空间均衡抽样中的方差估计

IF 1.4 4区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Hossein Veisipour, Mohammad Moradi, Jennifer Brown
{"title":"空间均衡抽样中的方差估计","authors":"Hossein Veisipour,&nbsp;Mohammad Moradi,&nbsp;Jennifer Brown","doi":"10.1007/s40995-024-01617-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In spatially balanced sampling designs, joint inclusion probabilities for neighborhood units are often zero, or near to zero, because the sampling units tend to be spread across the sample space. In these cases it is difficult to use conventional estimators for the population variance. Alternative estimators, such as the neighborhood-based variance estimators have been introduced. The neighborhood-based variance estimator is recommended for use with Generalized Random Tessellation Stratified designs. In this paper, we review some of the currently available estimators, and introduce others, for use with spatially balanced sampling designs. In a simulation study, the efficiency of the introduced estimators are compared with different estimators under six spatially sampling designs (Balanced Acceptance Sampling, Halton Iterative Partitioning, Generalized Random Tessellation Stratified design, Spatially Correlated Poisson Sampling) and two local pivotal methods. In our simulation study the introduced estimators were more efficient than conventional ones.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":600,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions A: Science","volume":"48 4","pages":"1005 - 1017"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variance Estimation in Spatially Balanced Sampling\",\"authors\":\"Hossein Veisipour,&nbsp;Mohammad Moradi,&nbsp;Jennifer Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40995-024-01617-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In spatially balanced sampling designs, joint inclusion probabilities for neighborhood units are often zero, or near to zero, because the sampling units tend to be spread across the sample space. In these cases it is difficult to use conventional estimators for the population variance. Alternative estimators, such as the neighborhood-based variance estimators have been introduced. The neighborhood-based variance estimator is recommended for use with Generalized Random Tessellation Stratified designs. In this paper, we review some of the currently available estimators, and introduce others, for use with spatially balanced sampling designs. In a simulation study, the efficiency of the introduced estimators are compared with different estimators under six spatially sampling designs (Balanced Acceptance Sampling, Halton Iterative Partitioning, Generalized Random Tessellation Stratified design, Spatially Correlated Poisson Sampling) and two local pivotal methods. In our simulation study the introduced estimators were more efficient than conventional ones.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions A: Science\",\"volume\":\"48 4\",\"pages\":\"1005 - 1017\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions A: Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"4\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40995-024-01617-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions A: Science","FirstCategoryId":"4","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40995-024-01617-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在空间均衡抽样设计中,邻近单元的联合包含概率通常为零或接近零,因为抽样单元往往分布在整个抽样空间。在这种情况下,很难使用传统的人口方差估计方法。人们引入了替代估计器,如基于邻域的方差估计器。基于邻域的方差估计器推荐用于广义随机网格分层设计。在本文中,我们回顾了目前可用的一些估计器,并介绍了用于空间均衡抽样设计的其他估计器。在一项模拟研究中,我们将引入的估计器与六种空间抽样设计(平衡接受抽样、Halton 迭代分区、广义随机细分分层设计、空间相关泊松抽样)和两种局部枢轴法下的不同估计器的效率进行了比较。在我们的模拟研究中,引入的估计器比传统估计器更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Variance Estimation in Spatially Balanced Sampling

Variance Estimation in Spatially Balanced Sampling

In spatially balanced sampling designs, joint inclusion probabilities for neighborhood units are often zero, or near to zero, because the sampling units tend to be spread across the sample space. In these cases it is difficult to use conventional estimators for the population variance. Alternative estimators, such as the neighborhood-based variance estimators have been introduced. The neighborhood-based variance estimator is recommended for use with Generalized Random Tessellation Stratified designs. In this paper, we review some of the currently available estimators, and introduce others, for use with spatially balanced sampling designs. In a simulation study, the efficiency of the introduced estimators are compared with different estimators under six spatially sampling designs (Balanced Acceptance Sampling, Halton Iterative Partitioning, Generalized Random Tessellation Stratified design, Spatially Correlated Poisson Sampling) and two local pivotal methods. In our simulation study the introduced estimators were more efficient than conventional ones.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
122
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of this journal is to foster the growth of scientific research among Iranian scientists and to provide a medium which brings the fruits of their research to the attention of the world’s scientific community. The journal publishes original research findings – which may be theoretical, experimental or both - reviews, techniques, and comments spanning all subjects in the field of basic sciences, including Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics, Statistics, Biology and Earth Sciences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信