对患有原发性或继发性/持续性牙髓感染的牙齿的龈沟和根管进行微生物群关联和特征分析。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
{"title":"对患有原发性或继发性/持续性牙髓感染的牙齿的龈沟和根管进行微生物群关联和特征分析。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.joen.2024.04.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span><span>Microbiota associated with primary </span>endodontic infection (PEI) and secondary/persistent endodontic infection (SPEI) must be characterized to elucidate pathogenesis in apical </span>periodontitis and bacterial biomarkers identified for diagnostic and therapeutic applications.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>This study analyzed the microbial community<span> profiles of root canals and gingival sulci<span> (sulcus-E) for teeth with PEI (</span></span></span><em>n</em> = 10) or SPEI (<em>n</em><span> = 10), using the Illumina MiSeq<span> platform. Bacterial samples from gingival sulci (sulcus-C) of healthy contralateral teeth served as controls.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span><span>There were 15 phyla, 177 genera, and 340 species identified. The number and diversity of bacteria in root canals did not differ significantly between PEI and SPEI. Proteobacteria, </span>Firmicutes<span><span>, Fusobacteria, </span>Bacteroidetes<span>, and Actinobacteria were the dominant phyla in both groups. At the genus level, </span></span></span><em>Lancefieldella</em>, <span><span>Bifidobacterium</span></span>, <em>Stomatobaculum</em>, and <em>Schaalia</em> were enriched in root canals with SPEI. Of significance, <em>Lancefieldella</em> was observed in both root canals and sulcus-E of teeth with SPEI. At the species level, <span><span>Neisseria</span><span><span><em> macacae, </em><span>Streptococcus gordonii</span><em>, </em></span><span>Bifidobacterium dentium</span><em>, Stomatobaculum longum</em></span></span>, and <em>Schaalia odontolytica</em> were increased significantly in root canals with SPEI compared to PEI. <em>Oribacterium</em> species<span><em>, </em><span>Streptococcus salivarius</span><span><em>, Lancefieldella parvula, </em><span>Prevotella</span><em> denticola</em></span></span>, and <em>Oribacterium asaccharolyticum</em> were more abundant in sulcus-E of teeth with SPEI compared to PEI.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There were distinctive and differing predominant bacterial species associated with the root canals and gingival sulci between teeth with PEI and SPEI. Specific bacteria identified in sulcus-E and root canals of teeth with SPEI could serve as noninvasive diagnostic biomarkers for detecting SPEI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microbiota Association and Profiling of Gingival Sulci and Root Canals of Teeth with Primary or Secondary/Persistent Endodontic Infections\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joen.2024.04.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span><span>Microbiota associated with primary </span>endodontic infection (PEI) and secondary/persistent endodontic infection (SPEI) must be characterized to elucidate pathogenesis in apical </span>periodontitis and bacterial biomarkers identified for diagnostic and therapeutic applications.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>This study analyzed the microbial community<span> profiles of root canals and gingival sulci<span> (sulcus-E) for teeth with PEI (</span></span></span><em>n</em> = 10) or SPEI (<em>n</em><span> = 10), using the Illumina MiSeq<span> platform. Bacterial samples from gingival sulci (sulcus-C) of healthy contralateral teeth served as controls.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span><span>There were 15 phyla, 177 genera, and 340 species identified. The number and diversity of bacteria in root canals did not differ significantly between PEI and SPEI. Proteobacteria, </span>Firmicutes<span><span>, Fusobacteria, </span>Bacteroidetes<span>, and Actinobacteria were the dominant phyla in both groups. At the genus level, </span></span></span><em>Lancefieldella</em>, <span><span>Bifidobacterium</span></span>, <em>Stomatobaculum</em>, and <em>Schaalia</em> were enriched in root canals with SPEI. Of significance, <em>Lancefieldella</em> was observed in both root canals and sulcus-E of teeth with SPEI. At the species level, <span><span>Neisseria</span><span><span><em> macacae, </em><span>Streptococcus gordonii</span><em>, </em></span><span>Bifidobacterium dentium</span><em>, Stomatobaculum longum</em></span></span>, and <em>Schaalia odontolytica</em> were increased significantly in root canals with SPEI compared to PEI. <em>Oribacterium</em> species<span><em>, </em><span>Streptococcus salivarius</span><span><em>, Lancefieldella parvula, </em><span>Prevotella</span><em> denticola</em></span></span>, and <em>Oribacterium asaccharolyticum</em> were more abundant in sulcus-E of teeth with SPEI compared to PEI.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There were distinctive and differing predominant bacterial species associated with the root canals and gingival sulci between teeth with PEI and SPEI. Specific bacteria identified in sulcus-E and root canals of teeth with SPEI could serve as noninvasive diagnostic biomarkers for detecting SPEI.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endodontics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099239924002796\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099239924002796","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:必须对与原发性(PEI)和继发性/顽固性(SPEI)牙髓感染相关的微生物群进行特征描述,以阐明根尖牙周炎的发病机制,并确定用于诊断和治疗的细菌生物标志物:本研究使用 Illumina MiSeq 平台分析了患有 PEI(n = 10)或 SPEI(n = 10)的牙齿的根管和龈沟(sulcus-E)的微生物群落概况。健康对侧牙齿龈沟(龈沟-C)的细菌样本作为对照:结果:共鉴定出 15 个门、177 个属和 340 个种。根管内细菌的数量和多样性在 PEI 和 SPEI 之间没有显著差异。蛋白细菌、固形菌、镰刀菌、类杆菌和放线菌是两组中的优势菌门。在属的层面上,使用 SPEI 的根管内富集了兰斯菲尔德菌属、双歧杆菌属、担子菌属和沙利亚菌属。值得注意的是,在有 SPEI 的牙齿根管和 E 沟中都观察到了兰斯菲尔德菌。在物种水平上,与 PEI 相比,使用 SPEI 的根管内的大孔奈瑟菌、戈登链球菌、双歧杆菌、长支气管畸形杆菌和畸形沙雷氏菌显著增加。与 PEI 相比,使用 SPEI 的牙齿龈沟-E 中更多的是 Oribacterium species、Streptococcus salivarius、Lancefieldella parvula、Prevotella denticola 和 Oribacterium asaccharolyticum:患有 PEI 和 SPEI 的牙齿的根管和龈沟中的主要细菌种类各不相同。在 SPEI 患牙的根管和龈沟中发现的特定细菌可作为检测 SPEI 的非侵入性诊断生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Microbiota Association and Profiling of Gingival Sulci and Root Canals of Teeth with Primary or Secondary/Persistent Endodontic Infections

