Joseph H Blommel, Matthew M Roforth, Calvin R Jerde, Carley A Karsten, Amber R Bridgeman, Jesse S Voss, Luigi Boccuto, Diana S Ivankovic, Sara M Sarasua, Benjamin R Kipp, Stephen J Murphy
{"title":"评估用户体验和自采集设备的 DNA 产量。","authors":"Joseph H Blommel, Matthew M Roforth, Calvin R Jerde, Carley A Karsten, Amber R Bridgeman, Jesse S Voss, Luigi Boccuto, Diana S Ivankovic, Sara M Sarasua, Benjamin R Kipp, Stephen J Murphy","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfae030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic emphasized an urgent need for devices used in the self-collection of biospecimens in an evolving patient care system. The mailing of biospecimen self-collection kits to patients, with samples returned via mail, provides a more convenient testing regimen, but could also impart patient sampling variabilities. User compliance with device directions is central to downstream testing of collected biospecimens and clear instructions are central to this goal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Here, we performed an evaluation of 10 oral DNA collection devices involving either swab or saliva self-collection and analyzed ease of use and comfort level with a device, as well as DNA recovery quantity/quality and sample stability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We show that while these DNA quality/quantity metrics are comparable between devices, users prefer direct saliva collection over swab-based devices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This information is useful in guiding future experiments including their use in human RNA, microbial, or viral sample collection/recovery and their use in clinical testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating User Experience and DNA Yield from Self-Collection Devices.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph H Blommel, Matthew M Roforth, Calvin R Jerde, Carley A Karsten, Amber R Bridgeman, Jesse S Voss, Luigi Boccuto, Diana S Ivankovic, Sara M Sarasua, Benjamin R Kipp, Stephen J Murphy\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jalm/jfae030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic emphasized an urgent need for devices used in the self-collection of biospecimens in an evolving patient care system. The mailing of biospecimen self-collection kits to patients, with samples returned via mail, provides a more convenient testing regimen, but could also impart patient sampling variabilities. User compliance with device directions is central to downstream testing of collected biospecimens and clear instructions are central to this goal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Here, we performed an evaluation of 10 oral DNA collection devices involving either swab or saliva self-collection and analyzed ease of use and comfort level with a device, as well as DNA recovery quantity/quality and sample stability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We show that while these DNA quality/quantity metrics are comparable between devices, users prefer direct saliva collection over swab-based devices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This information is useful in guiding future experiments including their use in human RNA, microbial, or viral sample collection/recovery and their use in clinical testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:COVID-19 大流行突显了在不断发展的病人护理系统中对用于自我采集生物样本的设备的迫切需求。向患者邮寄生物样本自助采集包,并通过邮件将样本寄回,提供了一种更方便的检测方案,但也可能造成患者采样差异。方法:在此,我们对 10 种涉及拭子或唾液自采集的口腔 DNA 采集设备进行了评估,并分析了设备的易用性和舒适度,以及 DNA 回收数量/质量和样本稳定性:结果:我们发现,虽然不同设备的 DNA 质量/数量指标相当,但用户更喜欢直接采集唾液,而不是基于拭子的设备:这些信息有助于指导未来的实验,包括用于人类 RNA、微生物或病毒样本的采集/回收,以及用于临床测试。
Evaluating User Experience and DNA Yield from Self-Collection Devices.
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic emphasized an urgent need for devices used in the self-collection of biospecimens in an evolving patient care system. The mailing of biospecimen self-collection kits to patients, with samples returned via mail, provides a more convenient testing regimen, but could also impart patient sampling variabilities. User compliance with device directions is central to downstream testing of collected biospecimens and clear instructions are central to this goal.
Methods: Here, we performed an evaluation of 10 oral DNA collection devices involving either swab or saliva self-collection and analyzed ease of use and comfort level with a device, as well as DNA recovery quantity/quality and sample stability.
Results: We show that while these DNA quality/quantity metrics are comparable between devices, users prefer direct saliva collection over swab-based devices.
Conclusions: This information is useful in guiding future experiments including their use in human RNA, microbial, or viral sample collection/recovery and their use in clinical testing.