测量动脉血气 SpO2 饱和度时防止感染的创新方法。

IF 1.7 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
GMS Hygiene and Infection Control Pub Date : 2024-04-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3205/dgkh000473
Seda Şahan, Sevil Güler, Eliz Geçtan, Hakan Aygün
{"title":"测量动脉血气 SpO2 饱和度时防止感染的创新方法。","authors":"Seda Şahan, Sevil Güler, Eliz Geçtan, Hakan Aygün","doi":"10.3205/dgkh000473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients are hospitalized for extended periods, particularly in intensive care units (ICUs). As a result, the saturation probe (pulse oximeter) remains attached for an extended period and microorganisms can grow in the wet environment. If the pulse oximeters are not reprocessed, cross-infection may occur. The literature contains several studies in which gloves were used for the measurement while various SpO<sub>2</sub> (peripheral arterial oxygen saturation) measurements were compared with each other. However, such comparisons have yet to be made with the results of arterial blood gas SpO<sub>2</sub> measurements by pulse oximeter, considered as the gold standard. The present study aimed to compare arterial blood gas values with the fingertip saturation measurement performed by having adult patients wear gloves of different colors, one after the other, on their fingers and determining the effect of the differently colored gloves (transparent, white, black, light blue) on saturation values.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted on 54 patients in an ICU. Intra-arterial blood gas SpO<sub>2</sub> results were measured. Oxygen saturation was measured while the patient 1. did not wear gloves and 2. sequentially wore a series of gloves of different colors. Paired t-test, correlation analysis, and Bland Altman charts were used to evaluate the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean SpO<sub>2</sub>% value of the participants' intra-arterial blood gas measurements was 97.76±2.04. The mean SpO<sub>2</sub>% value obtained from the measurements of the fingers with a transparent glove was 0.43 points lower than the mean SpO<sub>2</sub>% value of the intra-arterial blood gas measurements (t=0.986, p=0.61). The mean SpO<sub>2</sub>% value obtained from the measurements of the fingers with a white glove was 0.93 points lower than the mean SpO<sub>2</sub>% value of the intra-arterial blood gas measurements (t=1.157, p=0.093).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Of the measurements performed with a glove, the mean SpO<sub>2</sub>% value obtained from the measurements of the fingers with a transparent glove was more consistent with the mean SpO<sub>2</sub>% value of the intra-arterial blood gas measurements than measurement of the fingers without a glove.</p>","PeriodicalId":12738,"journal":{"name":"GMS Hygiene and Infection Control","volume":"19 ","pages":"Doc18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11099354/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An innovative method to prevent infection when measuring the arterial blood gas SpO2 saturation.\",\"authors\":\"Seda Şahan, Sevil Güler, Eliz Geçtan, Hakan Aygün\",\"doi\":\"10.3205/dgkh000473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients are hospitalized for extended periods, particularly in intensive care units (ICUs). As a result, the saturation probe (pulse oximeter) remains attached for an extended period and microorganisms can grow in the wet environment. If the pulse oximeters are not reprocessed, cross-infection may occur. The literature contains several studies in which gloves were used for the measurement while various SpO<sub>2</sub> (peripheral arterial oxygen saturation) measurements were compared with each other. However, such comparisons have yet to be made with the results of arterial blood gas SpO<sub>2</sub> measurements by pulse oximeter, considered as the gold standard. The present study aimed to compare arterial blood gas values with the fingertip saturation measurement performed by having adult patients wear gloves of different colors, one after the other, on their fingers and determining the effect of the differently colored gloves (transparent, white, black, light blue) on saturation values.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted on 54 patients in an ICU. Intra-arterial blood gas SpO<sub>2</sub> results were measured. Oxygen saturation was measured while the patient 1. did not wear gloves and 2. sequentially wore a series of gloves of different colors. Paired t-test, correlation analysis, and Bland Altman charts were used to evaluate the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean SpO<sub>2</sub>% value of the participants' intra-arterial blood gas measurements was 97.76±2.04. The mean SpO<sub>2</sub>% value obtained from the measurements of the fingers with a transparent glove was 0.43 points lower than the mean SpO<sub>2</sub>% value of the intra-arterial blood gas measurements (t=0.986, p=0.61). The mean SpO<sub>2</sub>% value obtained from the measurements of the fingers with a white glove was 0.93 points lower than the mean SpO<sub>2</sub>% value of the intra-arterial blood gas measurements (t=1.157, p=0.093).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Of the measurements performed with a glove, the mean SpO<sub>2</sub>% value obtained from the measurements of the fingers with a transparent glove was more consistent with the mean SpO<sub>2</sub>% value of the intra-arterial blood gas measurements than measurement of the fingers without a glove.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12738,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GMS Hygiene and Infection Control\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"Doc18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11099354/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GMS Hygiene and Infection Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000473\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Hygiene and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:病人住院时间较长,尤其是在重症监护室(ICU)。因此,饱和度探头(脉搏氧饱和度计)会长时间保持连接,微生物会在潮湿的环境中生长。如果不对脉搏血氧仪进行再处理,可能会发生交叉感染。文献中有几项研究使用手套进行测量,同时对各种 SpO2(外周动脉血氧饱和度)测量值进行了比较。然而,这种比较尚未与被视为金标准的脉搏血氧仪动脉血气 SpO2 测量结果进行过比较。本研究旨在将动脉血气值与指尖饱和度测量结果进行比较,方法是让成年患者在手指上依次戴上不同颜色的手套,并确定不同颜色手套(透明、白色、黑色、浅蓝色)对饱和度值的影响:研究对象为重症监护室的 54 名患者。测量动脉内血气 SpO2 结果。氧饱和度是在患者 1. 不戴手套和 2. 依次戴上一系列不同颜色手套的情况下测量的。采用配对 t 检验、相关性分析和布兰德-阿尔特曼图对结果进行评估:结果:参与者动脉内血气测量的平均 SpO2% 值为 97.76±2.04。戴透明手套测量手指所得的 SpO2% 平均值比动脉内血气测量所得的 SpO2% 平均值低 0.43 个点(t=0.986,p=0.61)。戴白手套测量手指获得的 SpO2% 平均值比动脉内血气测量的 SpO2% 平均值低 0.93 个点(t=1.157,p=0.093):结论:在戴手套进行的测量中,戴透明手套测量手指获得的平均 SpO2% 值与动脉内血气测量的平均 SpO2% 值相比,不戴手套测量手指获得的平均 SpO2% 值更加一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An innovative method to prevent infection when measuring the arterial blood gas SpO2 saturation.

