利用手机应用软件预防痴呆症(PRODEMOS):一项多国随机对照有效性实施试验。

IF 13.4 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Prof Eric P Moll van Charante MD , Marieke P Hoevenaar-Blom PhD , Manshu Song PhD , Prof Sandrine Andrieu MD , Linda Barnes RGN , Cindy Birck PhD , Rachael Brooks BA , Nicola Coley PhD , Esmé Eggink PhD , Jean Georges PhD , Melanie Hafdi PhD , Prof Willem A van Gool MD , Ron Handels PhD , Haifeng Hou PhD , Prof Jihui Lyu MD , Prof Yixuan Niu MD , Libin Song BSc , Prof Wenzhi Wang PhD , Prof Youxin Wang PhD , Anders Wimo PhD , Xi Wei
{"title":"利用手机应用软件预防痴呆症(PRODEMOS):一项多国随机对照有效性实施试验。","authors":"Prof Eric P Moll van Charante MD ,&nbsp;Marieke P Hoevenaar-Blom PhD ,&nbsp;Manshu Song PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Sandrine Andrieu MD ,&nbsp;Linda Barnes RGN ,&nbsp;Cindy Birck PhD ,&nbsp;Rachael Brooks BA ,&nbsp;Nicola Coley PhD ,&nbsp;Esmé Eggink PhD ,&nbsp;Jean Georges PhD ,&nbsp;Melanie Hafdi PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Willem A van Gool MD ,&nbsp;Ron Handels PhD ,&nbsp;Haifeng Hou PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Jihui Lyu MD ,&nbsp;Prof Yixuan Niu MD ,&nbsp;Libin Song BSc ,&nbsp;Prof Wenzhi Wang PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Youxin Wang PhD ,&nbsp;Anders Wimo PhD ,&nbsp;Xi Wei","doi":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00068-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The expected increase of dementia prevalence in the coming decades will mainly be in low-income and middle-income countries and in people with low socioeconomic status in high-income countries. This study aims to reduce dementia risk factors in underserved populations at high-risk using a coach-supported mobile health (mHealth) intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This open-label, blinded endpoint, hybrid effectiveness–implementation randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigated whether a coach-supported mHealth intervention can reduce dementia risk in people aged 55–75 years of low socioeconomic status in the UK or from the general population in China with at least two dementia risk factors. The primary effectiveness outcome was change in cardiovascular risk factors, ageing, and incidence of dementia (CAIDE) risk score from baseline to after 12–18 months of intervention. Implementation outcomes were coverage, adoption, sustainability, appropriateness, acceptability, fidelity, feasibility, and costs assessed using a mixed-methods approach. All participants with complete data on the primary outcome, without imputation of missing outcomes were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat principle). This trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN15986016, and is completed.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Between Jan 15, 2021, and April 18, 2023, 1488 people (601 male and 887 female) were randomly assigned (734 to intervention and 754 to control), with 1229 (83%) of 1488 available for analysis of the primary effectiveness outcome. After a mean follow-up of 16 months (SD 2·5), the mean CAIDE score improved 0·16 points in the intervention group versus 0·01 in the control group (mean difference –0·16, 95% CI –0·29 to –0·03). 1533 (10%) invited individuals responded; of the intervention participants, 593 (81%) of 734 adopted the intervention and 367 (50%) of 734 continued active participation throughout the study. Perceived appropriateness (85%), acceptability (81%), and fidelity (79%) were good, with fair overall feasibility (53% of intervention participants and 58% of coaches), at low cost. No differences in adverse events between study arms were found.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>A coach-supported mHealth intervention is modestly effective in reducing dementia risk factors in those with low socioeconomic status in the UK and any socioeconomic status in China. Implementation is challenging in these populations, but those reached actively participated. Whether this intervention will result in less cognitive decline and dementia requires a larger RCT with long follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>EU Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme and the National Key R&amp;D Programmes of China.</p></div><div><h3>Translation</h3><p>For the Mandarin translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"5 6","pages":"Pages e431-e442"},"PeriodicalIF":13.