加拿大滨海地区 COVID-19 大流行期间利益相关者对校本免疫计划的体验:定性研究

IF 2.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Allyson J. Gallant , Catie Johnson , Audrey Steenbeek , Jeanna Parsons Leigh , Scott A. Halperin , Janet A. Curran
{"title":"加拿大滨海地区 COVID-19 大流行期间利益相关者对校本免疫计划的体验:定性研究","authors":"Allyson J. Gallant ,&nbsp;Catie Johnson ,&nbsp;Audrey Steenbeek ,&nbsp;Jeanna Parsons Leigh ,&nbsp;Scott A. Halperin ,&nbsp;Janet A. Curran","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>School-based immunization programs (SBIP) support access to routine vaccines for adolescents. Across Canada, the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent public health measures affected SBIP and vaccine uptake. The objectives of this study were to explore 1.) stakeholders' experiences with SBIP and changes to programs during COVID-19 in Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island and New Brunswick, and 2.) how the pandemic affected parents' and adolescents’ vaccine views.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Semi-structured interviews with decision makers, healthcare providers, teachers, parents and adolescents between February–August 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The COM-B model and Theoretical Domains Framework informed interview guides. Deductive and inductive analyses saw participant quotes mapped to relevant model components and domains by two coders. Belief statements were generated within each stakeholder group then compared to identify themes and subthemes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants (n = 39) identified five themes: 1) enablers to SBIP delivery, 2) barriers to SBIP delivery, 3) desired changes to SBIP delivery, 4) student anxiety, and 5) vaccination views and changes since the COVID-19 pandemic. Public health measures facilitated more space for clinics, as did taking smaller cohorts of students. School staff-healthcare provider relationships could help or hinder programs, particularly with high turnover in both professions during the pandemic. Adolescents played a passive role in vaccine decision making, with mothers often being the sole decision maker. We did not identify any changes in hesitancy towards routine vaccines since the pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We identified a range of barriers and enablers to SBIP, many of which were exacerbated by the pandemic. Efforts are needed to ensure SBIP and catch-up programming remains accessible for all adolescents to catch-up on missed vaccines before graduation. Parents and adolescents’ vaccination views suggest changes in vaccine coverage since the pandemic may be due to accessibility of services rather than vaccine hesitancy. Future research is needed to engage adolescents in their vaccine decisions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100505"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000429/pdfft?md5=7e091361c78202ffecfdb12e32e7adb7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666535224000429-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stakeholders’ experiences with school-based immunization programs during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Canadian Maritimes: A qualitative study\",\"authors\":\"Allyson J. Gallant ,&nbsp;Catie Johnson ,&nbsp;Audrey Steenbeek ,&nbsp;Jeanna Parsons Leigh ,&nbsp;Scott A. Halperin ,&nbsp;Janet A. Curran\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>School-based immunization programs (SBIP) support access to routine vaccines for adolescents. Across Canada, the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent public health measures affected SBIP and vaccine uptake. The objectives of this study were to explore 1.) stakeholders' experiences with SBIP and changes to programs during COVID-19 in Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island and New Brunswick, and 2.) how the pandemic affected parents' and adolescents’ vaccine views.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Semi-structured interviews with decision makers, healthcare providers, teachers, parents and adolescents between February–August 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The COM-B model and Theoretical Domains Framework informed interview guides. Deductive and inductive analyses saw participant quotes mapped to relevant model components and domains by two coders. Belief statements were generated within each stakeholder group then compared to identify themes and subthemes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants (n = 39) identified five themes: 1) enablers to SBIP delivery, 2) barriers to SBIP delivery, 3) desired changes to SBIP delivery, 4) student anxiety, and 5) vaccination views and changes since the COVID-19 pandemic. Public health measures facilitated more space for clinics, as did taking smaller cohorts of students. School staff-healthcare provider relationships could help or hinder programs, particularly with high turnover in both professions during the pandemic. Adolescents played a passive role in vaccine decision making, with mothers often being the sole decision maker. We did not identify any changes in hesitancy towards routine vaccines since the pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We identified a range of barriers and enablers to SBIP, many of which were exacerbated by the pandemic. Efforts are needed to ensure SBIP and catch-up programming remains accessible for all adolescents to catch-up on missed vaccines before graduation. Parents and adolescents’ vaccination views suggest changes in vaccine coverage since the pandemic may be due to accessibility of services rather than vaccine hesitancy. Future research is needed to engage adolescents in their vaccine decisions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health in Practice\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100505\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000429/pdfft?md5=7e091361c78202ffecfdb12e32e7adb7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666535224000429-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000429\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景校本免疫计划 (SBIP) 支持青少年接种常规疫苗。在加拿大全国,COVID-19 大流行和随后的公共卫生措施影响了校本免疫计划和疫苗接种率。研究设计2023 年 2 月至 8 月期间,对决策者、医疗保健提供者、教师、家长和青少年进行了半结构式访谈。方法访谈指南采用 COM-B 模型和理论领域框架。在演绎和归纳分析中,两名编码员将参与者的引语与相关模型组件和领域进行了映射。结果参与者(n = 39)确定了五个主题:1)SBIP 实施的推动因素;2)SBIP 实施的障碍;3)SBIP 实施的预期变化;4)学生焦虑;5)自 COVID-19 大流行以来的疫苗接种观点和变化。公共卫生措施为诊所提供了更多空间,同时也减少了学生人数。学校教职员工与医疗保健提供者之间的关系可能会帮助或阻碍项目的开展,尤其是在大流行期间,这两种职业的人员流动率都很高。青少年在疫苗接种决策中处于被动地位,母亲往往是唯一的决策者。自大流行以来,我们没有发现对常规疫苗的犹豫态度有任何变化。结论我们发现了 SBIP 所面临的一系列障碍和有利因素,其中许多因大流行而加剧。需要努力确保 SBIP 和补种计划继续面向所有青少年,以便他们在毕业前补种错过的疫苗。家长和青少年对疫苗接种的看法表明,大流行后疫苗接种覆盖率的变化可能是由于服务的可及性而非疫苗接种的犹豫不决。未来的研究需要让青少年参与疫苗接种决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stakeholders’ experiences with school-based immunization programs during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Canadian Maritimes: A qualitative study

