弗吉尼亚州放牧草场和其他保护地使用下的土壤聚集和表层土壤特性

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Alan J. Franzluebbers
{"title":"弗吉尼亚州放牧草场和其他保护地使用下的土壤聚集和表层土壤特性","authors":"Alan J. Franzluebbers","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Grazed pastures supporting ruminant livestock have not been well characterized for soil health condition. However, growing interest in holistic management of compromised watersheds suggests that grazing lands deserve more attention for their capacity to provide ecosystem services. Relatively little is known about how grazing management affects soil aggregation and other surface-soil properties on private lands in the eastern United States. This study investigated the effects of land use (conventional-till cropland, no-till cropland, grassland, and woodland) and pasture management characteristics on soil aggregation, bulk density, sieved soil density, total soil N, and soil-test biological activity on 31 private farms distributed across the western half of Virginia. Soil stability index followed the order (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05): conventional-till cropland (0.60 mm mm<sup>−1</sup>) &lt; no-till cropland (0.78 mm mm<sup>−1</sup>) &lt; woodland (0.85 mm mm<sup>−1</sup>) = grassland (0.89 mm mm<sup>−1</sup>). Surface soil characteristics improved with pasture age due to organic matter recycling from residual forage mass and animal excreta. Increases in total soil N and soil-test biological activity helped create water-stable aggregation and reduce soil bulk density. Soil stability index was optimized with moderate stocking rate of 0.5–1.1 Mg live weight ha<sup>−1</sup>. Stocking method did not affect soil aggregation or bulk density. Soil stability index declined with increasing N fertilization rate. Soil aggregation characteristics were generally not affected by organic amendment, quantity of hay fed on farm, or occasional hay harvest from pastures, likely because aggregation was high across management variables. Well-managed grazed pastures in Virginia are creating desirable conservation agricultural land uses to protect watershed quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21588","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil aggregation and surface-soil properties under grazed pastures and other conservation land uses in Virginia\",\"authors\":\"Alan J. Franzluebbers\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agj2.21588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Grazed pastures supporting ruminant livestock have not been well characterized for soil health condition. However, growing interest in holistic management of compromised watersheds suggests that grazing lands deserve more attention for their capacity to provide ecosystem services. Relatively little is known about how grazing management affects soil aggregation and other surface-soil properties on private lands in the eastern United States. This study investigated the effects of land use (conventional-till cropland, no-till cropland, grassland, and woodland) and pasture management characteristics on soil aggregation, bulk density, sieved soil density, total soil N, and soil-test biological activity on 31 private farms distributed across the western half of Virginia. Soil stability index followed the order (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05): conventional-till cropland (0.60 mm mm<sup>−1</sup>) &lt; no-till cropland (0.78 mm mm<sup>−1</sup>) &lt; woodland (0.85 mm mm<sup>−1</sup>) = grassland (0.89 mm mm<sup>−1</sup>). Surface soil characteristics improved with pasture age due to organic matter recycling from residual forage mass and animal excreta. Increases in total soil N and soil-test biological activity helped create water-stable aggregation and reduce soil bulk density. Soil stability index was optimized with moderate stocking rate of 0.5–1.1 Mg live weight ha<sup>−1</sup>. Stocking method did not affect soil aggregation or bulk density. Soil stability index declined with increasing N fertilization rate. Soil aggregation characteristics were generally not affected by organic amendment, quantity of hay fed on farm, or occasional hay harvest from pastures, likely because aggregation was high across management variables. Well-managed grazed pastures in Virginia are creating desirable conservation agricultural land uses to protect watershed quality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21588\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21588\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21588","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

支持反刍家畜的放牧草场在土壤健康状况方面还没有很好的特征。然而,人们对受损流域整体管理的兴趣与日俱增,这表明放牧地提供生态系统服务的能力值得更多关注。关于放牧管理如何影响美国东部私人土地上的土壤团聚和其他表层土壤特性,人们知之甚少。本研究调查了弗吉尼亚州西半部 31 个私人农场的土地利用(传统耕作耕地、免耕耕地、草地和林地)和牧场管理特征对土壤团聚度、容重、筛分土壤密度、土壤总氮和土壤测试生物活性的影响。土壤稳定性指数依次为(p < 0.05):传统耕作耕地(0.60 mm mm-1)<;免耕耕地(0.78 mm mm-1)<;林地(0.85 mm mm-1)=草地(0.89 mm mm-1)。由于残余牧草和动物排泄物中的有机物循环,表层土壤特性随着牧龄的增加而改善。土壤总氮和土壤测试生物活性的增加有助于形成水稳团聚并降低土壤容重。土壤稳定指数在 0.5-1.1 兆克活重公顷-1 的适度放养率下达到最佳。放养方式对土壤团聚和容重没有影响。土壤稳定指数随着氮肥施用量的增加而下降。土壤团聚特征一般不受有机改良剂、农场饲喂干草量或偶尔从牧场收割干草的影响,这可能是因为不同管理变量的土壤团聚度都很高。弗吉尼亚州管理良好的放牧牧场正在创造理想的保护性农业用地,以保护流域质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Soil aggregation and surface-soil properties under grazed pastures and other conservation land uses in Virginia

Soil aggregation and surface-soil properties under grazed pastures and other conservation land uses in Virginia

Grazed pastures supporting ruminant livestock have not been well characterized for soil health condition. However, growing interest in holistic management of compromised watersheds suggests that grazing lands deserve more attention for their capacity to provide ecosystem services. Relatively little is known about how grazing management affects soil aggregation and other surface-soil properties on private lands in the eastern United States. This study investigated the effects of land use (conventional-till cropland, no-till cropland, grassland, and woodland) and pasture management characteristics on soil aggregation, bulk density, sieved soil density, total soil N, and soil-test biological activity on 31 private farms distributed across the western half of Virginia. Soil stability index followed the order (p < 0.05): conventional-till cropland (0.60 mm mm−1) < no-till cropland (0.78 mm mm−1) < woodland (0.85 mm mm−1) = grassland (0.89 mm mm−1). Surface soil characteristics improved with pasture age due to organic matter recycling from residual forage mass and animal excreta. Increases in total soil N and soil-test biological activity helped create water-stable aggregation and reduce soil bulk density. Soil stability index was optimized with moderate stocking rate of 0.5–1.1 Mg live weight ha−1. Stocking method did not affect soil aggregation or bulk density. Soil stability index declined with increasing N fertilization rate. Soil aggregation characteristics were generally not affected by organic amendment, quantity of hay fed on farm, or occasional hay harvest from pastures, likely because aggregation was high across management variables. Well-managed grazed pastures in Virginia are creating desirable conservation agricultural land uses to protect watershed quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信