要不要 ChatGPT?探索广告业中生成式人工智能的悖论

IF 5.8 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
{"title":"要不要 ChatGPT?探索广告业中生成式人工智能的悖论","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bushor.2024.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Generative AI (GenAI) technology is evoking both excitement and fear about its potential impact across a host of industries—including advertising, where it is expected to have a significant disruptive effect. This article utilizes the paradox lens to explore the implications of text-to-text GenAI in the form of ChatGPT for the advertising industry. Drawing on 48 interviews with advertising professionals, we identify three <em>operational</em> paradoxes that are associated with conducting research, creativity, efficiency, and one <em>psychological</em> paradox related to work identity. To gain a competitive advantage, we urge practitioners to adopt a confrontation-based coping strategy to navigate these paradoxes. This can be mobilized via an ambidexterity or contingency paradox management approach. We outline specific tactics in this article.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48347,"journal":{"name":"Business Horizons","volume":"67 5","pages":"Pages 571-581"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681324000624/pdfft?md5=2d3d1fc185a34c438952eaa65ca2a0f4&pid=1-s2.0-S0007681324000624-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To ChatGPT, or not to ChatGPT: Navigating the paradoxes of generative AI in the advertising industry\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bushor.2024.05.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Generative AI (GenAI) technology is evoking both excitement and fear about its potential impact across a host of industries—including advertising, where it is expected to have a significant disruptive effect. This article utilizes the paradox lens to explore the implications of text-to-text GenAI in the form of ChatGPT for the advertising industry. Drawing on 48 interviews with advertising professionals, we identify three <em>operational</em> paradoxes that are associated with conducting research, creativity, efficiency, and one <em>psychological</em> paradox related to work identity. To gain a competitive advantage, we urge practitioners to adopt a confrontation-based coping strategy to navigate these paradoxes. This can be mobilized via an ambidexterity or contingency paradox management approach. We outline specific tactics in this article.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Horizons\",\"volume\":\"67 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 571-581\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681324000624/pdfft?md5=2d3d1fc185a34c438952eaa65ca2a0f4&pid=1-s2.0-S0007681324000624-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Horizons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681324000624\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Horizons","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681324000624","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生成式人工智能(GenAI)技术对各行各业--包括广告业--的潜在影响既令人兴奋又令人担忧,预计它将产生重大的颠覆性影响。本文利用悖论视角来探讨以 ChatGPT 为形式的文本到文本 GenAI 对广告业的影响。通过对 48 位广告专业人士的访谈,我们发现了与开展研究、创造力和效率相关的三个操作悖论,以及一个与工作身份相关的心理悖论。为了获得竞争优势,我们敦促从业人员采取一种以对抗为基础的应对策略来驾驭这些悖论。这可以通过 "灵活应变 "或 "应急悖论管理 "的方法来实现。我们将在本文中概述具体策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
To ChatGPT, or not to ChatGPT: Navigating the paradoxes of generative AI in the advertising industry

Generative AI (GenAI) technology is evoking both excitement and fear about its potential impact across a host of industries—including advertising, where it is expected to have a significant disruptive effect. This article utilizes the paradox lens to explore the implications of text-to-text GenAI in the form of ChatGPT for the advertising industry. Drawing on 48 interviews with advertising professionals, we identify three operational paradoxes that are associated with conducting research, creativity, efficiency, and one psychological paradox related to work identity. To gain a competitive advantage, we urge practitioners to adopt a confrontation-based coping strategy to navigate these paradoxes. This can be mobilized via an ambidexterity or contingency paradox management approach. We outline specific tactics in this article.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Business Horizons
Business Horizons BUSINESS-
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
5.40%
发文量
105
期刊介绍: Business Horizons, the bimonthly journal of the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University, is dedicated to publishing original articles that appeal to both business academics and practitioners. Our editorial focus is on covering a diverse array of topics within the broader field of business, with a particular emphasis on identifying critical business issues and proposing practical solutions. Our goal is to inspire readers to approach business practices from new and innovative perspectives. Business Horizons occupies a distinctive position among business publications by offering articles that strike a balance between academic rigor and practical relevance. As such, our articles are grounded in scholarly research yet presented in a clear and accessible format, making them relevant to a broad audience within the business community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信