Marc-Frederic Pastor, Dennis Nebel, Annika Degering, Tomas Smith, Roman Karkosch, Hauke Horstmann, Alexander Ellwein
{"title":"肩峰 III 型骨折单板与双板骨合成术的生物力学比较。","authors":"Marc-Frederic Pastor, Dennis Nebel, Annika Degering, Tomas Smith, Roman Karkosch, Hauke Horstmann, Alexander Ellwein","doi":"10.52965/001c.88396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One of complications of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty is acromion fractures, and its therapy is controversial. The aim of the study was to investigate the double-plate osteosynthesis for these fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An acromion type III fracture according to classification of Levy was simulated in 16 human shoulder cadavers, and the specimens were randomly divided into two groups. Single-plate osteosynthesis was performed in the first group (locking compression plate) and double-plate osteosynthesis (locking compression plate and one-third tubular locking plate) in the second group. Biomechanical testing included cycling load and load at failure on a material testing machine. During the test, the translation was measured using an optical tracking system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The load at failure for the single-plate osteosynthesis was 167 N and for the double-osteosynthesis 233.7 N (<i>P</i> = 0.328). The average translation was 11.1 mm for the single-plate osteosynthesis and 16.4 mm for the double-plate osteosynthesis (<i>P</i> = 0.753). The resulting stiffness resulted in 74.7 N/mm for the single-plate osteosynthesis and 327.9 N/mm for the double-plate osteosynthesis (<i>P</i> = 0.141).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Results of the biomechanical study showed that double-plate osteosynthesis had biomechanical properties similar to those of single-plate osteosynthesis for an acromion type III fracture at time point zero. The missing advantages of double-plate osteosynthesis can be explained by the choice of plate configuration.</p>","PeriodicalId":19669,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Reviews","volume":"16 ","pages":"88396"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10770366/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical comparison of single versus double plate osteosynthesis in acromion type III fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Marc-Frederic Pastor, Dennis Nebel, Annika Degering, Tomas Smith, Roman Karkosch, Hauke Horstmann, Alexander Ellwein\",\"doi\":\"10.52965/001c.88396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One of complications of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty is acromion fractures, and its therapy is controversial. The aim of the study was to investigate the double-plate osteosynthesis for these fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An acromion type III fracture according to classification of Levy was simulated in 16 human shoulder cadavers, and the specimens were randomly divided into two groups. Single-plate osteosynthesis was performed in the first group (locking compression plate) and double-plate osteosynthesis (locking compression plate and one-third tubular locking plate) in the second group. Biomechanical testing included cycling load and load at failure on a material testing machine. During the test, the translation was measured using an optical tracking system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The load at failure for the single-plate osteosynthesis was 167 N and for the double-osteosynthesis 233.7 N (<i>P</i> = 0.328). The average translation was 11.1 mm for the single-plate osteosynthesis and 16.4 mm for the double-plate osteosynthesis (<i>P</i> = 0.753). The resulting stiffness resulted in 74.7 N/mm for the single-plate osteosynthesis and 327.9 N/mm for the double-plate osteosynthesis (<i>P</i> = 0.141).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Results of the biomechanical study showed that double-plate osteosynthesis had biomechanical properties similar to those of single-plate osteosynthesis for an acromion type III fracture at time point zero. The missing advantages of double-plate osteosynthesis can be explained by the choice of plate configuration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopedic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"88396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10770366/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopedic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.88396\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.88396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Biomechanical comparison of single versus double plate osteosynthesis in acromion type III fractures.
Background: One of complications of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty is acromion fractures, and its therapy is controversial. The aim of the study was to investigate the double-plate osteosynthesis for these fractures.
Methods: An acromion type III fracture according to classification of Levy was simulated in 16 human shoulder cadavers, and the specimens were randomly divided into two groups. Single-plate osteosynthesis was performed in the first group (locking compression plate) and double-plate osteosynthesis (locking compression plate and one-third tubular locking plate) in the second group. Biomechanical testing included cycling load and load at failure on a material testing machine. During the test, the translation was measured using an optical tracking system.
Results: The load at failure for the single-plate osteosynthesis was 167 N and for the double-osteosynthesis 233.7 N (P = 0.328). The average translation was 11.1 mm for the single-plate osteosynthesis and 16.4 mm for the double-plate osteosynthesis (P = 0.753). The resulting stiffness resulted in 74.7 N/mm for the single-plate osteosynthesis and 327.9 N/mm for the double-plate osteosynthesis (P = 0.141).
Discussion: Results of the biomechanical study showed that double-plate osteosynthesis had biomechanical properties similar to those of single-plate osteosynthesis for an acromion type III fracture at time point zero. The missing advantages of double-plate osteosynthesis can be explained by the choice of plate configuration.
期刊介绍:
Orthopedic Reviews is an Open Access, online-only, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles concerned with any aspect of orthopedics, as well as diagnosis and treatment, trauma, surgical procedures, arthroscopy, sports medicine, rehabilitation, pediatric and geriatric orthopedics. All bone-related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology papers are also welcome. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, reviews and case reports of general interest.