儿科初级眼保健(PREPP)- II 研究:研究印度南部一家三级眼科医疗机构的六个主要视力中心治疗的儿科患者对服务的满意度以及不向转诊医院报告的障碍。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-20 DOI:10.4103/IJO.IJO_2471_23
Iva R Kalita, Veena Kannusamy, Fredrick Mouttapa, Harsh V Singh
{"title":"儿科初级眼保健(PREPP)- II 研究:研究印度南部一家三级眼科医疗机构的六个主要视力中心治疗的儿科患者对服务的满意度以及不向转诊医院报告的障碍。","authors":"Iva R Kalita, Veena Kannusamy, Fredrick Mouttapa, Harsh V Singh","doi":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_2471_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was conducted in continuation of Primary Eyecare in Paediatrics Population (PREPP-I) and was aimed to assess parents' satisfaction with pediatric-eye-care services across six vision centers (VCs) of a tertiary eye hospital in Southern India. The barriers among the parents for not attending the base hospital (BH) when referred from these VCs were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A standard-validated-satisfaction questionnaire (VSQ) was used to assess patient satisfaction. Responses were assessed on a 5-point Likert scale: 0 (very dissatisfied) to 4 (very satisfied) against each response. Responses were expressed as percentages with 0 (very dissatisfied) and 100% (very satisfied). Patients were referred with a form mentioning reasons for referral (urgent/non-urgent). All referrals were evaluated by the principal investigator. In case of failure to report, parents were enquired about the barrier based on the validated barrier questionnaire (VBQ) over a telephonic conversation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 250 patients of the PREPP-1 study were included in the satisfaction study. Different domains were evaluated using VSQ (accessibility of VC, waiting hours, financial aspects, spectacle dispensing service, and teleophthalmology). The overall satisfaction was 75%. The most common reason for dissatisfaction was the lack of meeting the ophthalmologist in person, followed by waiting time. 58 patients wanted to visit BH to consult a pediatric ophthalmologist in person (23%). For the barrier study, 14 out of 47 referrals did not report and were evaluated using VBQ (knowledge, physical, time, and financial barriers). The majority had a financial barrier (43%), followed by knowledge (28.6%) and time barrier (14%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PREPP-II demonstrated that 3/4 th of pediatric patients are happy to be treated at VC with teleophthalmology services. However, a significant percentage want to consult a specialist at BH. One-fourth of total referrals did not report to BH due to financial constraints and a lack of awareness of the child's condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":13329,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"1745-1749"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primary eyecare in paediatrics population (PREPP) - II study: Study of satisfaction of services and barrier for not reporting to the base hospital on referral among pediatric patients treated in six major vision centers of a tertiary eye care facility in Southern India.\",\"authors\":\"Iva R Kalita, Veena Kannusamy, Fredrick Mouttapa, Harsh V Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/IJO.IJO_2471_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was conducted in continuation of Primary Eyecare in Paediatrics Population (PREPP-I) and was aimed to assess parents' satisfaction with pediatric-eye-care services across six vision centers (VCs) of a tertiary eye hospital in Southern India. The barriers among the parents for not attending the base hospital (BH) when referred from these VCs were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A standard-validated-satisfaction questionnaire (VSQ) was used to assess patient satisfaction. Responses were assessed on a 5-point Likert scale: 0 (very dissatisfied) to 4 (very satisfied) against each response. Responses were expressed as percentages with 0 (very dissatisfied) and 100% (very satisfied). Patients were referred with a form mentioning reasons for referral (urgent/non-urgent). All referrals were evaluated by the principal investigator. In case of failure to report, parents were enquired about the barrier based on the validated barrier questionnaire (VBQ) over a telephonic conversation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 250 patients of the PREPP-1 study were included in the satisfaction study. Different domains were evaluated using VSQ (accessibility of VC, waiting hours, financial aspects, spectacle dispensing service, and teleophthalmology). The overall satisfaction was 75%. The most common reason for dissatisfaction was the lack of meeting the ophthalmologist in person, followed by waiting time. 58 patients wanted to visit BH to consult a pediatric ophthalmologist in person (23%). For the barrier study, 14 out of 47 referrals did not report and were evaluated using VBQ (knowledge, physical, time, and financial barriers). The majority had a financial barrier (43%), followed by knowledge (28.6%) and time barrier (14%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PREPP-II demonstrated that 3/4 th of pediatric patients are happy to be treated at VC with teleophthalmology services. However, a significant percentage want to consult a specialist at BH. One-fourth of total referrals did not report to BH due to financial constraints and a lack of awareness of the child's condition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1745-1749\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_2471_23\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_2471_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究是儿科初级眼保健项目(PREPP-I)的延续,旨在评估印度南部一家三级眼科医院的六个视力中心(VC)的家长对儿科眼保健服务的满意度。此外,还评估了由这些视力中心转诊的家长不前往基地医院(BH)就诊的障碍:方法:采用经标准验证的满意度问卷(VSQ)来评估患者的满意度。采用 5 点李克特量表进行评估:每项回答均采用 5 点李克特量表:0(非常不满意)至 4(非常满意)。回答以 0(非常不满意)和 100%(非常满意)的百分比表示。病人转诊时会附上一份表格,说明转诊原因(紧急/非紧急)。所有转诊均由首席研究员进行评估。如果没有报告,则通过电话交谈,根据有效障碍问卷(VBQ)向家长询问障碍情况:PREPP-1研究的所有250名患者都参与了满意度研究。使用 VSQ 对不同领域进行了评估(VC 的可及性、等待时间、经济方面、眼镜配发服务和远程眼科)。总体满意度为 75%。不满意的最常见原因是无法亲自见到眼科医生,其次是等待时间。有 58 名患者希望亲自到波士顿卫生局咨询儿科眼科医生(23%)。在障碍研究中,47 名转诊者中有 14 人没有报告,我们使用 VBQ(知识、身体、时间和经济障碍)对其进行了评估。大多数人存在经济障碍(43%),其次是知识障碍(28.6%)和时间障碍(14%):PREPP-II表明,四分之三的儿科患者乐意在有远程眼科服务的越洋医疗中心接受治疗。然而,也有相当大比例的患者希望在 BH 向专科医生咨询。在所有转诊患者中,有四分之一的患者因经济拮据和对孩子的病情缺乏了解而未向 BH 报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Primary eyecare in paediatrics population (PREPP) - II study: Study of satisfaction of services and barrier for not reporting to the base hospital on referral among pediatric patients treated in six major vision centers of a tertiary eye care facility in Southern India.

