饮食和生活方式因素的差异可部分解释前列腺癌死亡率中的种族差异

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
MO Sodipo, E Rencsok, RG Russo, SF Peisch, T Gerke, EL Giovannucci, KH Stopsack, LA Mucci
{"title":"饮食和生活方式因素的差异可部分解释前列腺癌死亡率中的种族差异","authors":"MO Sodipo, E Rencsok, RG Russo, SF Peisch, T Gerke, EL Giovannucci, KH Stopsack, LA Mucci","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-0374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Black individuals have 2.1 times higher prostate cancer mortality rates than White individuals in the United States. Several dietary and lifestyle factors may influence the risk of lethal prostate cancer. This study evaluated to what extent differences in the prevalence of these modifiable risk factors by race could explain racial disparities in prostate cancer mortality. Methods: We compared the prevalence of seven potentially modifiable risk factors for lethal prostate cancer among Black and White individuals, using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Study at two time points (1988–1994; 2017–2018). Relative risks for lethal prostate cancer were estimated in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. We calculated the population attributable fraction (PAF) for each factor by self-identified race, defined as the reduction in mortality that would be achieved if the population had been entirely unexposed, compared with the current exposure pattern. We also calculated the difference in the PAF between Black and White individuals, assuming causality of risk factors and no multiplicative effect measure modification by race. Results: Based on data from NHANES III (1988–1994), the largest prevalence differences between Black and White individuals were for vitamin D deficiency, current smoking, and coffee, respectively. Elimination of these risk factors among Black individuals could have led to a larger reduction in lethal prostate cancer in comparison to eliminating these same risk factors among White individuals. Given the prevalence of these risk factors in 2017–2018, current interventions on vitamin D deficiency, current smoking, and coffee could influence future PAF differences for lethal prostate cancer mortality among Black individuals compared to White individuals. Conclusions: Differences in the prevalence of some modifiable lifestyle and dietary factors are potentially responsible for a portion of the racial disparity in prostate cancer mortality.","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial Disparities in Prostate Cancer Mortality Rates Partially Explained By Differences in Dietary and Lifestyle Factors\",\"authors\":\"MO Sodipo, E Rencsok, RG Russo, SF Peisch, T Gerke, EL Giovannucci, KH Stopsack, LA Mucci\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-0374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Black individuals have 2.1 times higher prostate cancer mortality rates than White individuals in the United States. Several dietary and lifestyle factors may influence the risk of lethal prostate cancer. This study evaluated to what extent differences in the prevalence of these modifiable risk factors by race could explain racial disparities in prostate cancer mortality. Methods: We compared the prevalence of seven potentially modifiable risk factors for lethal prostate cancer among Black and White individuals, using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Study at two time points (1988–1994; 2017–2018). Relative risks for lethal prostate cancer were estimated in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. We calculated the population attributable fraction (PAF) for each factor by self-identified race, defined as the reduction in mortality that would be achieved if the population had been entirely unexposed, compared with the current exposure pattern. We also calculated the difference in the PAF between Black and White individuals, assuming causality of risk factors and no multiplicative effect measure modification by race. Results: Based on data from NHANES III (1988–1994), the largest prevalence differences between Black and White individuals were for vitamin D deficiency, current smoking, and coffee, respectively. Elimination of these risk factors among Black individuals could have led to a larger reduction in lethal prostate cancer in comparison to eliminating these same risk factors among White individuals. Given the prevalence of these risk factors in 2017–2018, current interventions on vitamin D deficiency, current smoking, and coffee could influence future PAF differences for lethal prostate cancer mortality among Black individuals compared to White individuals. Conclusions: Differences in the prevalence of some modifiable lifestyle and dietary factors are potentially responsible for a portion of the racial disparity in prostate cancer mortality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-0374\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-0374","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在美国,黑人的前列腺癌死亡率是白人的 2.1 倍。一些饮食和生活方式因素可能会影响前列腺癌的致死风险。本研究评估了这些可改变的风险因素在不同种族中的流行率差异能在多大程度上解释前列腺癌死亡率的种族差异。方法:我们利用两个时间点(1988-1994 年;2017-2018 年)的国家健康与营养调查研究,比较了黑人和白人中七种潜在的可改变的致命前列腺癌风险因素的流行率。健康专业人员随访研究估算了致命前列腺癌的相对风险。我们按自我认同的种族计算了每个因素的人口可归因分数(PAF),其定义为与当前暴露模式相比,如果人口完全未暴露,死亡率会降低多少。我们还计算了黑人和白人之间的 PAF 差异,假定风险因素之间存在因果关系,并且没有种族的乘法效应测量修正。结果:根据 NHANES III(1988-1994 年)的数据,黑人和白人之间发病率差异最大的因素分别是维生素 D 缺乏、当前吸烟和咖啡。与在白人中消除这些风险因素相比,在黑人中消除这些风险因素可能会使致命前列腺癌的发病率大幅下降。鉴于这些风险因素在 2017-2018 年的流行程度,目前对维生素 D 缺乏、目前吸烟和咖啡的干预措施可能会影响未来黑人致死性前列腺癌死亡率与白人致死性前列腺癌死亡率的 PAF 差异。结论:一些可改变的生活方式和饮食因素流行率的差异可能是造成前列腺癌死亡率种族差异的部分原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Racial Disparities in Prostate Cancer Mortality Rates Partially Explained By Differences in Dietary and Lifestyle Factors
Introduction: Black individuals have 2.1 times higher prostate cancer mortality rates than White individuals in the United States. Several dietary and lifestyle factors may influence the risk of lethal prostate cancer. This study evaluated to what extent differences in the prevalence of these modifiable risk factors by race could explain racial disparities in prostate cancer mortality. Methods: We compared the prevalence of seven potentially modifiable risk factors for lethal prostate cancer among Black and White individuals, using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Study at two time points (1988–1994; 2017–2018). Relative risks for lethal prostate cancer were estimated in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. We calculated the population attributable fraction (PAF) for each factor by self-identified race, defined as the reduction in mortality that would be achieved if the population had been entirely unexposed, compared with the current exposure pattern. We also calculated the difference in the PAF between Black and White individuals, assuming causality of risk factors and no multiplicative effect measure modification by race. Results: Based on data from NHANES III (1988–1994), the largest prevalence differences between Black and White individuals were for vitamin D deficiency, current smoking, and coffee, respectively. Elimination of these risk factors among Black individuals could have led to a larger reduction in lethal prostate cancer in comparison to eliminating these same risk factors among White individuals. Given the prevalence of these risk factors in 2017–2018, current interventions on vitamin D deficiency, current smoking, and coffee could influence future PAF differences for lethal prostate cancer mortality among Black individuals compared to White individuals. Conclusions: Differences in the prevalence of some modifiable lifestyle and dietary factors are potentially responsible for a portion of the racial disparity in prostate cancer mortality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
538
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信