Introduction

Microbiota associated with primary endodontic infection (PEI) and secondary/persistent endodontic infection (SPEI) must be characterized to elucidate pathogenesis in apical periodontitis and bacterial biomarkers identified for diagnostic and therapeutic applications.

Methods

This study analyzed the microbial community profiles of root canals and gingival sulci (sulcus-E) for teeth with PEI (n = 10) or SPEI (n = 10), using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Bacterial samples from gingival sulci (sulcus-C) of healthy contralateral teeth served as controls.

Results

There were 15 phyla, 177 genera, and 340 species identified. The number and diversity of bacteria in root canals did not differ significantly between PEI and SPEI. Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Fusobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Actinobacteria were the dominant phyla in both groups. At the genus level, Lancefieldella, Bifidobacterium, Stomatobaculum, and Schaalia were enriched in root canals with SPEI. Of significance, Lancefieldella was observed in both root canals and sulcus-E of teeth with SPEI. At the species level, Neisseria macacae, Streptococcus gordonii, Bifidobacterium dentium, Stomatobaculum longum, and Schaalia odontolytica were increased significantly in root canals with SPEI compared to PEI. Oribacterium species, Streptococcus salivarius, Lancefieldella parvula, Prevotella denticola, and Oribacterium asaccharolyticum were more abundant in sulcus-E of teeth with SPEI compared to PEI.

Conclusions

There were distinctive and differing predominant bacterial species associated with the root canals and gingival sulci between teeth with PEI and SPEI. Specific bacteria identified in sulcus-E and root canals of teeth with SPEI could serve as noninvasive diagnostic biomarkers for detecting SPEI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of endodontics
Journal of endodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
224
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endodontics, the official journal of the American Association of Endodontists, publishes scientific articles, case reports and comparison studies evaluating materials and methods of pulp conservation and endodontic treatment. Endodontists and general dentists can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation in the one journal that helps them keep pace with rapid changes in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信