治疗双相情感障碍认知障碍的 ADHD 药物。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Virginio Salvi
{"title":"治疗双相情感障碍认知障碍的 ADHD 药物。","authors":"Virginio Salvi","doi":"10.1111/bdi.13459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>People with bipolar disorders (BD) often display cognitive dysfunction, especially in verbal and working memory, processing speed and executive functions, which lead to poor occupational outcomes even more than residual symptoms.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Consequently, there is a constant effort to find treatments that might improve cognition and eventually global functioning in BD.</p><p>Several observations point to hypodopaminergic state as a driver of cognitive impairment in BD; therefore, increasing dopamine levels has been attempted as a strategy to ameliorate cognition.</p><p>Both stimulant and non-stimulant ADHD medications increase dopamine and norepinephrine brain levels, making them good candidates for treating cognitive dysfunction in BD. However, there has been a concern as to whether these medications are well tolerated, and specifically whether their use may induce (hypo)manic symptoms or episodes in persons with BD.</p><p>Stemming from these premises, the Targeting Cognition task force of the International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) conducted a systematic review on the efficacy and tolerability of ADHD medications in treating cognitive dysfunction in BD.<span><sup>2</sup></span></p><p>The review reassures on tolerability, concluding that when BD is properly stabilized, the risk of treatment-emergent manic episodes due to the use of stimulant or non-stimulant ADHD medications is not higher than with placebo or other control conditions. Thus, methylphenidate, lisdexamfetamine, armodafinil, modafinil or bupropion can be safely employed unless BD is pharmacologically stabilized. Beyond the reviewed evidence coming from Randomized Controlled Trials, a large Swedish registry study on 2307 adults with BD who later initiated methylphenidate for concurrent ADHD found no evidence for an association between methylphenidate and treatment-emergent mania among those on concomitant mood stabilizers. On the other hand, those treated with the stimulant alone had a 6.7 times increased rate of manic episodes within 3 months of medication initiation.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Hence, we might say that there is sufficient evidence not to discourage the use of ADHD medications in adequately stabilized BD.</p><p>However, the most compelling research aim was to review the efficacy of ADHD medications as cognitive enhancers in BD: the authors, based on evidence coming from three studies, concluded that there is insufficient data to assert that ADHD medications can improve cognition in BD. The first reviewed study was designed to assess the efficacy of adjunctive methylphenidate in reducing manic symptoms in acutely manic subjects. For safety reasons, the study lasted 2.5 days, after which methylphenidate was deemed ineffective and therefore stopped. The very short period of observation likely speaks for the observed lack of cognitive effect of methylphenidate. The second study, which evaluated the pro-cognitive effects of clonidine on manic subjects, employed the Mini-Mental State Examination, which is a general cognitive screening tool for dementia in the elderly and most likely lacks the sensitivity to assess subtle changes in specific cognitive functions.</p><p>Of note, both studies evaluated cognition during an acute manic episode. The assessment of cognition in mania is inherently difficult because of the distractibility, impulsivity and oftentimes lack of cooperation. Moreover, it can be argued that cognitive impairment influenced or caused by manic core symptoms would mostly resolve when the episode ends; therefore, cognition should preferably be assessed during euthymia rather than the acute phases of the disorder, as pointed out by the ISBD panel itself.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Of the three studies reported, only one was specifically designed to assess the effect of adjunctive modafinil on cognition in BD. The study was conducted on either euthymic or minimally ill subjects with BD and employed a comprehensive battery to assess cognition. However, the greater improvement in processing speed and verbal learning with modafinil than with placebo was only marginally significant, clearly due to the very small sample size (12 subjects overall).</p><p>In recent years, two metanalyses evaluated the effect of methylphenidate and other ADHD medications on cognitive impairment in children/adolescents and adults with ADHD.<span><sup>5, 6</sup></span> The effect was small in domains such as processing speed, memory spam and working memory, although—in children/adolescents—a dose-effect correlation was demonstrated for methylphenidate, with higher doses leading to greater improvements.<span><sup>5</sup></span> Nevertheless, both papers concluded that the magnitude of effect exerted by ADHD medications is much greater on ADHD symptoms than on cognitive functions, where in most cases only small-to-moderate effect sizes could be retrieved.</p><p>One lesson that can be drawn from these metanalyses and from Miskowiak et al. systematic review is that future studies assessing the impact of cognitive enhancers on cognition in BD should employ a sounder methodology. In other words, researchers will need to include adequately numbered samples of subjects with BD in euthymic or at least partially remitted state and assess their cognitive functions with a comprehensive cognitive battery over several weeks of treatment. Finally, since the improvement of at least some cognitive domains may depend upon the dose, future studies should ideally assess the differential efficacy of different dosages of the index compound on cognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":8959,"journal":{"name":"Bipolar Disorders","volume":"26 6","pages":"620-621"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bdi.13459","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ADHD medications for cognitive impairment in bipolar disorders\",\"authors\":\"Virginio Salvi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bdi.13459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>People with bipolar disorders (BD) often display cognitive dysfunction, especially in verbal and working memory, processing speed and executive functions, which lead to poor occupational outcomes even more than residual symptoms.