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824000680/pdfft?md5=347ab4be77fe24ccc214ac7df12a2777&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756824000680-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevention of dementia using mobile phone applications (PRODEMOS): a multinational, randomised, controlled effectiveness–implementation trial\",\"authors\":\"Prof Eric P Moll van Charante MD ,&nbsp;Marieke P Hoevenaar-Blom PhD ,&nbsp;Manshu Song PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Sandrine Andrieu MD ,&nbsp;Linda Barnes RGN ,&nbsp;Cindy Birck PhD ,&nbsp;Rachael Brooks BA ,&nbsp;Nicola Coley PhD ,&nbsp;Esmé Eggink PhD ,&nbsp;Jean Georges PhD ,&nbsp;Melanie Hafdi PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Willem A van Gool MD ,&nbsp;Ron Handels PhD ,&nbsp;Haifeng Hou PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Jihui Lyu MD ,&nbsp;Prof Yixuan Niu MD ,&nbsp;Libin Song BSc ,&nbsp;Prof Wenzhi Wang PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Youxin Wang PhD ,&nbsp;Anders Wimo PhD ,&nbsp;Xi Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00068-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The expected increase of dementia prevalence in the coming decades will mainly be in low-income and middle-income countries and in people with low socioeconomic status in high-income countries. This study aims to reduce dementia risk factors in underserved populations at high-risk using a coach-supported mobile health (mHealth) intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This open-label, blinded endpoint, hybrid effectiveness–implementation randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigated whether a coach-supported mHealth intervention can reduce dementia risk in people aged 55–75 years of low socioeconomic status in the UK or from the general population in China with at least two dementia risk factors. The primary effectiveness outcome was change in cardiovascular risk factors, ageing, and incidence of dementia (CAIDE) risk score from baseline to after 12–18 months of intervention. Implementation outcomes were coverage, adoption, sustainability, appropriateness, acceptability, fidelity, feasibility, and costs assessed using a mixed-methods approach. All participants with complete data on the primary outcome, without imputation of missing outcomes were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat principle). This trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN15986016, and is completed.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Between Jan 15, 2021, and April 18, 2023, 1488 people (601 male and 887 female) were randomly assigned (734 to intervention and 754 to control), with 1229 (83%) of 1488 available for analysis of the primary effectiveness outcome. After a mean follow-up of 16 months (SD 2·5), the mean CAIDE score improved 0·16 points in the intervention group versus 0·01 in the control group (mean difference –0·16, 95% CI –0·29 to –0·03). 1533 (10%) invited individuals responded; of the intervention participants, 593 (81%) of 734 adopted the intervention and 367 (50%) of 734 continued active participation throughout the study. Perceived appropriateness (85%), acceptability (81%), and fidelity (79%) were good, with fair overall feasibility (53% of intervention participants and 58% of coaches), at low cost. No differences in adverse events between study arms were found.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>A coach-supported mHealth intervention is modestly effective in reducing dementia risk factors in those with low socioeconomic status in the UK and any socioeconomic status in China. Implementation is challenging in these populations, but those reached actively participated. Whether this intervention will result in less cognitive decline and dementia requires a larger RCT with long follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>EU Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme and the National Key R&amp;D Programmes of China.</p></div><div><h3>Translation</h3><p>For the Mandarin translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Healthy Longevity\",\"volume\":\"5 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages e431-e442\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824000680/pdfft?md5=347ab4be77fe24ccc214ac7df12a2777&pid=1-s2.0-S2666756824000680-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Healthy Longevity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824000680\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666756824000680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:预计未来几十年痴呆症患病率的增长将主要出现在低收入和中等收入国家,以及高收入国家中社会经济地位较低的人群中。本研究旨在利用教练支持的移动医疗(mHealth)干预措施,减少服务不足的高危人群中的痴呆症风险因素:这项开放标签、终点盲法、效果-实施混合随机对照试验(RCT)调查了由教练支持的移动医疗干预能否降低英国 55-75 岁社会经济地位低下人群或中国普通人群中至少有两种痴呆风险因素的痴呆风险。主要有效性结果是心血管风险因素、老龄化和痴呆症发病率(CAIDE)风险评分从基线到干预 12-18 个月后的变化。实施结果包括覆盖率、采用率、可持续性、适宜性、可接受性、忠实性、可行性和成本,采用混合方法进行评估。所有拥有主要结果完整数据的参与者均被纳入分析(意向治疗原则),未对缺失结果进行估算。该试验已在 ISRCTN(ISRCTN15986016)上注册,并已完成:2021年1月15日至2023年4月18日期间,1488人(601名男性和887名女性)被随机分配(734人接受干预,754人接受对照),1488人中有1229人(83%)可用于主要疗效分析。经过平均 16 个月的随访(SD 2-5),干预组的 CAIDE 平均得分提高了 0-16 分,而对照组的 CAIDE 平均得分提高了 0-01 分(平均差异 -0-16,95% CI -0-29~-0-03)。1533(10%)名受邀者做出了回应;在干预参与者中,734 人中有 593(81%)人采取了干预措施,734 人中有 367(50%)人在整个研究期间继续积极参与。干预的适宜性(85%)、可接受性(81%)和忠实性(79%)均较好,总体可行性尚可(53%的干预参与者和 58% 的教练),成本较低。各研究臂之间的不良事件没有差异:在英国,由教练支持的移动医疗干预对降低社会经济地位较低人群和中国任何社会经济地位人群的痴呆症风险因素效果一般。在这些人群中实施具有挑战性,但受众积极参与。这项干预措施能否减少认知能力下降和痴呆症的发生,还需要进行更大规模的RCT研究和长期随访:资金来源:欧盟 "地平线2020 "研究与创新计划和中国国家重点研发计划:摘要的普通话翻译见补充材料部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevention of dementia using mobile phone applications (PRODEMOS): a multinational, randomised, controlled effectiveness–implementation trial

