Boyd Buis , Mary Pieterse-Bloem , Willem F.C. Verschoor , Remco C.J. Zwinkels
{"title":"伽马定位和市场质量","authors":"Boyd Buis , Mary Pieterse-Bloem , Willem F.C. Verschoor , Remco C.J. Zwinkels","doi":"10.1016/j.jedc.2024.104880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, we study the effect of the gamma positioning of dynamic hedgers on market quality through simulations. In our zero-intelligence model, the presence of dynamic hedgers enhances market liquidity under normal conditions. However, positive gamma helps sustain liquidity in stressed scenarios, while negative gamma depletes it. We find that an increase in the net gamma positioning of dynamic hedgers reduces volatility and increases market stability, whereas a negative gamma positioning increases volatility and makes the market more prone to failure. Price discovery typically worsens when dynamic hedgers become more prevalent, regardless of the sign of their positioning. Our findings imply that steering the net gamma position of dynamic hedgers can be considered a policy instrument to improve market quality, especially for instruments with low liquidity or low traded volume.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48314,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 104880"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165188924000721/pdfft?md5=ae05024e1ab52b62090ee86195a78dab&pid=1-s2.0-S0165188924000721-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gamma positioning and market quality\",\"authors\":\"Boyd Buis , Mary Pieterse-Bloem , Willem F.C. Verschoor , Remco C.J. Zwinkels\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jedc.2024.104880\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this paper, we study the effect of the gamma positioning of dynamic hedgers on market quality through simulations. In our zero-intelligence model, the presence of dynamic hedgers enhances market liquidity under normal conditions. However, positive gamma helps sustain liquidity in stressed scenarios, while negative gamma depletes it. We find that an increase in the net gamma positioning of dynamic hedgers reduces volatility and increases market stability, whereas a negative gamma positioning increases volatility and makes the market more prone to failure. Price discovery typically worsens when dynamic hedgers become more prevalent, regardless of the sign of their positioning. Our findings imply that steering the net gamma position of dynamic hedgers can be considered a policy instrument to improve market quality, especially for instruments with low liquidity or low traded volume.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control\",\"volume\":\"164 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104880\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165188924000721/pdfft?md5=ae05024e1ab52b62090ee86195a78dab&pid=1-s2.0-S0165188924000721-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165188924000721\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165188924000721","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
In this paper, we study the effect of the gamma positioning of dynamic hedgers on market quality through simulations. In our zero-intelligence model, the presence of dynamic hedgers enhances market liquidity under normal conditions. However, positive gamma helps sustain liquidity in stressed scenarios, while negative gamma depletes it. We find that an increase in the net gamma positioning of dynamic hedgers reduces volatility and increases market stability, whereas a negative gamma positioning increases volatility and makes the market more prone to failure. Price discovery typically worsens when dynamic hedgers become more prevalent, regardless of the sign of their positioning. Our findings imply that steering the net gamma position of dynamic hedgers can be considered a policy instrument to improve market quality, especially for instruments with low liquidity or low traded volume.
期刊介绍:
The journal provides an outlet for publication of research concerning all theoretical and empirical aspects of economic dynamics and control as well as the development and use of computational methods in economics and finance. Contributions regarding computational methods may include, but are not restricted to, artificial intelligence, databases, decision support systems, genetic algorithms, modelling languages, neural networks, numerical algorithms for optimization, control and equilibria, parallel computing and qualitative reasoning.