Background: Patients are hospitalized for extended periods, particularly in intensive care units (ICUs). As a result, the saturation probe (pulse oximeter) remains attached for an extended period and microorganisms can grow in the wet environment. If the pulse oximeters are not reprocessed, cross-infection may occur. The literature contains several studies in which gloves were used for the measurement while various SpO2 (peripheral arterial oxygen saturation) measurements were compared with each other. However, such comparisons have yet to be made with the results of arterial blood gas SpO2 measurements by pulse oximeter, considered as the gold standard. The present study aimed to compare arterial blood gas values with the fingertip saturation measurement performed by having adult patients wear gloves of different colors, one after the other, on their fingers and determining the effect of the differently colored gloves (transparent, white, black, light blue) on saturation values.

Methods: The study was conducted on 54 patients in an ICU. Intra-arterial blood gas SpO2 results were measured. Oxygen saturation was measured while the patient 1. did not wear gloves and 2. sequentially wore a series of gloves of different colors. Paired t-test, correlation analysis, and Bland Altman charts were used to evaluate the results.

Results: The mean SpO2% value of the participants' intra-arterial blood gas measurements was 97.76±2.04. The mean SpO2% value obtained from the measurements of the fingers with a transparent glove was 0.43 points lower than the mean SpO2% value of the intra-arterial blood gas measurements (t=0.986, p=0.61). The mean SpO2% value obtained from the measurements of the fingers with a white glove was 0.93 points lower than the mean SpO2% value of the intra-arterial blood gas measurements (t=1.157, p=0.093).

Conclusion: Of the measurements performed with a glove, the mean SpO2% value obtained from the measurements of the fingers with a transparent glove was more consistent with the mean SpO2% value of the intra-arterial blood gas measurements than measurement of the fingers without a glove.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
GMS Hygiene and Infection Control
GMS Hygiene and Infection Control PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信