古今结合:意念在提高调息练习参与度方面的力量

IF 1.7 Q2 Medicine
Denise Peerbhoy, David Sheffield
{"title":"古今结合:意念在提高调息练习参与度方面的力量","authors":"Denise Peerbhoy,&nbsp;David Sheffield","doi":"10.1016/j.aimed.2024.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A feasibility study using trial methodology comparing the impact of two behavioural motivational interventions on intention to practice and engagement with pranayama and perceived wellbeing a week after the intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Healthcare professionals, from mainstream and complementary disciplines were randomised into one of two motivational conditions, Pranayama with an Implementation Intention statement and Pranayama with a Benefits Analysis statement. Interventions were delivered via Qualtrics which embedded an unlisted YouTube demonstration for different conditions. A qualitative analysis of the self-generated statements was conducted alongside a quantitative analysis for general wellbeing based on outcome from the WHO-5, and measures of affect, motivation, capability, and opportunity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>155 participants showed an interest in the study, with an intention to treat (n=84) analysis performed. Both motivational messages were associated with increased practice and intention to practice pranayama over time, an increased sense of capability and opportunity for practise, limited impact on emotional regulation and no change in general wellbeing. Qualitative findings showed implementation intention effectiveness is not necessarily based on verbatim remembering, subjective benefits experienced were mainly emotional, or a combination of somatic and emotional; that challenges of working in healthcare environments possibly block implementation intentions from being used effectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This one-week intervention was adequate to increase practise and intention to practise pranayama. An adequate number of people participated in this study; study retention was high. Participants were highly motivated and the main barriers to engagement linked to capability and opportunity. Further exploration about the mechanism that encourages people to practise pranayama in different settings is required.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7343,"journal":{"name":"Advances in integrative medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212958824000545/pdfft?md5=caa1ffcdc066971cf432c787dc4e3ab2&pid=1-s2.0-S2212958824000545-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining ancient and modern: The power of Intention in increasing engagement in Pranayama practice\",\"authors\":\"Denise Peerbhoy,&nbsp;David Sheffield\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aimed.2024.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A feasibility study using trial methodology comparing the impact of two behavioural motivational interventions on intention to practice and engagement with pranayama and perceived wellbeing a week after the intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Healthcare professionals, from mainstream and complementary disciplines were randomised into one of two motivational conditions, Pranayama with an Implementation Intention statement and Pranayama with a Benefits Analysis statement. Interventions were delivered via Qualtrics which embedded an unlisted YouTube demonstration for different conditions. A qualitative analysis of the self-generated statements was conducted alongside a quantitative analysis for general wellbeing based on outcome from the WHO-5, and measures of affect, motivation, capability, and opportunity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>155 participants showed an interest in the study, with an intention to treat (n=84) analysis performed. Both motivational messages were associated with increased practice and intention to practice pranayama over time, an increased sense of capability and opportunity for practise, limited impact on emotional regulation and no change in general wellbeing. Qualitative findings showed implementation intention effectiveness is not necessarily based on verbatim remembering, subjective benefits experienced were mainly emotional, or a combination of somatic and emotional; that challenges of working in healthcare environments possibly block implementation intentions from being used effectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This one-week intervention was adequate to increase practise and intention to practise pranayama. An adequate number of people participated in this study; study retention was high. Participants were highly motivated and the main barriers to engagement linked to capability and opportunity. Further exploration about the mechanism that encourages people to practise pranayama in different settings is required.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in integrative medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212958824000545/pdfft?md5=caa1ffcdc066971cf432c787dc4e3ab2&pid=1-s2.0-S2212958824000545-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in integrative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212958824000545\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in integrative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212958824000545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景这是一项采用试验方法进行的可行性研究,比较了两种行为激励干预措施对练习意向和参与调息法的影响,以及干预一周后的健康感知。材料与方法来自主流学科和辅助学科的医护人员被随机分配到两种激励条件中的一种,即带有实施意向声明的调息法和带有收益分析声明的调息法。干预措施是通过 Qualtrics 提供的,其中嵌入了针对不同条件的未上市 YouTube 演示。在对自我生成的声明进行定性分析的同时,还对基于 WHO-5 结果的总体健康状况进行了定量分析,并对情感、动机、能力和机会进行了测量。结果 155 名参与者对研究表示了兴趣,并进行了意向治疗(n=84)分析。两种激励信息都与随着时间的推移练习调息法的次数和意向的增加、练习能力和机会感的提高有关,但对情绪调节的影响有限,总体健康状况没有变化。定性研究结果表明,实施意向的有效性并不一定基于逐字记忆,体验到的主观益处主要是情绪上的,或者是躯体和情绪的结合;在医疗环境中工作所面临的挑战可能会阻碍实施意向的有效利用。有足够多的人参与了这项研究;研究保留率很高。参与者的积极性很高,参与的主要障碍与能力和机会有关。需要进一步探索在不同环境中鼓励人们练习调息法的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combining ancient and modern: The power of Intention in increasing engagement in Pranayama practice

Background

A feasibility study using trial methodology comparing the impact of two behavioural motivational interventions on intention to practice and engagement with pranayama and perceived wellbeing a week after the intervention.

Materials and methods

Healthcare professionals, from mainstream and complementary disciplines were randomised into one of two motivational conditions, Pranayama with an Implementation Intention statement and Pranayama with a Benefits Analysis statement. Interventions were delivered via Qualtrics which embedded an unlisted YouTube demonstration for different conditions. A qualitative analysis of the self-generated statements was conducted alongside a quantitative analysis for general wellbeing based on outcome from the WHO-5, and measures of affect, motivation, capability, and opportunity.

Results

155 participants showed an interest in the study, with an intention to treat (n=84) analysis performed. Both motivational messages were associated with increased practice and intention to practice pranayama over time, an increased sense of capability and opportunity for practise, limited impact on emotional regulation and no change in general wellbeing. Qualitative findings showed implementation intention effectiveness is not necessarily based on verbatim remembering, subjective benefits experienced were mainly emotional, or a combination of somatic and emotional; that challenges of working in healthcare environments possibly block implementation intentions from being used effectively.

Conclusion

This one-week intervention was adequate to increase practise and intention to practise pranayama. An adequate number of people participated in this study; study retention was high. Participants were highly motivated and the main barriers to engagement linked to capability and opportunity. Further exploration about the mechanism that encourages people to practise pranayama in different settings is required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in integrative medicine
Advances in integrative medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Integrative Medicine (AIMED) is an international peer-reviewed, evidence-based research and review journal that is multi-disciplinary within the fields of Integrative and Complementary Medicine. The journal focuses on rigorous quantitative and qualitative research including systematic reviews, clinical trials and surveys, whilst also welcoming medical hypotheses and clinically-relevant articles and case studies disclosing practical learning tools for the consulting practitioner. By promoting research and practice excellence in the field, and cross collaboration between relevant practitioner groups and associations, the journal aims to advance the practice of IM, identify areas for future research, and improve patient health outcomes. International networking is encouraged through clinical innovation, the establishment of best practice and by providing opportunities for cooperation between organisations and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信