焦虑水平对高血压患者血压昼夜节律的影响。

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
International journal of clinical and experimental medicine Pub Date : 2015-09-15 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01
Mehmet Emre Özpelit, Ebru Özpelit, Nazile Bilgin Doğan, Nihat Pekel, Ferhat Ozyurtlu, Akar Yılmaz, Serkan Saygı, İstemihan Tengiz, Ertugrul Ercan
{"title":"焦虑水平对高血压患者血压昼夜节律的影响。","authors":"Mehmet Emre Özpelit, Ebru Özpelit, Nazile Bilgin Doğan, Nihat Pekel, Ferhat Ozyurtlu, Akar Yılmaz, Serkan Saygı, İstemihan Tengiz, Ertugrul Ercan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Considering the high prevalence rates and growing incidences of hypertension (HT) and anxiety disorders in the modern world, a full understanding of anxiety's relationship to HT is crucial. In this study we aimed to investigate the effects of anxiety level on circadian rhythm of blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive patients.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 160 previously diagnosed essential hypertensive patients (80 female, 80 male, mean age: 55.3±15.1 years). All participants underwent 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and filled State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (trait) Questionnaire. The study population was divided into 2 groups according to their STAI scores; an anxiety group (n=97; STAI ≥45) and a control group (n=63; STAI<44). Clinical characteristics, laboratory findings and ABPM measurements were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between the groups for ABPM parameters except morning blood pressure surge (MBPS). Anxiety group had a significantly higher MBPS compared to control group (14.4±17.0 vs 9.1±11.9 mmHg, P:0.03). Multivariate analysis showed that duration of HT and STAI score were the only independent predictors of MBPS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients' anxiety level is associated with MBPS which is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular complications. Assessment and control of anxiety seems to be worthy in effective treatment of hypertension.</p>","PeriodicalId":13892,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine","volume":"8 9","pages":"16252-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4659029/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of anxiety level on circadian rhythm of blood pressure in hypertensive patients.\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Emre Özpelit, Ebru Özpelit, Nazile Bilgin Doğan, Nihat Pekel, Ferhat Ozyurtlu, Akar Yılmaz, Serkan Saygı, İstemihan Tengiz, Ertugrul Ercan\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Considering the high prevalence rates and growing incidences of hypertension (HT) and anxiety disorders in the modern world, a full understanding of anxiety's relationship to HT is crucial. In this study we aimed to investigate the effects of anxiety level on circadian rhythm of blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive patients.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 160 previously diagnosed essential hypertensive patients (80 female, 80 male, mean age: 55.3±15.1 years). All participants underwent 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and filled State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (trait) Questionnaire. The study population was divided into 2 groups according to their STAI scores; an anxiety group (n=97; STAI ≥45) and a control group (n=63; STAI<44). Clinical characteristics, laboratory findings and ABPM measurements were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between the groups for ABPM parameters except morning blood pressure surge (MBPS). Anxiety group had a significantly higher MBPS compared to control group (14.4±17.0 vs 9.1±11.9 mmHg, P:0.03). Multivariate analysis showed that duration of HT and STAI score were the only independent predictors of MBPS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients' anxiety level is associated with MBPS which is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular complications. Assessment and control of anxiety seems to be worthy in effective treatment of hypertension.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine\",\"volume\":\"8 9\",\"pages\":\"16252-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4659029/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:考虑到现代社会高血压(HT)和焦虑症的高患病率和日益增长的发病率,充分了解焦虑与高血压的关系至关重要。本研究旨在探讨焦虑水平对高血压患者血压昼夜节律的影响:这项横断面研究纳入了 160 名既往确诊的原发性高血压患者(女性 80 名,男性 80 名,平均年龄:55.3±15.1 岁)。所有参与者均接受了 24 小时动态血压监测(ABPM),并填写了状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)(特质)问卷。研究对象根据其 STAI 分数被分为两组:焦虑组(97 人;STAI ≥45)和对照组(63 人;STAIR 结果:焦虑组和对照组的 STAI ≥45 分;STAIR 结果:焦虑组和对照组的 STAI ≥45 分;STAIR 结果:焦虑组和对照组的 STAI ≥45 分:除晨间血压激增(MBPS)外,两组的 ABPM 参数无明显差异。焦虑组的 MBPS 明显高于对照组(14.4±17.0 vs 9.1±11.9 mmHg,P:0.03)。多变量分析显示,高血压持续时间和 STAI 评分是唯一能独立预测 MBPS 的因素:结论:患者的焦虑水平与 MBPS 相关,而 MBPS 是心血管并发症的独立风险因素。评估和控制焦虑似乎对有效治疗高血压很有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of anxiety level on circadian rhythm of blood pressure in hypertensive patients.

Introduction: Considering the high prevalence rates and growing incidences of hypertension (HT) and anxiety disorders in the modern world, a full understanding of anxiety's relationship to HT is crucial. In this study we aimed to investigate the effects of anxiety level on circadian rhythm of blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive patients.

Material and method: This cross-sectional study included 160 previously diagnosed essential hypertensive patients (80 female, 80 male, mean age: 55.3±15.1 years). All participants underwent 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and filled State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (trait) Questionnaire. The study population was divided into 2 groups according to their STAI scores; an anxiety group (n=97; STAI ≥45) and a control group (n=63; STAI<44). Clinical characteristics, laboratory findings and ABPM measurements were compared between the groups.

Results: There was no significant difference between the groups for ABPM parameters except morning blood pressure surge (MBPS). Anxiety group had a significantly higher MBPS compared to control group (14.4±17.0 vs 9.1±11.9 mmHg, P:0.03). Multivariate analysis showed that duration of HT and STAI score were the only independent predictors of MBPS.

Conclusion: Patients' anxiety level is associated with MBPS which is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular complications. Assessment and control of anxiety seems to be worthy in effective treatment of hypertension.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信