工作场所健康文化与对职业健康办公室的信任:对肉类包装工人的描述性研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sheri Rowland PhD, MSN, APRN-BC, FNP, Rishad Ahmed MBA, Maria Jose Sanchez Roman MD, MPH, Athena K. Ramos PhD, MBA, MS, CPM
{"title":"工作场所健康文化与对职业健康办公室的信任:对肉类包装工人的描述性研究。","authors":"Sheri Rowland PhD, MSN, APRN-BC, FNP,&nbsp;Rishad Ahmed MBA,&nbsp;Maria Jose Sanchez Roman MD, MPH,&nbsp;Athena K. Ramos PhD, MBA, MS, CPM","doi":"10.1002/ajim.23617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Worker trust in employer-provided occupational health services has not been explored in essential industries, such as meatpacking. The purpose of this study was to describe workplace health culture and trust in the occupational health office and highlight meatpacking workers' experiences with the occupational health office.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Meatpacking workers were surveyed between February 2021 and October 2022. Descriptive statistics and nonparametric tests were used to explore trust across demographic variables, including workplace health culture. Thematic analysis was used to examine the short-answer qualitative data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among workers who completed surveys (<i>n</i> = 731), health culture was rated low (<i>M</i> = 1.3 (0.73); possible range 0-3). Trust in the occupational health office was also rated low (<i>M</i> = 8.2 (5.06); possible range 0–20). Workers' descriptions of interactions with the occupational health office were mostly unfavorable (287 negative opinion units; 97 positive opinion units) and primarily focused on quality of care, communication, the supervisor as gatekeeper to health services, and the prioritization of company interests.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Meatpacking worker health may be improved by building worker trust in the occupational health office. Suggested strategies include enhanced communication, protection of confidentiality, prioritization of worker well-being, and promotion of a stronger health culture in plants and throughout the industry. Supporting workers without a regular healthcare provider to establish a relationship with a primary care provider of their choice is also recommended.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajim.23617","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Workplace health culture and trust in the occupational health office: A descriptive study of meatpacking workers\",\"authors\":\"Sheri Rowland PhD, MSN, APRN-BC, FNP,&nbsp;Rishad Ahmed MBA,&nbsp;Maria Jose Sanchez Roman MD, MPH,&nbsp;Athena K. Ramos PhD, MBA, MS, CPM\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajim.23617\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Worker trust in employer-provided occupational health services has not been explored in essential industries, such as meatpacking. The purpose of this study was to describe workplace health culture and trust in the occupational health office and highlight meatpacking workers' experiences with the occupational health office.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Meatpacking workers were surveyed between February 2021 and October 2022. Descriptive statistics and nonparametric tests were used to explore trust across demographic variables, including workplace health culture. Thematic analysis was used to examine the short-answer qualitative data.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Among workers who completed surveys (<i>n</i> = 731), health culture was rated low (<i>M</i> = 1.3 (0.73); possible range 0-3). Trust in the occupational health office was also rated low (<i>M</i> = 8.2 (5.06); possible range 0–20). Workers' descriptions of interactions with the occupational health office were mostly unfavorable (287 negative opinion units; 97 positive opinion units) and primarily focused on quality of care, communication, the supervisor as gatekeeper to health services, and the prioritization of company interests.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Meatpacking worker health may be improved by building worker trust in the occupational health office. Suggested strategies include enhanced communication, protection of confidentiality, prioritization of worker well-being, and promotion of a stronger health culture in plants and throughout the industry. Supporting workers without a regular healthcare provider to establish a relationship with a primary care provider of their choice is also recommended.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of industrial medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajim.23617\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of industrial medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajim.23617\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of industrial medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajim.23617","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:工人对雇主提供的职业健康服务的信任度尚未在肉类包装等基本行业中得到探讨。本研究的目的是描述工作场所的健康文化和对职业健康办公室的信任,并强调肉类包装工人对职业健康办公室的体验:方法:在 2021 年 2 月至 2022 年 10 月期间对肉类包装工人进行了调查。使用描述性统计和非参数检验来探讨不同人口统计学变量之间的信任度,包括工作场所健康文化。专题分析用于研究简答定性数据:在完成调查的工人(n = 731)中,健康文化的评分较低(M = 1.3 (0.73);可能范围为 0-3)。对职业健康办公室的信任度也较低(M = 8.2 (5.06);可能范围 0-20)。工人对与职业健康办公室互动的描述大多是负面的(287 个负面意见单位;97 个正面意见单位),主要集中在医疗质量、沟通、作为健康服务守门人的主管以及公司利益优先等方面:结论:通过建立工人对职业健康办公室的信任,可以改善肉类包装工人的健康状况。建议采取的策略包括加强沟通、保护机密、优先考虑工人的健康,以及在工厂和整个行业推广更强大的健康文化。此外,还建议为没有固定医疗服务提供者的工人提供支持,帮助他们与自己选择的初级医疗服务提供者建立联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Workplace health culture and trust in the occupational health office: A descriptive study of meatpacking workers

Introduction

Worker trust in employer-provided occupational health services has not been explored in essential industries, such as meatpacking. The purpose of this study was to describe workplace health culture and trust in the occupational health office and highlight meatpacking workers' experiences with the occupational health office.

Methods

Meatpacking workers were surveyed between February 2021 and October 2022. Descriptive statistics and nonparametric tests were used to explore trust across demographic variables, including workplace health culture. Thematic analysis was used to examine the short-answer qualitative data.

Results

Among workers who completed surveys (n = 731), health culture was rated low (M = 1.3 (0.73); possible range 0-3). Trust in the occupational health office was also rated low (M = 8.2 (5.06); possible range 0–20). Workers' descriptions of interactions with the occupational health office were mostly unfavorable (287 negative opinion units; 97 positive opinion units) and primarily focused on quality of care, communication, the supervisor as gatekeeper to health services, and the prioritization of company interests.

Conclusion

Meatpacking worker health may be improved by building worker trust in the occupational health office. Suggested strategies include enhanced communication, protection of confidentiality, prioritization of worker well-being, and promotion of a stronger health culture in plants and throughout the industry. Supporting workers without a regular healthcare provider to establish a relationship with a primary care provider of their choice is also recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of industrial medicine
American journal of industrial medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.70%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Industrial Medicine considers for publication reports of original research, review articles, instructive case reports, and analyses of policy in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety. The Journal also accepts commentaries, book reviews and letters of comment and criticism. The goals of the journal are to advance and disseminate knowledge, promote research and foster the prevention of disease and injury. Specific topics of interest include: occupational disease; environmental disease; pesticides; cancer; occupational epidemiology; environmental epidemiology; disease surveillance systems; ergonomics; dust diseases; lead poisoning; neurotoxicology; endocrine disruptors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信