Purpose: This study was conducted in continuation of Primary Eyecare in Paediatrics Population (PREPP-I) and was aimed to assess parents' satisfaction with pediatric-eye-care services across six vision centers (VCs) of a tertiary eye hospital in Southern India. The barriers among the parents for not attending the base hospital (BH) when referred from these VCs were also evaluated.

Methods: A standard-validated-satisfaction questionnaire (VSQ) was used to assess patient satisfaction. Responses were assessed on a 5-point Likert scale: 0 (very dissatisfied) to 4 (very satisfied) against each response. Responses were expressed as percentages with 0 (very dissatisfied) and 100% (very satisfied). Patients were referred with a form mentioning reasons for referral (urgent/non-urgent). All referrals were evaluated by the principal investigator. In case of failure to report, parents were enquired about the barrier based on the validated barrier questionnaire (VBQ) over a telephonic conversation.

Results: All 250 patients of the PREPP-1 study were included in the satisfaction study. Different domains were evaluated using VSQ (accessibility of VC, waiting hours, financial aspects, spectacle dispensing service, and teleophthalmology). The overall satisfaction was 75%. The most common reason for dissatisfaction was the lack of meeting the ophthalmologist in person, followed by waiting time. 58 patients wanted to visit BH to consult a pediatric ophthalmologist in person (23%). For the barrier study, 14 out of 47 referrals did not report and were evaluated using VBQ (knowledge, physical, time, and financial barriers). The majority had a financial barrier (43%), followed by knowledge (28.6%) and time barrier (14%).

Conclusion: PREPP-II demonstrated that 3/4 th of pediatric patients are happy to be treated at VC with teleophthalmology services. However, a significant percentage want to consult a specialist at BH. One-fourth of total referrals did not report to BH due to financial constraints and a lack of awareness of the child's condition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.40%
发文量
1963
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Ophthalmology covers clinical, experimental, basic science research and translational research studies related to medical, ethical and social issues in field of ophthalmology and vision science. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信