Timothy S. Sannes , Tamar Parmet , Miryam Yusufov , Jodi Sutherland , Jennifer Stefanik , Nicole Andrade , Tamryn F. Gray , Ilana M. Braun , William F. Pirl
{"title":"我的压力有多大?护理人员对新出现的压力生物标志物的反应定性研究","authors":"Timothy S. Sannes , Tamar Parmet , Miryam Yusufov , Jodi Sutherland , Jennifer Stefanik , Nicole Andrade , Tamryn F. Gray , Ilana M. Braun , William F. Pirl","doi":"10.1016/j.bbih.2024.100783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Caregivers of adults with cancer often report significant distress yet remain difficult to engage in supportive services. While the field of Psychosomatic Medicine has continued to identify important markers of physiologic stress, and demonstrated disruption in these markers in caregiver populations, no research has investigated whether biomarker information on caregivers’ reaction to stress could impact their willingness to address their ongoing distress.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Here, we report on a qualitative study (<em>N</em> = 17) in which we conducted individual interviews with cancer caregivers to explore their key attitudes towards, and subjective experience of, mock stress biomarker data. A total of 17 caregivers of patients (<em>M</em> age = 56.1 years; <em>SD</em> = 12.3) with primarily metastatic brain tumors (glioblastoma) were interviewed regarding four commercially available biomarkers (telomere length; hair cortisol, activity levels and heart rate variability). Once presented with information about stress biomarkers, caregivers were asked to discuss their subjective reaction <em>as if it was their own data</em> as well as their motivation and willingness to seek support after receiving such information. We identified and extracted relevant themes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Analysis utilizing the framework method revealed four emerging themes. The first theme described caregivers' ability to manage stress and willingness to engage with supportive services. Second, caregivers generally accepted the biomarker data but preferred it to be presented in a specific way. The third theme demonstrated that for some, biomarker data may actually increase their subjective distress (e.g., whether or not something could be done to improve their mental state). The last theme described how biomarkers were generally received as meaningful motivators that could increase caregivers’ willingness to engage with supportive services.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In addition to the more general identified theme of CG's willingness to engage with additional support, we gained insights into caregivers' reaction to the stress biomarkers presented. Findings will set the stage for the utility of stress biomarker information and whether it influences cancer caregivers' willingness to address their distress and motivation to engage in supportive services.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72454,"journal":{"name":"Brain, behavior, & immunity - health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666354624000619/pdfft?md5=3604eeaa16d83b4da018949c734e2995&pid=1-s2.0-S2666354624000619-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"So what I'm stressed? A qualitative study examininga caregivers' reactions to emerging biomarkers of stress\",\"authors\":\"Timothy S. Sannes , Tamar Parmet , Miryam Yusufov , Jodi Sutherland , Jennifer Stefanik , Nicole Andrade , Tamryn F. Gray , Ilana M. Braun , William F. Pirl\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bbih.2024.100783\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Caregivers of adults with cancer often report significant distress yet remain difficult to engage in supportive services. While the field of Psychosomatic Medicine has continued to identify important markers of physiologic stress, and demonstrated disruption in these markers in caregiver populations, no research has investigated whether biomarker information on caregivers’ reaction to stress could impact their willingness to address their ongoing distress.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Here, we report on a qualitative study (<em>N</em> = 17) in which we conducted individual interviews with cancer caregivers to explore their key attitudes towards, and subjective experience of, mock stress biomarker data. A total of 17 caregivers of patients (<em>M</em> age = 56.1 years; <em>SD</em> = 12.3) with primarily metastatic brain tumors (glioblastoma) were interviewed regarding four commercially available biomarkers (telomere length; hair cortisol, activity levels and heart rate variability). Once presented with information about stress biomarkers, caregivers were asked to discuss their subjective reaction <em>as if it was their own data</em> as well as their motivation and willingness to seek support after receiving such information. We identified and extracted relevant themes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Analysis utilizing the framework method revealed four emerging themes. The first theme described caregivers' ability to manage stress and willingness to engage with supportive services. Second, caregivers generally accepted the biomarker data but preferred it to be presented in a specific way. The third theme demonstrated that for some, biomarker data may actually increase their subjective distress (e.g., whether or not something could be done to improve their mental state). The last theme described how biomarkers were generally received as meaningful motivators that could increase caregivers’ willingness to engage with supportive services.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In addition to the more general identified theme of CG's willingness to engage with additional support, we gained insights into caregivers' reaction to the stress biomarkers presented. Findings will set the stage for the utility of stress biomarker information and whether it influences cancer caregivers' willingness to address their distress and motivation to engage in supportive services.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain, behavior, & immunity - health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666354624000619/pdfft?md5=3604eeaa16d83b4da018949c734e2995&pid=1-s2.0-S2666354624000619-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain, behavior, & immunity - health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666354624000619\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain, behavior, & immunity - health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666354624000619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
So what I'm stressed? A qualitative study examininga caregivers' reactions to emerging biomarkers of stress
Background
Caregivers of adults with cancer often report significant distress yet remain difficult to engage in supportive services. While the field of Psychosomatic Medicine has continued to identify important markers of physiologic stress, and demonstrated disruption in these markers in caregiver populations, no research has investigated whether biomarker information on caregivers’ reaction to stress could impact their willingness to address their ongoing distress.
Methods
Here, we report on a qualitative study (N = 17) in which we conducted individual interviews with cancer caregivers to explore their key attitudes towards, and subjective experience of, mock stress biomarker data. A total of 17 caregivers of patients (M age = 56.1 years; SD = 12.3) with primarily metastatic brain tumors (glioblastoma) were interviewed regarding four commercially available biomarkers (telomere length; hair cortisol, activity levels and heart rate variability). Once presented with information about stress biomarkers, caregivers were asked to discuss their subjective reaction as if it was their own data as well as their motivation and willingness to seek support after receiving such information. We identified and extracted relevant themes.
Results
Analysis utilizing the framework method revealed four emerging themes. The first theme described caregivers' ability to manage stress and willingness to engage with supportive services. Second, caregivers generally accepted the biomarker data but preferred it to be presented in a specific way. The third theme demonstrated that for some, biomarker data may actually increase their subjective distress (e.g., whether or not something could be done to improve their mental state). The last theme described how biomarkers were generally received as meaningful motivators that could increase caregivers’ willingness to engage with supportive services.
Conclusions
In addition to the more general identified theme of CG's willingness to engage with additional support, we gained insights into caregivers' reaction to the stress biomarkers presented. Findings will set the stage for the utility of stress biomarker information and whether it influences cancer caregivers' willingness to address their distress and motivation to engage in supportive services.