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Consequently, there is a constant effort to find treatments that might improve cognition and eventually global functioning in BD.</p><p>Several observations point to hypodopaminergic state as a driver of cognitive impairment in BD; therefore, increasing dopamine levels has been attempted as a strategy to ameliorate cognition.</p><p>Both stimulant and non-stimulant ADHD medications increase dopamine and norepinephrine brain levels, making them good candidates for treating cognitive dysfunction in BD. However, there has been a concern as to whether these medications are well tolerated, and specifically whether their use may induce (hypo)manic symptoms or episodes in persons with BD.</p><p>Stemming from these premises, the Targeting Cognition task force of the International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) conducted a systematic review on the efficacy and tolerability of ADHD medications in treating cognitive dysfunction in BD.<span><sup>2</sup></span></p><p>The review reassures on tolerability, concluding that when BD is properly stabilized, the risk of treatment-emergent manic episodes due to the use of stimulant or non-stimulant ADHD medications is not higher than with placebo or other control conditions. Thus, methylphenidate, lisdexamfetamine, armodafinil, modafinil or bupropion can be safely employed unless BD is pharmacologically stabilized. Beyond the reviewed evidence coming from Randomized Controlled Trials, a large Swedish registry study on 2307 adults with BD who later initiated methylphenidate for concurrent ADHD found no evidence for an association between methylphenidate and treatment-emergent mania among those on concomitant mood stabilizers. On the other hand, those treated with the stimulant alone had a 6.7 times increased rate of manic episodes within 3 months of medication initiation.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Hence, we might say that there is sufficient evidence not to discourage the use of ADHD medications in adequately stabilized BD.</p><p>However, the most compelling research aim was to review the efficacy of ADHD medications as cognitive enhancers in BD: the authors, based on evidence coming from three studies, concluded that there is insufficient data to assert that ADHD medications can improve cognition in BD. The first reviewed study was designed to assess the efficacy of adjunctive methylphenidate in reducing manic symptoms in acutely manic subjects. For safety reasons, the study lasted 2.5 days, after which methylphenidate was deemed ineffective and therefore stopped. The very short period of observation likely speaks for the observed lack of cognitive effect of methylphenidate. The second study, which evaluated the pro-cognitive effects of clonidine on manic subjects, employed the Mini-Mental State Examination, which is a general cognitive screening tool for dementia in the elderly and most likely lacks the sensitivity to assess subtle changes in specific cognitive functions.</p><p>Of note, both studies evaluated cognition during an acute manic episode. The assessment of cognition in mania is inherently difficult because of the distractibility, impulsivity and oftentimes lack of cooperation. Moreover, it can be argued that cognitive impairment influenced or caused by manic core symptoms would mostly resolve when the episode ends; therefore, cognition should preferably be assessed during euthymia rather than the acute phases of the disorder, as pointed out by the ISBD panel itself.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Of the three studies reported, only one was specifically designed to assess the effect of adjunctive modafinil on cognition in BD. The study was conducted on either euthymic or minimally ill subjects with BD and employed a comprehensive battery to assess cognition. However, the greater improvement in processing speed and verbal learning with modafinil than with placebo was only marginally significant, clearly due to the very small sample size (12 subjects overall).</p><p>In recent years, two metanalyses evaluated the effect of methylphenidate and other ADHD medications on cognitive impairment in children/adolescents and adults with ADHD.<span><sup>5, 6</sup></span> The effect was small in domains such as processing speed, memory spam and working memory, although—in children/adolescents—a dose-effect correlation was demonstrated for methylphenidate, with higher doses leading to greater improvements.<span><sup>5</sup></span> Nevertheless, both papers concluded that the magnitude of effect exerted by ADHD medications is much greater on ADHD symptoms than on cognitive functions, where in most cases only small-to-moderate effect sizes could be retrieved.</p><p>One lesson that can be drawn from these metanalyses and from Miskowiak et al. systematic review is that future studies assessing the impact of cognitive enhancers on cognition in BD should employ a sounder methodology. In other words, researchers will need to include adequately numbered samples of subjects with BD in euthymic or at least partially remitted state and assess their cognitive functions with a comprehensive cognitive battery over several weeks of treatment. Finally, since the improvement of at least some cognitive domains may depend upon the dose, future studies should ideally assess the differential efficacy of different dosages of the index compound on cognition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bipolar Disorders\",\"volume\":\"26 6\",\"pages\":\"620-621\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bdi.13459\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bipolar Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bdi.13459\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bipolar Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bdi.13459","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

