加利福尼亚近海风力发电场空间规划,调解对渔业和野生动物保护的影响

IF 4.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Crow White , Yi-Hi Wang , Ryan K. Walter , Benjamin I. Ruttenberg , Danny Han , Eli Newman , Ethan R. Deyle , Sucharita Gopal , Les Kaufman
{"title":"加利福尼亚近海风力发电场空间规划,调解对渔业和野生动物保护的影响","authors":"Crow White ,&nbsp;Yi-Hi Wang ,&nbsp;Ryan K. Walter ,&nbsp;Benjamin I. Ruttenberg ,&nbsp;Danny Han ,&nbsp;Eli Newman ,&nbsp;Ethan R. Deyle ,&nbsp;Sucharita Gopal ,&nbsp;Les Kaufman","doi":"10.1016/j.envdev.2024.101005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Achieving a blue economy will require reconciling the value of emerging ocean uses with their impacts on the seascape and sectors with historical access to marine resources and areas. To meet this challenge, we developed an analytical framework for conducting marine spatial planning through tradeoff analysis, and applied it to prospective offshore wind energy development in the ∼974 km<sup>2</sup> Morro Bay, California, USA Wind Energy Area (WEA). We generated spatial data layers estimating MW power production and impacts on fisheries value and marine wildlife conservation (seabird and cetacean populations) from wind farm development. We then quantified each sector's response to plans of development across the WEA and inside three leases recently acquired by the energy industry for prospective development. Finally, we integrated the sector response data into an analytical framework for mitigating sector tradeoffs with novel spatial planning solutions (maps of wind farm size, location, and configuration) that optimally maximize value to the emergent energy sector (MW power) while minimizing impacts to historical (fisheries and wildlife) sectors. We found that western sites in the WEA had the highest potential power production concurrent with the lowest impact on the historical sectors, revealing the eastern lease to be less efficient at optimally balancing the sector's objectives relative to the development of the central or western leases or the optimal spatial plans identified in the tradeoff analysis. Within a lease, tradeoff analysis found spatial planning able to generate out-sized savings in fisheries value with only modest losses in MW power – for example, by avoiding development in just 5% of the eastern lease to preserve nearly half its fisheries value and still generate 95% its total power potential. Small-scale development opportunities (e.g., a pilot project) with significant power potential and no fisheries impact were also identified, in this case by placing turbines in an area in the western lease with no fisheries value and high power production potential. These plans would also have a relatively low impact on the wildlife conservation sectors, due to decreases in vulnerability levels of both seabird and cetacean populations to turbines going from east to west across the WEA. Our results can inform site evaluation and permitting processes for wind energy development in the Morro Bay WEA. We also expect the tradeoff analysis framework we developed to provide a simple and actionable analytical tool for supporting marine spatial planning of offshore wind energy and other emerging blue economy activities from a balanced perspective that values emerging uses of marine resources alongside existing socio-economic and conservation interests.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54269,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Development","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 101005"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464524000435/pdfft?md5=4358fe57e818e632741cc710e738475f&pid=1-s2.0-S2211464524000435-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatial planning offshore wind energy farms in California for mediating fisheries and wildlife conservation impacts\",\"authors\":\"Crow White ,&nbsp;Yi-Hi Wang ,&nbsp;Ryan K. Walter ,&nbsp;Benjamin I. Ruttenberg ,&nbsp;Danny Han ,&nbsp;Eli Newman ,&nbsp;Ethan R. Deyle ,&nbsp;Sucharita Gopal ,&nbsp;Les Kaufman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envdev.2024.101005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Achieving a blue economy will require reconciling the value of emerging ocean uses with their impacts on the seascape and sectors with historical access to marine resources and areas. To meet this challenge, we developed an analytical framework for conducting marine spatial planning through tradeoff analysis, and applied it to prospective offshore wind energy development in the ∼974 km<sup>2</sup> Morro Bay, California, USA Wind Energy Area (WEA). We generated spatial data layers estimating MW power production and impacts on fisheries value and marine wildlife conservation (seabird and cetacean populations) from wind farm development. We then quantified each sector's response to plans of development across the WEA and inside three leases recently acquired by the energy industry for prospective development. Finally, we integrated the sector response data into an analytical framework for mitigating sector tradeoffs with novel spatial planning solutions (maps of wind farm size, location, and configuration) that optimally maximize value to the emergent energy sector (MW power) while minimizing impacts to historical (fisheries and wildlife) sectors. We found that western sites in the WEA had the highest potential power production concurrent with the lowest impact on the historical sectors, revealing the eastern lease to be less efficient at optimally balancing the sector's objectives relative to the development of the central or western leases or the optimal spatial plans identified in the tradeoff analysis. Within a lease, tradeoff analysis found spatial planning able to generate out-sized savings in fisheries value with only modest losses in MW power – for example, by avoiding development in just 5% of the eastern lease to preserve nearly half its fisheries value and still generate 95% its total power potential. Small-scale development opportunities (e.g., a pilot project) with significant power potential and no fisheries impact were also identified, in this case by placing turbines in an area in the western lease with no fisheries value and high power production potential. These plans would also have a relatively low impact on the wildlife conservation sectors, due to decreases in vulnerability levels of both seabird and cetacean populations to turbines going from east to west across the WEA. Our results can inform site evaluation and permitting processes for wind energy development in the Morro Bay WEA. We also expect the tradeoff analysis framework we developed to provide a simple and actionable analytical tool for supporting marine spatial planning of offshore wind energy and other emerging blue economy activities from a balanced perspective that values emerging uses of marine resources alongside existing socio-economic and conservation interests.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Development\",\"volume\":\"51 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101005\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464524000435/pdfft?md5=4358fe57e818e632741cc710e738475f&pid=1-s2.0-S2211464524000435-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464524000435\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464524000435","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

