings collected in English-learning infants’ home environments, at 6, 10, 14, 18, and 24 months of age. Using a crowdsourcing approach, 643 naïve listeners annotated 12,000 short snippets (10 s) randomly sampled from the recordings using Zooniverse, an online citizen-science platform. Results show that infants overall receive significantly more speech input than music input and the gap widens as the infants get older. At every age point, infants were exposed to more music from an electronic device than an in-person source; this pattern was reversed for speech. The percentage of input intended for infants remained the same over time for music while that percentage significantly increased for speech. We propose possible explanations for the limited music input compared to speech input observed in the present (North American) dataset and discuss future directions. We also discuss the opportunities and caveats in using a crowdsourcing approach to analyze large audio datasets. A video abstract of this article can be viewed at https://youtu.be/lFj_sEaBMN4</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Research Highlights</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>This study is the first to compare music input to speech input in infants’ natural home environment across infancy.</li>\\n \\n <li>We utilized a crowdsourcing approach to annotate a longitudinal dataset of daylong audio recordings collected in North American home environments.</li>\\n \\n <li>Our main results show that infants overall receive significantly more speech input than music input. This gap widens as the infants get older.</li>\\n \\n <li>Our results also showed that the music input was largely from electronic devices and not intended for the infants, a pattern opposite to speech input.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Science\",\"volume\":\"27 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/desc.13528\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/desc.13528","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

婴儿从听觉系统开始运作的那一刻起,就沉浸在声音的世界里,听觉世界的经验塑造了他们大脑处理环境中声音的方式。在不同的文化中,语言和音乐是婴儿日常生活中两个主要的听觉信号。数十年的研究一再表明,语音输入的数量和质量对婴儿的语言发展起着至关重要的作用。但人们对婴儿在环境中接受的音乐输入却知之甚少。本研究通过分析在学英语的婴儿 6、10、14、18 和 24 个月大时在家庭环境中收集的全天录音纵向数据集,首次对婴儿期的音乐输入和语音输入进行了比较。采用众包方法,643 名天真无邪的听众利用在线公民科学平台 Zooniverse 对录音中随机抽样的 12,000 个短小片段(10 秒)进行了注释。结果表明,婴儿接受的语音输入总体上明显多于音乐输入,而且随着年龄的增长,这种差距会越来越大。在每个年龄段,婴儿从电子设备中接收到的音乐都多于亲身接收到的音乐;而从语音中接收到的语音则相反。随着时间的推移,针对婴儿的音乐输入比例保持不变,而语音输入的比例则显著增加。我们对目前(北美)数据集中观察到的音乐输入比语音输入有限的现象提出了可能的解释,并讨论了未来的发展方向。我们还讨论了使用众包方法分析大型音频数据集的机遇和注意事项。本文的视频摘要可在 https://youtu.be/lFj_sEaBMN4 上观看。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of speech and music input in North American infants’ home environment over the first 2 years of life

Infants are immersed in a world of sounds from the moment their auditory system becomes functional, and experience with the auditory world shapes how their brain processes sounds in their environment. Across cultures, speech and music are two dominant auditory signals in infants’ daily lives. Decades of research have repeatedly shown that both quantity and quality of speech input play critical roles in infant language development. Less is known about the music input infants receive in their environment. This study is the first to compare music input to speech input across infancy by analyzing a longitudinal dataset of daylong audio recordings collected in English-learning infants’ home environments, at 6, 10, 14, 18, and 24 months of age. Using a crowdsourcing approach, 643 naïve listeners annotated 12,000 short snippets (10 s) randomly sampled from the recordings using Zooniverse, an online citizen-science platform. Results show that infants overall receive significantly more speech input than music input and the gap widens as the infants get older. At every age point, infants were exposed to more music from an electronic device than an in-person source; this pattern was reversed for speech. The percentage of input intended for infants remained the same over time for music while that percentage significantly increased for speech. We propose possible explanations for the limited music input compared to speech input observed in the present (North American) dataset and discuss future directions. We also discuss the opportunities and caveats in using a crowdsourcing approach to analyze large audio datasets. A video abstract of this article can be viewed at https://youtu.be/lFj_sEaBMN4

Research Highlights

  • This study is the first to compare music input to speech input in infants’ natural home environment across infancy.
  • We utilized a crowdsourcing approach to annotate a longitudinal dataset of daylong audio recordings collected in North American home environments.
  • Our main results show that infants overall receive significantly more speech input than music input. This gap widens as the infants get older.
  • Our results also showed that the music input was largely from electronic devices and not intended for the infants, a pattern opposite to speech input.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: Developmental Science publishes cutting-edge theory and up-to-the-minute research on scientific developmental psychology from leading thinkers in the field. It is currently the only journal that specifically focuses on human developmental cognitive neuroscience. Coverage includes: - Clinical, computational and comparative approaches to development - Key advances in cognitive and social development - Developmental cognitive neuroscience - Functional neuroimaging of the developing brain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信