双相情感障碍(BD)患者通常表现出认知功能障碍,尤其是在言语和工作记忆、处理速度和执行功能方面,这比残留症状更容易导致不良的职业后果。因此,人们一直在努力寻找可以改善认知功能并最终改善 BD 整体功能的治疗方法。一些观察结果表明,多巴胺能低下状态是 BD 认知功能障碍的驱动因素;因此,人们尝试将提高多巴胺水平作为改善认知功能的策略。刺激性和非刺激性 ADHD 药物均可提高大脑多巴胺和去甲肾上腺素水平,因此是治疗 BD 认知功能障碍的理想药物。基于这些前提,国际双相情感障碍协会(ISBD)"以认知为目标 "工作组对多动症药物治疗双相情感障碍患者认知功能障碍的疗效和耐受性进行了系统回顾。该综述对耐受性给予了肯定,认为在 BD 得到适当稳定的情况下,因使用兴奋剂或非兴奋剂 ADHD 药物而导致治疗引发躁狂发作的风险并不比使用安慰剂或其他对照条件高。因此,除非对 BD 进行药物稳定,否则可以安全地使用哌醋甲酯、利眠宁、阿莫达非尼、莫达非尼或安非他明。除了来自随机对照试验的审查证据外,瑞典的一项大型登记研究也发现,在同时服用情绪稳定剂的患者中,没有证据表明哌醋甲酯与治疗引发的躁狂症之间存在关联,该研究针对的是 2307 名患有 BD 的成年人,他们后来开始服用哌醋甲酯治疗并发多动症。3 因此,我们可以说,有足够的证据表明,在病情充分稳定的 BD 患者中,并不妨碍使用 ADHD 药物。然而,最引人注目的研究目的是审查 ADHD 药物作为 BD 认知增强剂的疗效:作者根据三项研究的证据得出结论,认为没有足够的数据可以断言 ADHD 药物可以改善 BD 的认知能力。第一项研究旨在评估哌醋甲酯辅助治疗对减轻急性躁狂症患者躁狂症状的疗效。出于安全考虑,研究持续了 2.5 天,之后哌醋甲酯被认为无效,因此停止了研究。观察时间很短很可能是哌醋甲酯对认知缺乏影响的原因。第二项研究评估了氯硝柳胺对躁狂症受试者的认知促进作用,该研究采用了小型精神状态检查(Mini-Mental State Examination),这是一种针对老年痴呆症的通用认知筛查工具,很可能缺乏评估特定认知功能细微变化的敏感性。值得注意的是,这两项研究都对急性躁狂症发作时的认知能力进行了评估。由于躁狂症患者注意力分散、易冲动,而且经常缺乏合作,因此对其认知能力进行评估本身就很困难。此外,有人认为,躁狂症核心症状影响或导致的认知障碍大多会在发作结束后消失;因此,正如 ISBD 专家小组本身所指出的那样,最好在躁狂症的恢复期而非急性期对认知能力进行评估。这项研究的对象是抑郁症患者或轻度抑郁症患者,并采用了全面的认知评估方法。然而,与安慰剂相比,莫达非尼对处理速度和言语学习的改善仅有轻微的显著性,这显然是由于样本量非常小(总共 12 名受试者)、6 虽然在儿童/青少年中,哌醋甲酯的剂量效应相关,剂量越大,改善越大,但在处理速度、记忆痉挛和工作记忆等领域的影响很小。尽管如此,这两篇论文都得出结论,ADHD 药物对 ADHD 症状的影响程度远大于对认知功能的影响程度,在大多数情况下,只能得出小到中等的效应大小。从这些元分析和 Miskowiak 等人的系统综述中可以得出的一个教训是,未来评估认知增强剂对 BD 认知影响的研究应采用更合理的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ADHD medications for cognitive impairment in bipolar disorders