Background

School-based immunization programs (SBIP) support access to routine vaccines for adolescents. Across Canada, the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent public health measures affected SBIP and vaccine uptake. The objectives of this study were to explore 1.) stakeholders' experiences with SBIP and changes to programs during COVID-19 in Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island and New Brunswick, and 2.) how the pandemic affected parents' and adolescents’ vaccine views.

Study design

Semi-structured interviews with decision makers, healthcare providers, teachers, parents and adolescents between February–August 2023.

Methods

The COM-B model and Theoretical Domains Framework informed interview guides. Deductive and inductive analyses saw participant quotes mapped to relevant model components and domains by two coders. Belief statements were generated within each stakeholder group then compared to identify themes and subthemes.

Results

Participants (n = 39) identified five themes: 1) enablers to SBIP delivery, 2) barriers to SBIP delivery, 3) desired changes to SBIP delivery, 4) student anxiety, and 5) vaccination views and changes since the COVID-19 pandemic. Public health measures facilitated more space for clinics, as did taking smaller cohorts of students. School staff-healthcare provider relationships could help or hinder programs, particularly with high turnover in both professions during the pandemic. Adolescents played a passive role in vaccine decision making, with mothers often being the sole decision maker. We did not identify any changes in hesitancy towards routine vaccines since the pandemic.

Conclusions

We identified a range of barriers and enablers to SBIP, many of which were exacerbated by the pandemic. Efforts are needed to ensure SBIP and catch-up programming remains accessible for all adolescents to catch-up on missed vaccines before graduation. Parents and adolescents’ vaccination views suggest changes in vaccine coverage since the pandemic may be due to accessibility of services rather than vaccine hesitancy. Future research is needed to engage adolescents in their vaccine decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health in Practice
Public Health in Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
117
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信