要实现蓝色经济,就必须协调好新兴海洋用途的价值与其对海景和历来可利用海洋资源和海域的部门的影响。为了应对这一挑战,我们开发了一个通过权衡分析进行海洋空间规划的分析框架,并将其应用于美国加利福尼亚州莫罗湾风能区(WEA)974 平方公里的海上风能开发。我们生成了空间数据层,估算风电场开发的兆瓦发电量以及对渔业价值和海洋野生动物保护(海鸟和鲸类种群)的影响。然后,我们量化了各部门对整个 WEA 和能源行业最近获得的三个潜在开发租约内的开发计划的反应。最后,我们将各部门的反应数据整合到一个分析框架中,通过新颖的空间规划解决方案(风电场规模、位置和配置图)来减轻各部门之间的权衡,从而最大限度地提高新兴能源部门(兆瓦电力)的价值,同时最大限度地减少对历史部门(渔业和野生动物)的影响。我们发现,西部经济区的西部地点具有最高的潜在发电量,同时对历史部门的影响最小,这表明相对于中部或西部租借地的开发或权衡分析中确定的最佳空间规划,东部租借地在优化平衡部门目标方面的效率较低。权衡分析发现,在一个租借地内,空间规划能够节省大量渔业价值,而仅损失少量兆瓦电力--例如,通过避免开发东部租借地的5%,可保留近一半的渔业价值,同时仍能产生95%的总电力潜力。此外,还确定了发电潜力大且不影响渔业的小规模开发机会(如试点项目),在这种情况下,可在西部租约中没有渔业价值但发电潜力大的区域安装涡轮机。这些计划对野生动物保护领域的影响也相对较小,因为海鸟和鲸类种群对涡轮机从东向西穿过西部经济区的脆弱性水平都有所降低。我们的研究结果可为莫罗湾 WEA 风能开发的选址评估和许可过程提供参考。我们还希望我们开发的权衡分析框架能够提供一个简单可行的分析工具,从平衡的角度支持海上风能和其他新兴蓝色经济活动的海洋空间规划,在重视海洋资源的新兴用途的同时,重视现有的社会经济和保护利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spatial planning offshore wind energy farms in California for mediating fisheries and wildlife conservation impacts

Achieving a blue economy will require reconciling the value of emerging ocean uses with their impacts on the seascape and sectors with historical access to marine resources and areas. To meet this challenge, we developed an analytical framework for conducting marine spatial planning through tradeoff analysis, and applied it to prospective offshore wind energy development in the ∼974 km2 Morro Bay, California, USA Wind Energy Area (WEA). We generated spatial data layers estimating MW power production and impacts on fisheries value and marine wildlife conservation (seabird and cetacean populations) from wind farm development. We then quantified each sector's response to plans of development across the WEA and inside three leases recently acquired by the energy industry for prospective development. Finally, we integrated the sector response data into an analytical framework for mitigating sector tradeoffs with novel spatial planning solutions (maps of wind farm size, location, and configuration) that optimally maximize value to the emergent energy sector (MW power) while minimizing impacts to historical (fisheries and wildlife) sectors. We found that western sites in the WEA had the highest potential power production concurrent with the lowest impact on the historical sectors, revealing the eastern lease to be less efficient at optimally balancing the sector's objectives relative to the development of the central or western leases or the optimal spatial plans identified in the tradeoff analysis. Within a lease, tradeoff analysis found spatial planning able to generate out-sized savings in fisheries value with only modest losses in MW power – for example, by avoiding development in just 5% of the eastern lease to preserve nearly half its fisheries value and still generate 95% its total power potential. Small-scale development opportunities (e.g., a pilot project) with significant power potential and no fisheries impact were also identified, in this case by placing turbines in an area in the western lease with no fisheries value and high power production potential. These plans would also have a relatively low impact on the wildlife conservation sectors, due to decreases in vulnerability levels of both seabird and cetacean populations to turbines going from east to west across the WEA. Our results can inform site evaluation and permitting processes for wind energy development in the Morro Bay WEA. We also expect the tradeoff analysis framework we developed to provide a simple and actionable analytical tool for supporting marine spatial planning of offshore wind energy and other emerging blue economy activities from a balanced perspective that values emerging uses of marine resources alongside existing socio-economic and conservation interests.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Development
Environmental Development Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
62
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Development provides a future oriented, pro-active, authoritative source of information and learning for researchers, postgraduate students, policymakers, and managers, and bridges the gap between fundamental research and the application in management and policy practices. It stimulates the exchange and coupling of traditional scientific knowledge on the environment, with the experiential knowledge among decision makers and other stakeholders and also connects natural sciences and social and behavioral sciences. Environmental Development includes and promotes scientific work from the non-western world, and also strengthens the collaboration between the developed and developing world. Further it links environmental research to broader issues of economic and social-cultural developments, and is intended to shorten the delays between research and publication, while ensuring thorough peer review. Environmental Development also creates a forum for transnational communication, discussion and global action. Environmental Development is open to a broad range of disciplines and authors. The journal welcomes, in particular, contributions from a younger generation of researchers, and papers expanding the frontiers of environmental sciences, pointing at new directions and innovative answers. All submissions to Environmental Development are reviewed using the general criteria of quality, originality, precision, importance of topic and insights, clarity of exposition, which are in keeping with the journal''s aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信