People with bipolar disorders (BD) often display cognitive dysfunction, especially in verbal and working memory, processing speed and executive functions, which lead to poor occupational outcomes even more than residual symptoms.1 Consequently, there is a constant effort to find treatments that might improve cognition and eventually global functioning in BD.

Several observations point to hypodopaminergic state as a driver of cognitive impairment in BD; therefore, increasing dopamine levels has been attempted as a strategy to ameliorate cognition.

Both stimulant and non-stimulant ADHD medications increase dopamine and norepinephrine brain levels, making them good candidates for treating cognitive dysfunction in BD. However, there has been a concern as to whether these medications are well tolerated, and specifically whether their use may induce (hypo)manic symptoms or episodes in persons with BD.

Stemming from these premises, the Targeting Cognition task force of the International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) conducted a systematic review on the efficacy and tolerability of ADHD medications in treating cognitive dysfunction in BD.2

The review reassures on tolerability, concluding that when BD is properly stabilized, the risk of treatment-emergent manic episodes due to the use of stimulant or non-stimulant ADHD medications is not higher than with placebo or other control conditions. Thus, methylphenidate, lisdexamfetamine, armodafinil, modafinil or bupropion can be safely employed unless BD is pharmacologically stabilized. Beyond the reviewed evidence coming from Randomized Controlled Trials, a large Swedish registry study on 2307 adults with BD who later initiated methylphenidate for concurrent ADHD found no evidence for an association between methylphenidate and treatment-emergent mania among those on concomitant mood stabilizers. On the other hand, those treated with the stimulant alone had a 6.7 times increased rate of manic episodes within 3 months of medication initiation.3 Hence, we might say that there is sufficient evidence not to discourage the use of ADHD medications in adequately stabilized BD.

However, the most compelling research aim was to review the efficacy of ADHD medications as cognitive enhancers in BD: the authors, based on evidence coming from three studies, concluded that there is insufficient data to assert that ADHD medications can improve cognition in BD. The first reviewed study was designed to assess the efficacy of adjunctive methylphenidate in reducing manic symptoms in acutely manic subjects. For safety reasons, the study lasted 2.5 days, after which methylphenidate was deemed ineffective and therefore stopped. The very short period of observation likely speaks for the observed lack of cognitive effect of methylphenidate. The second study, which evaluated the pro-cognitive effects of clonidine on manic subjects, employed the Mini-Mental State Examination, which is a general cognitive screening tool for dementia in the elderly and most likely lacks the sensitivity to assess subtle changes in specific cognitive functions.

Of note, both studies evaluated cognition during an acute manic episode. The assessment of cognition in mania is inherently difficult because of the distractibility, impulsivity and oftentimes lack of cooperation. Moreover, it can be argued that cognitive impairment influenced or caused by manic core symptoms would mostly resolve when the episode ends; therefore, cognition should preferably be assessed during euthymia rather than the acute phases of the disorder, as pointed out by the ISBD panel itself.4 Of the three studies reported, only one was specifically designed to assess the effect of adjunctive modafinil on cognition in BD. The study was conducted on either euthymic or minimally ill subjects with BD and employed a comprehensive battery to assess cognition. However, the greater improvement in processing speed and verbal learning with modafinil than with placebo was only marginally significant, clearly due to the very small sample size (12 subjects overall).

In recent years, two metanalyses evaluated the effect of methylphenidate and other ADHD medications on cognitive impairment in children/adolescents and adults with ADHD.5, 6 The effect was small in domains such as processing speed, memory spam and working memory, although—in children/adolescents—a dose-effect correlation was demonstrated for methylphenidate, with higher doses leading to greater improvements.5 Nevertheless, both papers concluded that the magnitude of effect exerted by ADHD medications is much greater on ADHD symptoms than on cognitive functions, where in most cases only small-to-moderate effect sizes could be retrieved.

One lesson that can be drawn from these metanalyses and from Miskowiak et al. systematic review is that future studies assessing the impact of cognitive enhancers on cognition in BD should employ a sounder methodology. In other words, researchers will need to include adequately numbered samples of subjects with BD in euthymic or at least partially remitted state and assess their cognitive functions with a comprehensive cognitive battery over several weeks of treatment. Finally, since the improvement of at least some cognitive domains may depend upon the dose, future studies should ideally assess the differential efficacy of different dosages of the index compound on cognition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bipolar Disorders
Bipolar Disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bipolar Disorders is an international journal that publishes all research of relevance for the basic mechanisms, clinical aspects, or treatment of bipolar disorders and related illnesses. It intends to provide a single international outlet for new research in this area and covers research in the following areas: biochemistry physiology neuropsychopharmacology neuroanatomy neuropathology genetics brain imaging epidemiology phenomenology clinical aspects and therapeutics of bipolar disorders Bipolar Disorders also contains papers that form the development of new therapeutic strategies for these disorders as well as papers on the topics of schizoaffective disorders, and depressive disorders as these can be cyclic disorders with areas of overlap with bipolar disorders. The journal will consider for publication submissions within the domain of: Perspectives, Research Articles, Correspondence, Clinical Corner, and Reflections. Within these there are a number of types of articles: invited editorials, debates, review articles, original articles, commentaries, letters to the editors, clinical conundrums, clinical curiosities, clinical care, and musings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信