Background

The expected increase of dementia prevalence in the coming decades will mainly be in low-income and middle-income countries and in people with low socioeconomic status in high-income countries. This study aims to reduce dementia risk factors in underserved populations at high-risk using a coach-supported mobile health (mHealth) intervention.

Methods

This open-label, blinded endpoint, hybrid effectiveness–implementation randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigated whether a coach-supported mHealth intervention can reduce dementia risk in people aged 55–75 years of low socioeconomic status in the UK or from the general population in China with at least two dementia risk factors. The primary effectiveness outcome was change in cardiovascular risk factors, ageing, and incidence of dementia (CAIDE) risk score from baseline to after 12–18 months of intervention. Implementation outcomes were coverage, adoption, sustainability, appropriateness, acceptability, fidelity, feasibility, and costs assessed using a mixed-methods approach. All participants with complete data on the primary outcome, without imputation of missing outcomes were included in the analysis (intention-to-treat principle). This trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN15986016, and is completed.

Findings

Between Jan 15, 2021, and April 18, 2023, 1488 people (601 male and 887 female) were randomly assigned (734 to intervention and 754 to control), with 1229 (83%) of 1488 available for analysis of the primary effectiveness outcome. After a mean follow-up of 16 months (SD 2·5), the mean CAIDE score improved 0·16 points in the intervention group versus 0·01 in the control group (mean difference –0·16, 95% CI –0·29 to –0·03). 1533 (10%) invited individuals responded; of the intervention participants, 593 (81%) of 734 adopted the intervention and 367 (50%) of 734 continued active participation throughout the study. Perceived appropriateness (85%), acceptability (81%), and fidelity (79%) were good, with fair overall feasibility (53% of intervention participants and 58% of coaches), at low cost. No differences in adverse events between study arms were found.

Interpretation

A coach-supported mHealth intervention is modestly effective in reducing dementia risk factors in those with low socioeconomic status in the UK and any socioeconomic status in China. Implementation is challenging in these populations, but those reached actively participated. Whether this intervention will result in less cognitive decline and dementia requires a larger RCT with long follow-up.

Funding

EU Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme and the National Key R&D Programmes of China.

Translation

For the Mandarin translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Healthy Longevity
Lancet Healthy Longevity GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
2.30%
发文量
192
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Healthy Longevity, a gold open-access journal, focuses on clinically-relevant longevity and healthy aging research. It covers early-stage clinical research on aging mechanisms, epidemiological studies, and societal research on changing populations. The journal includes clinical trials across disciplines, particularly in gerontology and age-specific clinical guidelines. In line with the Lancet family tradition, it advocates for the rights of all to healthy lives, emphasizing original research likely to impact clinical practice or thinking. Clinical and policy reviews also contribute to shaping the discourse in this rapidly growing discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信