通过自我监督机器学习来描述英国生物库中腕戴式加速度计的步数。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Scott R Small, Shing Chan, Rosemary Walmsley, Lennart VON Fritsch, Aidan Acquah, Gert Mertes, Benjamin G Feakins, Andrew Creagh, Adam Strange, Charles E Matthews, David A Clifton, Andrew J Price, Sara Khalid, Derrick Bennett, Aiden Doherty
{"title":"通过自我监督机器学习来描述英国生物库中腕戴式加速度计的步数。","authors":"Scott R Small, Shing Chan, Rosemary Walmsley, Lennart VON Fritsch, Aidan Acquah, Gert Mertes, Benjamin G Feakins, Andrew Creagh, Adam Strange, Charles E Matthews, David A Clifton, Andrew J Price, Sara Khalid, Derrick Bennett, Aiden Doherty","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Step count is an intuitive measure of physical activity frequently quantified in health-related studies; however, accurate step counting is difficult in the free-living environment, with error routinely above 20% in wrist-worn devices against camera-annotated ground truth. This study aimed to describe the development and validation of step count derived from a wrist-worn accelerometer and assess its association with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in a large prospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed and externally validated a self-supervised machine learning step detection model, trained on an open-source and step-annotated free-living dataset. Thirty-nine individuals will free-living ground-truth annotated step counts were used for model development. An open-source dataset with 30 individuals was used for external validation. Epidemiological analysis was performed using 75,263 UK Biobank participants without prevalent cardiovascular disease (CVD) or cancer. Cox regression was used to test the association of daily step count with fatal CVD and all-cause mortality after adjustment for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The algorithm substantially outperformed reference models (free-living mean absolute percent error of 12.5% vs 65%-231%). Our data indicate an inverse dose-response association, where taking 6430-8277 daily steps was associated with 37% (25%-48%) and 28% (20%-35%) lower risk of fatal CVD and all-cause mortality up to 7 yr later, compared with those taking fewer steps each day.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have developed an open and transparent method that markedly improves the measurement of steps in large-scale wrist-worn accelerometer datasets. The application of this method demonstrated expected associations with CVD and all-cause mortality, indicating excellent face validity. This reinforces public health messaging for increasing physical activity and can help lay the groundwork for the inclusion of target step counts in future public health guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11402590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-Supervised Machine Learning to Characterize Step Counts from Wrist-Worn Accelerometers in the UK Biobank.\",\"authors\":\"Scott R Small, Shing Chan, Rosemary Walmsley, Lennart VON Fritsch, Aidan Acquah, Gert Mertes, Benjamin G Feakins, Andrew Creagh, Adam Strange, Charles E Matthews, David A Clifton, Andrew J Price, Sara Khalid, Derrick Bennett, Aiden Doherty\",\"doi\":\"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Step count is an intuitive measure of physical activity frequently quantified in health-related studies; however, accurate step counting is difficult in the free-living environment, with error routinely above 20% in wrist-worn devices against camera-annotated ground truth. This study aimed to describe the development and validation of step count derived from a wrist-worn accelerometer and assess its association with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in a large prospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed and externally validated a self-supervised machine learning step detection model, trained on an open-source and step-annotated free-living dataset. Thirty-nine individuals will free-living ground-truth annotated step counts were used for model development. An open-source dataset with 30 individuals was used for external validation. Epidemiological analysis was performed using 75,263 UK Biobank participants without prevalent cardiovascular disease (CVD) or cancer. Cox regression was used to test the association of daily step count with fatal CVD and all-cause mortality after adjustment for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The algorithm substantially outperformed reference models (free-living mean absolute percent error of 12.5% vs 65%-231%). Our data indicate an inverse dose-response association, where taking 6430-8277 daily steps was associated with 37% (25%-48%) and 28% (20%-35%) lower risk of fatal CVD and all-cause mortality up to 7 yr later, compared with those taking fewer steps each day.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have developed an open and transparent method that markedly improves the measurement of steps in large-scale wrist-worn accelerometer datasets. The application of this method demonstrated expected associations with CVD and all-cause mortality, indicating excellent face validity. This reinforces public health messaging for increasing physical activity and can help lay the groundwork for the inclusion of target step counts in future public health guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11402590/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003478\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003478","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:步数是衡量身体活动的直观指标,在与健康相关的研究中经常被量化;然而,在自由生活环境中很难精确计算步数,腕戴式设备与相机标注的地面真实值之间的误差通常超过 20%。本研究旨在描述腕戴式加速度计步数的开发和验证过程,并在一个大型前瞻性队列中评估其与心血管疾病和全因死亡率的关系:我们开发了一种自我监督的机器学习步数检测模型,并在外部进行了验证,该模型是在一个开源的、有步数标注的自由生活数据集上训练的。模型的开发使用了 39 个人的自由生活地面实况注释步数。一个包含 30 个个体的开源数据集用于外部验证。流行病学分析使用了 75,263 名未患心血管疾病(CVD)或癌症的英国生物库参与者。在对潜在混杂因素进行调整后,使用 Cox 回归检验了每日步数与致命心血管疾病和全因死亡率之间的关系:结果:该算法大大优于参考模型(自由生活平均绝对百分误差为 12.5%,而参考模型为 65-231%)。我们的数据表明存在反向剂量-反应关系,与每天步行较少的人相比,每天步行6430-8277步与七年后致命心血管疾病和全因死亡风险分别降低37% [25-48%]和28% [20-35%]有关:我们开发了一种公开、透明的方法,可显著改善大规模腕戴式加速度计数据集中的步数测量。这种方法的应用证明了与心血管疾病和全因死亡率之间的预期关联,显示了极好的表面效度。这强化了增加体育锻炼的公共卫生信息,有助于为将目标步数纳入未来的公共卫生指南奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self-Supervised Machine Learning to Characterize Step Counts from Wrist-Worn Accelerometers in the UK Biobank.

Purpose: Step count is an intuitive measure of physical activity frequently quantified in health-related studies; however, accurate step counting is difficult in the free-living environment, with error routinely above 20% in wrist-worn devices against camera-annotated ground truth. This study aimed to describe the development and validation of step count derived from a wrist-worn accelerometer and assess its association with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in a large prospective cohort.

Methods: We developed and externally validated a self-supervised machine learning step detection model, trained on an open-source and step-annotated free-living dataset. Thirty-nine individuals will free-living ground-truth annotated step counts were used for model development. An open-source dataset with 30 individuals was used for external validation. Epidemiological analysis was performed using 75,263 UK Biobank participants without prevalent cardiovascular disease (CVD) or cancer. Cox regression was used to test the association of daily step count with fatal CVD and all-cause mortality after adjustment for potential confounders.

Results: The algorithm substantially outperformed reference models (free-living mean absolute percent error of 12.5% vs 65%-231%). Our data indicate an inverse dose-response association, where taking 6430-8277 daily steps was associated with 37% (25%-48%) and 28% (20%-35%) lower risk of fatal CVD and all-cause mortality up to 7 yr later, compared with those taking fewer steps each day.

Conclusions: We have developed an open and transparent method that markedly improves the measurement of steps in large-scale wrist-worn accelerometer datasets. The application of this method demonstrated expected associations with CVD and all-cause mortality, indicating excellent face validity. This reinforces public health messaging for increasing physical activity and can help lay the groundwork for the inclusion of target step counts in future public health guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
2568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信