肥胖症患者心肺功能预测方程的比较和新预测模型的生成

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Marco Vecchiato, Andrea Aghi, Raffaele Nerini, Nicola Borasio, Andrea Gasperetti, Giulia Quinto, Francesca Battista, Silvia Bettini, Angelo DI Vincenzo, Andrea Ermolao, Luca Busetto, Daniel Neunhaeuserer
{"title":"肥胖症患者心肺功能预测方程的比较和新预测模型的生成","authors":"Marco Vecchiato, Andrea Aghi, Raffaele Nerini, Nicola Borasio, Andrea Gasperetti, Giulia Quinto, Francesca Battista, Silvia Bettini, Angelo DI Vincenzo, Andrea Ermolao, Luca Busetto, Daniel Neunhaeuserer","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a critical marker of overall health and a key predictor of morbidity and mortality, but the existing prediction equations for CRF are primarily derived from general populations and may not be suitable for patients with obesity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Predicted CRF from different non-exercise prediction equations was compared with measured CRF of patients with obesity who underwent maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Multiple linear regression was used to develop a population-specific nonexercise CRF prediction model for treadmill exercise including age, sex, weight, height, and physical activity level as determinants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six hundred sixty patients underwent CPET during the study period. Within the entire cohort, R2 values had a range of 0.24 to 0.46. Predicted CRF was statistically different from measured CRF for 19 of the 21 included equations. Only 50% of patients were correctly classified into the measured CRF categories according to predicted CRF. A multiple model for CRF prediction (mL·min -1 ) was generated ( R2 = 0.78) and validated using two cross-validation methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most used equations provide inaccurate estimates of CRF in patients with obesity, particularly in cases of severe obesity and low CRF. Therefore, a new prediction equation was developed and validated specifically for patients with obesity, offering a more precise tool for clinical CPET interpretation and risk stratification in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":"1732-1739"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11463033/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Cardiorespiratory Fitness Prediction Equations and Generation of New Predictive Model for Patients with Obesity.\",\"authors\":\"Marco Vecchiato, Andrea Aghi, Raffaele Nerini, Nicola Borasio, Andrea Gasperetti, Giulia Quinto, Francesca Battista, Silvia Bettini, Angelo DI Vincenzo, Andrea Ermolao, Luca Busetto, Daniel Neunhaeuserer\",\"doi\":\"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a critical marker of overall health and a key predictor of morbidity and mortality, but the existing prediction equations for CRF are primarily derived from general populations and may not be suitable for patients with obesity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Predicted CRF from different non-exercise prediction equations was compared with measured CRF of patients with obesity who underwent maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Multiple linear regression was used to develop a population-specific nonexercise CRF prediction model for treadmill exercise including age, sex, weight, height, and physical activity level as determinants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six hundred sixty patients underwent CPET during the study period. Within the entire cohort, R2 values had a range of 0.24 to 0.46. Predicted CRF was statistically different from measured CRF for 19 of the 21 included equations. Only 50% of patients were correctly classified into the measured CRF categories according to predicted CRF. A multiple model for CRF prediction (mL·min -1 ) was generated ( R2 = 0.78) and validated using two cross-validation methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most used equations provide inaccurate estimates of CRF in patients with obesity, particularly in cases of severe obesity and low CRF. Therefore, a new prediction equation was developed and validated specifically for patients with obesity, offering a more precise tool for clinical CPET interpretation and risk stratification in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1732-1739\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11463033/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003463\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003463","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:心肺功能(CRF)是整体健康的重要标志,也是预测发病率和死亡率的关键指标,但现有的心肺功能预测方程主要来自普通人群,可能并不适合肥胖症患者:方法:将不同的非运动预测方程预测的 CRF 与接受最大心肺运动测试 (CPET) 的肥胖症患者测量的 CRF 进行比较。采用多元线性回归法建立了一个针对特定人群的跑步机运动非运动CRF预测模型,包括年龄、性别、体重、身高和体力活动水平等决定因素:研究期间有 660 名患者接受了 CPET。在整个队列中,R2 值范围为 0.24-0.46。在 19 个方程中,预测的 CRF 与测量的 CRF 存在统计学差异。根据预测的 CRF,只有 50% 的患者被正确划分到测量的 CRF 类别中。得出了一个预测 CRF(毫升/分钟)的多重模型(R2 = 0.78),并通过两种交叉验证方法进行了验证:结论:大多数常用公式对肥胖症患者 CRF 的估计不准确,尤其是在重度肥胖和低 CRF 的情况下。因此,我们专门针对肥胖症患者开发了一种新的预测方程并进行了验证,为肥胖症患者的 CPET 临床解释和风险分层提供了一种更精确的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Cardiorespiratory Fitness Prediction Equations and Generation of New Predictive Model for Patients with Obesity.

Purpose: Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a critical marker of overall health and a key predictor of morbidity and mortality, but the existing prediction equations for CRF are primarily derived from general populations and may not be suitable for patients with obesity.

Methods: Predicted CRF from different non-exercise prediction equations was compared with measured CRF of patients with obesity who underwent maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Multiple linear regression was used to develop a population-specific nonexercise CRF prediction model for treadmill exercise including age, sex, weight, height, and physical activity level as determinants.

Results: Six hundred sixty patients underwent CPET during the study period. Within the entire cohort, R2 values had a range of 0.24 to 0.46. Predicted CRF was statistically different from measured CRF for 19 of the 21 included equations. Only 50% of patients were correctly classified into the measured CRF categories according to predicted CRF. A multiple model for CRF prediction (mL·min -1 ) was generated ( R2 = 0.78) and validated using two cross-validation methods.

Conclusions: Most used equations provide inaccurate estimates of CRF in patients with obesity, particularly in cases of severe obesity and low CRF. Therefore, a new prediction equation was developed and validated specifically for patients with obesity, offering a more precise tool for clinical CPET interpretation and risk stratification in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
2568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信