印度农村分隔公路安全评估研究的拟议路段长度

IF 3.2 Q3 TRANSPORTATION
Laxman Singh Bisht , Sai Chand , Geetam Tiwari
{"title":"印度农村分隔公路安全评估研究的拟议路段长度","authors":"Laxman Singh Bisht ,&nbsp;Sai Chand ,&nbsp;Geetam Tiwari","doi":"10.1016/j.iatssr.2024.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Determining an appropriate segment length for highway safety evaluations in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) poses a significant challenge. This study aims to address this issue by recommending a suitable segment length for such evaluations in India, using a 167 km intercity expressway as a case study. We employed negative binomial (NB) models on datasets segmented from 100 m to 1000 m with 100 m increments. Our findings strongly suggest that segment lengths from 300 m to 700-m suit various safety assessments. However, the study reveals that parameter estimates vary significantly with both segment length and sample size. This highlights the sensitivity of parameters to data aggregation and sample size across different segment lengths, making it difficult to identify a single optimal length. Therefore, we propose selecting the segment length and segmentation approach based on specific local conditions, highway context, data availability and quality. The methodology presented here can guide policymakers in LMICs to make informed choices regarding segment length for safety evaluations, including blackspot identification and treatment on their highways.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47059,"journal":{"name":"IATSS Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0386111224000220/pdfft?md5=b7e52b484f9a7f9560c536d74465bde9&pid=1-s2.0-S0386111224000220-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proposed segment length for safety evaluation studies on rural divided highways in India\",\"authors\":\"Laxman Singh Bisht ,&nbsp;Sai Chand ,&nbsp;Geetam Tiwari\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iatssr.2024.05.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Determining an appropriate segment length for highway safety evaluations in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) poses a significant challenge. This study aims to address this issue by recommending a suitable segment length for such evaluations in India, using a 167 km intercity expressway as a case study. We employed negative binomial (NB) models on datasets segmented from 100 m to 1000 m with 100 m increments. Our findings strongly suggest that segment lengths from 300 m to 700-m suit various safety assessments. However, the study reveals that parameter estimates vary significantly with both segment length and sample size. This highlights the sensitivity of parameters to data aggregation and sample size across different segment lengths, making it difficult to identify a single optimal length. Therefore, we propose selecting the segment length and segmentation approach based on specific local conditions, highway context, data availability and quality. The methodology presented here can guide policymakers in LMICs to make informed choices regarding segment length for safety evaluations, including blackspot identification and treatment on their highways.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IATSS Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0386111224000220/pdfft?md5=b7e52b484f9a7f9560c536d74465bde9&pid=1-s2.0-S0386111224000220-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IATSS Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0386111224000220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IATSS Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0386111224000220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为中低收入国家(LMICs)的高速公路安全评估确定合适的路段长度是一项重大挑战。本研究以一条 167 公里长的城际高速公路为案例,通过为印度的此类评估推荐合适的路段长度来解决这一问题。我们采用负二项(NB)模型对数据集进行了分析,数据集的分段长度从 100 米到 1000 米,每 100 米递增一次。我们的研究结果强烈表明,300 米至 700 米的路段长度适合各种安全评估。然而,研究显示,参数估计值随着分段长度和样本大小的变化而显著不同。这凸显了不同路段长度的参数对数据汇总和样本量的敏感性,因此很难确定单一的最佳长度。因此,我们建议根据具体的当地条件、高速公路背景、数据可用性和质量来选择路段长度和路段划分方法。本文介绍的方法可指导低收入国家的政策制定者在安全评估(包括公路黑点识别和处理)中对路段长度做出明智的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proposed segment length for safety evaluation studies on rural divided highways in India

Determining an appropriate segment length for highway safety evaluations in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) poses a significant challenge. This study aims to address this issue by recommending a suitable segment length for such evaluations in India, using a 167 km intercity expressway as a case study. We employed negative binomial (NB) models on datasets segmented from 100 m to 1000 m with 100 m increments. Our findings strongly suggest that segment lengths from 300 m to 700-m suit various safety assessments. However, the study reveals that parameter estimates vary significantly with both segment length and sample size. This highlights the sensitivity of parameters to data aggregation and sample size across different segment lengths, making it difficult to identify a single optimal length. Therefore, we propose selecting the segment length and segmentation approach based on specific local conditions, highway context, data availability and quality. The methodology presented here can guide policymakers in LMICs to make informed choices regarding segment length for safety evaluations, including blackspot identification and treatment on their highways.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IATSS Research
IATSS Research TRANSPORTATION-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
44
审稿时长
42 weeks
期刊介绍: First published in 1977 as an international journal sponsored by the International Association of Traffic and Safety Sciences, IATSS Research has contributed to the dissemination of interdisciplinary wisdom on ideal mobility, particularly in Asia. IATSS Research is an international refereed journal providing a platform for the exchange of scientific findings on transportation and safety across a wide range of academic fields, with particular emphasis on the links between scientific findings and practice in society and cultural contexts. IATSS Research welcomes submission of original research articles and reviews that satisfy the following conditions: 1.Relevant to transportation and safety, and the multiple impacts of transportation systems on security, human health, and the environment. 2.Contains important policy and practical implications based on scientific evidence in the applicable academic field. In addition to welcoming general submissions, IATSS Research occasionally plans and publishes special feature sections and special issues composed of invited articles addressing specific topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信