反能源贫困政策造成能源贫困?中国北方 "煤改气 "政策的影响分析

Jianping Yao , Lingzi Zhang , Zhanping Hu , Yanan Xie
{"title":"反能源贫困政策造成能源贫困?中国北方 \"煤改气 \"政策的影响分析","authors":"Jianping Yao ,&nbsp;Lingzi Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhanping Hu ,&nbsp;Yanan Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.wds.2024.100154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The recent <strong>“</strong>coal-to-gas\" (CTG) energy policy serves as an important measure to mitigate air pollution in northern China, and also carries out a mission of alleviating rural energy poverty. To unravel the impact of the CTG policy on rural energy poverty, this study examines the effect on economic and well-being dimensions of energy poverty based on data from five villages in northern China. The findings indicate that in general the CTG policy only limitedly alleviated rural energy poverty with effects varying significantly across different social groups. Economically, the policy has significantly increased recipients’ financial burden, and thereby exacerbated their energy poverty. In terms of well-being, the policy has improved the quality of life for villagers by reducing cooking time and raising indoor temperature, thus contributing to a reduction in energy poverty. The CTG recipients are distinguished into four categories based on varied experiences on economic and well-being aspects, with only one third experiencing overall positive impacts. The study suggests that energy policies intended to alleviate energy poverty may paradoxically perpetuate it. The differential impact across social groups calls for more nuanced and targeted approaches to mitigate the adverse effects of energy policies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101285,"journal":{"name":"World Development Sustainability","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772655X24000326/pdfft?md5=dfd8647ad9203520d9958a3a608e2a4f&pid=1-s2.0-S2772655X24000326-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creating energy poverty by an anti-energy poverty policy? An analysis of the impact of the “coal-to-gas” policy in Northern China\",\"authors\":\"Jianping Yao ,&nbsp;Lingzi Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhanping Hu ,&nbsp;Yanan Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wds.2024.100154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The recent <strong>“</strong>coal-to-gas\\\" (CTG) energy policy serves as an important measure to mitigate air pollution in northern China, and also carries out a mission of alleviating rural energy poverty. To unravel the impact of the CTG policy on rural energy poverty, this study examines the effect on economic and well-being dimensions of energy poverty based on data from five villages in northern China. The findings indicate that in general the CTG policy only limitedly alleviated rural energy poverty with effects varying significantly across different social groups. Economically, the policy has significantly increased recipients’ financial burden, and thereby exacerbated their energy poverty. In terms of well-being, the policy has improved the quality of life for villagers by reducing cooking time and raising indoor temperature, thus contributing to a reduction in energy poverty. The CTG recipients are distinguished into four categories based on varied experiences on economic and well-being aspects, with only one third experiencing overall positive impacts. The study suggests that energy policies intended to alleviate energy poverty may paradoxically perpetuate it. The differential impact across social groups calls for more nuanced and targeted approaches to mitigate the adverse effects of energy policies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Development Sustainability\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772655X24000326/pdfft?md5=dfd8647ad9203520d9958a3a608e2a4f&pid=1-s2.0-S2772655X24000326-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Development Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772655X24000326\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Development Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772655X24000326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近期出台的 "煤改气"(CTG)能源政策是缓解中国北方空气污染的一项重要措施,同时也肩负着缓解农村能源贫困的使命。为了揭示 "煤改气 "政策对农村能源贫困的影响,本研究以中国北方五个村庄的数据为基础,考察了 "煤改气 "政策对能源贫困的经济和福利方面的影响。研究结果表明,总体而言,易地扶贫搬迁政策只是有限地缓解了农村能源贫困,对不同社会群体的影响差异显著。在经济上,该政策大大加重了受惠者的经济负担,从而加剧了他们的能源贫困。在福利方面,该政策通过减少做饭时间和提高室内温度改善了村民的生活质量,从而有助于减少能源贫困。根据在经济和福利方面的不同体验,全面贸易补助金的受惠者被分为四类,只有三分之一的受惠者体验到了全面的积极影响。这项研究表明,旨在缓解能源贫困的能源政策可能会使能源贫困永久化。对不同社会群体的不同影响要求采取更加细致和有针对性的方法,以减轻能源政策的不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Creating energy poverty by an anti-energy poverty policy? An analysis of the impact of the “coal-to-gas” policy in Northern China

The recent coal-to-gas" (CTG) energy policy serves as an important measure to mitigate air pollution in northern China, and also carries out a mission of alleviating rural energy poverty. To unravel the impact of the CTG policy on rural energy poverty, this study examines the effect on economic and well-being dimensions of energy poverty based on data from five villages in northern China. The findings indicate that in general the CTG policy only limitedly alleviated rural energy poverty with effects varying significantly across different social groups. Economically, the policy has significantly increased recipients’ financial burden, and thereby exacerbated their energy poverty. In terms of well-being, the policy has improved the quality of life for villagers by reducing cooking time and raising indoor temperature, thus contributing to a reduction in energy poverty. The CTG recipients are distinguished into four categories based on varied experiences on economic and well-being aspects, with only one third experiencing overall positive impacts. The study suggests that energy policies intended to alleviate energy poverty may paradoxically perpetuate it. The differential impact across social groups calls for more nuanced and targeted approaches to mitigate the adverse effects of energy policies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信